This triggers the redditor

this triggers the redditor

Other urls found in this thread:

whatisnetneutrality.org/timeline
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

A street shitter drinking out of a trashcan?

librul no like him, so I like him. heh :)
guverment regulations is bad. go back to rabbit, you stupid cuckboyz

Why should I care about this faggot? Hes just one guy probably has 20 people telling him what to do.

Obyungo crated net nutrali. Basud pajeet destroi it. Me lieks basid pajeet. fuc obyong.

Dae le commies? xDDD Fuck off libruls xDDD

I'm not even american and I want to pull all his teeth out.

While you were streaming Netflix, I pirated the shows.

While you were buying thousands of Steam games, I bought the retro games.

While you were streaming HD porn in pursuit of a single orgasm, I downloaded SD porn en masse.

And now the U.S. is on fire and the end of Net Neutrality is at our gates, you have the audacity to come to me for help?

But obermer gib pajeet job. So no lieks pajeet to?

...

FUCK TRUMP

AND FUCK WHITE PEOPLE :DDDDD

>drinks your REES

Kek I can taste your salt libby

No but seriously, why ban terms like evidence based and science based? This is suppression of science. It's a goddamn affront to anyone who values the truth.

ISPS DINDU NUFFIN
THEY WUZ GUD BOYS
NEED MO MONEY FO DEM PROGRAMS

>forbidding words like "diversity" and other sjw buzzwords
>bad

How can any president ban the use of words in an agency's budget presentation?

Liberals are so destroyed they are speaking in baby talk. Nice.

False flag.

Could someone explain to me why this Poo the vindaloo in da loo is drinking out of a reese's branded mug?

What's this a reference to? Is it a Colbert thing?

Absolutely based.

fpbp.

>Literally no advantages for consumers
>Sup Forums supports it just to be contrarian
Is there anything dumber than an anti NN fag?

What's happened here is precisely why it is an issue. Consider that it only took 5 people to topple this shit. It didn't take Congress, the Senate, it didn't take el Presidente, and it didn't take the supreme court. It didn't even take elected individuals to enact the destruction of NN. Just 3 really incompetent people. When we're talking about something as substantial as internet freedom, the rules dictating it should be just as enshrined and unalterable as the US constitution. It's future shouldn't be dictated by lobbyists, ISPs, or a small group (3) unelected officials.

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
HE TOOKED OUR INTERNETS FREEDUMBS
(REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEES LOUDER)

>the violent fantasies of effeminate leftist men
pottery

I heard net neutrality only came into being in 2015 and if before that nothing changed, there won't be anything changing from now on too. correct me If I am wrong

Moreover it's actually not an issue exclusive to the US; people at large need to come together on an international scale and have a forum to discuss a bill of rights for the internet. Every (first world) nation with access needs to consider the international ramifications that policies like this can and likely will have.

And don't forget commerce, international trade is heavily influenced by free access to the internet. Not just freightliners but individuals buying import goods from China, Taiwan, or Russia. It's easy to connect dots that might hem up any number of interests in the seams of unregulated providers.

>i'm mad this unelected bureaucracy didn't agree to give itself sweeping new power
>dude it's so crazy unelected officials, like where's congress n shit
How many levels of irony are you on bruh?

whatisnetneutrality.org/timeline

>people at large need to come together on an international scale and have a forum to discuss a bill of rights for the internet

Good argument, faggot. Your shitpost really has me sweating it.

You're talking about universal free speech for the entire world, which will never happen ever.

...

pwnt?

Go back to your containment board

I am not american anyway I was just curious because one american friend told me that all this nn stuff are memes nothing will change that much

I want to start a protest on the NYC street for 60 days and nights straight without eating or drinking for Ajit Pai to be burned at the stake, brought back to life again, drowned by having his feet cemented into bricks so he cannot swim, brought back to life again, have his intestines tied to a stake and then get chased by lions so when the lions chase him his intestines get pulled out, brought back to life again, sawed in half from his groin down to his head, stitched back together and brought back to life AGAIN, get buried alive until he suffocates, then brought back to life AGAIN, and then finally get impaled by Obama’s MASSIVE, GINORMOUS, PARSEC LONG BIG. BLACK. COCK.

But you know what would really make death terrible for our favorite little shit pile?

