What went right?

what went right?

>apple
Nothing save for music production.

that looks pretty slick actually
just watch out for apple pushing a trademark lawsuit

As long as OP doesn't advertise it for sale he won't hear from Apple.
Apple nailed Psystar because they were selling an unlicensed Mac clone. They were also representing some Open Source code as their own and charging for it.
They don't hassle dudes making FrankenMacs or Hackintoshes for their own use.
I've sometimes seen Hackintoshes offered on eBay. Looks like it's Ok if you're just selling your machine, not trading.

>apple
>good for music production
where am i

Nothing.

apple products are unironically better for creative stuff, mainly because even tho 99% of creative software is available for both macOS and Windows, the macOS versions don't require a brain to install and maintain and artists usually lose their shit when dealing with "computer stuff"

source: I've been fixing personal computers for a decade

DPC latency

weird
figured hackintoshes would be a violation of copyright and dmca

where can I get this?

>unironically better for creative stuff

Do Macs even support CUDA?

>low audio latency
>small diversity in hardware means software is more optimised
>dpi scaling the best around
>standard in music studios around the world

What exactly is it? A Mac Mini?

I think it's perfectly fine in the ToS as long as you buy OSX

>low audio latency
Not unique to imacs
>small diversity in hardware means software is more optimised
Irrelevant since their hardware is massively underpowered
>dpi scaling the best around
Irrelevant in...pretty much every fucking way. Anybody doing visually important "creative work" is going to have a high quality monitor no matter what.
>standard in music studios around the world
Literally false

i think it's a custom case made to liek 1:2 scale or something

>source: my arse
The Chilean GEMA uses Macs for almost anything. Old and new. Only a handful pair of computers are Windows based ones. A teacher has a Ubuntu Studio HP laptop, but almost isnt used.
Great. I proved you wrong.

Yes.

>not unique to imacs
Yeah, you can use an interface on Windows, thus bringing up the price, or use ASIO4All, thus bringing your system unstable, or use Windows 10, thus dealing with a half baked OS with botnet everywhere.

>No u!
If my source in my ass so is yours.
>Some shithole department in Chile uses iMacs because they're retarded
So does my math department, does that means iMacs are magically better for heavy computation?

>thus bringing up the price
Oh no, my equivalent dell box is gunna have an extra $50 tacked on, bringing my savings down to only $2350!

>nobody uses this
>here's some people that use it
>that's wrong!!!! I would have to admit there are holes in my overly generalized narrative!
wintards are the eternal cancer killing Sup Forums

>heavy computation
>audio
Okey, Pajeet. Go to shill dell somewhere else.
Musicians likes macs. Accept that and move on.

People using it != Industry standard
You're a moron

You're also a moron.
Do you seriously have such poor cognitive abilities to know what analogous comparisons are?

>Macfags are dumb for expend money
>but wintards not

>analogous computation
Yeah, keep moving the goalposts, retard.
Cant you just accept that some professions like to use Macs?

Nah, the MacOS license is granted for use on official Apple hardware only. But anons are right in that Apple aren't that bothered by hackintoshes in reality.