Ryzen 2 - March 2018

Ryzen 2 - March 2018
Higher core and memory clocks.

wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-2-set-march-2018-launch-12nm-support-higher-core-memory-clock-speeds/

THANK YOU BASED AMD

MOMMY IS MAKING INTEL SWEAT

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOo

But threadripper 2 when?

>Ryzen 7 Gaming under Premium mobile

higher ALU part with HBM!?
It's obviously different from the current Ryzen mobile

...

bryan on suicide watch

sweet. Gonna upgrade muh shit.

raven ridge thinkpads when?

That implies another die, which I doubt.
It's either an "H" SKU or KBL-G like package with Vega11/12 dGPU.
Soon™, maybe even at CES.
A485? Maybe.

That's probably BK's face in two quarters.

I can only hope Threadripper is getting a refresh too, I want muh PCIe lanes.

It probably will, but later than the mainstream lineup.
Probably in August.
1 year to EOL should be fine.

>Threadripper 2 (Zen2)
>2019
DROPPED!

Probably fall of next year.

I've seen this image and it looks to be official but I just realized something about Zen 2.
What is that Ryzen 7 Gaming 5? An APU?
If not, Intel is in trouble with AMD's 12nm or 7nm (?)

inb4 polack tripfaggot shill posts itt

...

TR is just neutered Epyc, so it mostly depends on whether Pinnacle Ridge respin of Zeppelin makes it to enterprise or not.

If it's really just a "12" nm port for higher clocks, that becomes less likely, since many-core server parts are about lowest possible power while maintaining moderate clocks.

OTOH, we still haven't seen actual enterprise parts using their on-die 10 GbE controllers etc., so new steppings may be needed just to get the server parts fully functional too.

I want 10% more giggle hurts on all core. And 10% better IPC.

EPYC is not getting a refresh, it (among with Snowy Owl) stays on ZP-B2.
TR might probably get a refresh assuming they don't remove GMI from PR.
Gotta shit on Cascade Lake X parade.
>I want 10% more giggle hurts on all core.
Yes, probably more.
>And 10% better IPC.
No.

>neutered
but it's HIGHERCLOCKSPEED
>the rest of the post
in english, doc? TR2 when?

I fully expect it to be later of course, if at all. If we had an official announcement I would probably buy TR now to sell later and upgrade, but as it stands I'm going to wait and sit on my money. I'd be happy with some X470 mobo with a PCIe switch and a new 8C R7 too, if something like that were to come out. Probably won't happen though.

NO

I thought of this image the moment I saw the news headline
top fucking kek this is the greatest thing to ever happen to Sup Forums shitposting

But will it still be AM4?

Did you read the article?

I wonder what the top number of CUs they can have on an APU until memory bandwidth is no longer sufficient. techreport did notice that in cpu demanding scenarios, the gpu can lose fps from sharing memory with the cpu. HBM should be the way forward for any APU with more than 12 CUs.

I suppose Ryzen is the best CPU around now? I never thought I'd ever see AMD beat Intel.

Yes dumbass. It was in the article.

AMD has committed to AM4 until at least 2020.

Kinda depends on the workload. If you need highest possible single core, Intel is your go to. If you want lots of threads and more bang for your buck, I'd recommend AMD. I've got a 6700k and a 1700. They're both really good cpus, but I feel like the 1700 is more stable.

If you hate stuttering, then yes.

until there is a need to switch from DDR4 to something else

amd is already ahead ipc wise clock to clock
its just that ryzen being on a LP node cant clock high enough and after 4.2ghz it gets fucked up by intel

>now
Not now, but rather POSSIBLY in the future.

should i wait for r+, wait for r+ and buy discounted ryzen or buy now?

It isn't
Test 8700k vs 1600x at 3.8ghz and same memory and see amd lose by 5-10%
>hurrdurr shill
>price difference
>hurrdurr intelbot

>If you want to test ipc improvements
Both cpus are 6c 12t
Both cpus are clocked the same
Same memory

It falls behind

>
>It isn't
>Test 8700k vs 1600x at 3.8ghz and same memory and see amd lose by 5-10%
In gaymes only. BTW Ryzen needs faster RAM to operate at it's fullest compared to Intel.

>higher clock
>and better overclockability
the time has cum and so have I

>Pay twice as much for less than 10% better performance