Reinstating net neutrality in his dying moments.

Join me, worthy citizens of this great nation, on the streets of New York City on 12/17/17 to protest for the most noble cause ever known to man.

FUCK. AJIT. PAI.

>rent-a-lefty shill

It pains me so fucking much to see Sup Forums plagued with reddit normies and queer tumblr autists. Get better soon, Sup Forumsays.

>blatant imgur filename

so now that net neutrality is gone, when does all the shit everybody said would happen, happen?
I already had data caps under net neutrality, i mean the other shit.

this is a legit question, but fwiw after i did my own research because i dont trust people's autistic screeching (see all republicans are racist), and while i agree with the principle of NN, i dont think this is that big of a deal/why does the government need to control more shit/the US handing over control of IP addresses to an NGO a few years ago seems like a bigger deal than NN.

That's wrong. I'm talking about free interchange of information between one point to the next indiscriminately. From one service provider through another to another. If people are looking at CP or promoting "terrorism" then the nation they are doing so in has every right to investigate and pursue them, and the website. but to hand anyone the tools to censor the internet without vast oversight at every level is an act with seriously destructive potential. To offer companies the capacity to offer limitless package deals or otherwise restrict transmissions on any basis other than network saturation without legal oversight or regulations ensuring they behave is absurd.

>CDC can't spam virtue signalling documents all day
awesome

It won't change anything for non-Americans, but giving more power to regional monopolies does nothing for the 56%.

>to hand anyone the tools to censor the internet without vast oversight at every level is an act with seriously destructive potential
>wants to hand exactly this over to the UN

The US has set precedents for virtually every nation in the world in one way or another. Hold no illusion that this has a great potential to reach overseas.

>UN
Where do I state that in any of my posts?

yeah I read nn didn't existed in old times but it was in implication in de facto way, everyone agreed to it without any written form but still than companies like comcast did all stuff like blocking netflix, restricted users from using wifi as their own network and stuff like that, can't say anything about proof of all that stuff, I just hope this place doesn't become all weird because americans still are in majority here, it will be sad to see this place die doesn't matter how worse Sup Forums have become

>come together on an international scale and have a forum to discuss a bill of rights for the internet
>totally not the UN bro
To be fair, your idea would be shit no matter what the international body was. The way around censorship is decentralization, you're advocating the opposite.

So we should take the trunk by force and distribute it equally among the people? Good luck flying that one, homie.

I would laugh my ass off if cable companies start throttling connections to Sup Forums again like Verizon did years ago. Nothing would cause more schadenfreude than 14 year olds crying because they can't circlejerk with other teenage white supremacist betamales.

This is pretty much all the anti-NN crowd brings to the table.

Doubt they'll throttle Sup Forums, it's too easy to persuade idiots using anonymity, wearing a facade of authority while wholly lacking any knowledge in the matters at hand, and doing so successfully. It's a great outlet for it as a matter of fact.

>It didn't take Congress
It still has to go through the congress. It's all paid for already, though.

>le lefty shill
>muh shadilay
Sort yourself out, you can't communicate in memester retard for the rest of your life.

>It pains me so fucking much to see Sup Forums plagued with reddit normies and queer tumblr autists.
It should pain you to see net neutrality destroyed and the board filled with reaction pics and nonsense instead of actual discussion. Re-assess your life

>distributed networks are somehow more implausible than a benevolent international court of online rights

>totally not a paid shill guys, just here talking about NN like I have been for the last six weeks
>anyone who disagrees with me will get 9gag level insults hurled at them

Maybe we should just agree that everyone is paid to be on Sup Forums?

I wish we could go back to pre-GG Sup Forums before everyone turned retarded

They really are considering the huge costs of running even a miles length of fiber. Even if it was decentralized you'd need major interconnects which means there would still be entities controlling the flow of traffic by leveraging their physical infrastructure. Or are you just going to float 25,000 wimax modules across the ocean so you can get 56k speeds communicating with your boy on the Keys? Local intranets wouldn't be worth a shit and again someone would be leveraging their hardware.

But do, please show me some examples of a functional distributed internet free of the political bottlenecks that the physical infrastructure inherently occurs, I am actually inclined to agree with you, but it's unrealistic.

>when you realize you don't shit on NNtards because you dislike NN but because 90% of them are just a bunch of hypocritical degenerates trying to spin their hysterical bid to defend their endless streams of porn and pirated media content from a perceived threat as a moral, virtuous concern to maintain "freedom and openness" on the internet and you just want them to shut the fuck up and let you weigh the issue on your own without their constant primal screeching

Why does your dick have ears and eyes? You should really get that checked out.

>not streaming porn and pirating music
lmao what a fag

Yeah, you know now that you mention it, pol wasn't half as bad before GG. Those SJW faggots screeching that Sup Forums was fucking with them really drove every asshole on the internet to pol.

So you're just projecting and being an asshole?

Christ, why are indians so fucking ugly

it's very sad lately
did I hit a nerve?
shut the fuck up already

>write long winded single sentence
>go full edgelord
>get called on it
>'ur fucken mad u fag'

Please spare everyone the superiority act. You're going to look back on this when you grow up to be a real person and wonder how it was anyone tolerated your fsggotry.

It's not like meshnets aren't a thing. Main obstacle, iirc, is encryption is illegal on HAM.

All digital transmissions are illegal on ham.

Basically, yeah. Both sides turned into an identity politics shitflinging match and drove a bunch of normalfags into their respective camps. All of the liberal identity politics turned into the holier-than-thou- Hillaryfags and the conservative identity politics turned into the neo-reactionary Trumpfags. I miss the days when you could make jokes about supporting Stalin/Hitler and everyone would just assume you were being retarded.

please focus your attention to the words circled by red, moron

>read a "long-winded" sentence you don't like
>cry about "projection" and how some anonymous retard on the internet that said something he didn't like is an "asshole"
>get called on it
>I-I'm not mad I just called you out! stop acting so superior to me you're such a huge faggot that needs to grow up!
you sure showed me that NN faggots aren't whiny and hysterical and I'm just "projecting"
fuck off to reddit already or at least stay in one or two threads

Aw, a newfag is telling me to go to reddit. How cute. This is the only thread I'm posting in right now, fag, so if you're getting the same treatment somewhere else, it's probably because you're an idiot and not because anyone thinks you're interesting enough to stalk.

that's an awfully long-winded sentence my dude, want to talk about it?

Without calling anyone a shill, i would like a legitimate argument for the repeal of net neutrality and how it benefits anyone other than ISPs (this includes underground websites, small businesses, and regular consumers), and be sure to provide examples.

'fraid not, brainlet, I'm going to sleep now.

Show me on the doll where he touched you

me too
don't forget your bedtime noose

lol whatif congress keeps the money and tells them to fuckoff?

It highlights the vulnerability of the agency responsible for upholding it. See: It's pretty sad that a policy affecting 320m+ people can be deflected at the whim of three people. said it has to go through congress, but also that it's been paid for. Which is likely true given the heaving clout these companies have borne for the last couple decades as the internet has become exponentially proliferated.

This shit should be like the constitution, unalterable without extreme exceptions. It should also be written by the people and for the people, strict and concise wording relegating ISPs to provider-only roles in the industry.

so they have to explain things now or what

>tfw the "nazis" now glorify a fucking streetshitter pajeet because pooinloo made people mad

NN gets changed and fags love it even though their the ones who are getting the rimming.
Honestly Sup Forums. it's kind of endearing that you have the survival instinct of a dodo.

Why did you quote my post?

>literally drinking liberal tears from a giant mug labeled "reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee-se's"

/ourpoo/

Tf you talkin aboot

You quoted my post and didn't leave any reply.

>literally
Now user, you got to be shitting me.

>Trash man drinking from a trash cup

Jesus christ at least you made the whole post into a green just to tell anons out there that whatever you type in there is complete crap.

Look, I know it's unsanitary, but he's already a Pajeet. What's the worse that could happen?

Not really, in a way they were way more contained than they once were and actually used arguments back then instead of buzzwords but they were still a bunch of fags.
Fags enough to get their board deleted thrice.

literally means virtually now.

>when you realize that anti-NN anons are just contrarian edgelords who are incapable of assessing policy on its own merits and can only form reactionary positions based on who they perceive to be making an argument yet they think they’re entitled to have everyone else shut up and never criticize their paper thin ad hominem arguments

>not being comfy with your fellow soyboys

lmao @ the salty redditors