Users are more impressed by UI changed than bugfixes

Users are more impressed by UI changed than bugfixes

FACT

If your programs has noticable bugs they are likely to replace your program

design sells stuff (cars, phones, computers.. and software too)

if linux looked better, it would be more popular

KDE and Gnome bother look fine by default. The other DE aren't designed for the average user.
If Linux had more support it would be used. The only argument my friends have is "hurr muh programs".

yeah the problem with Linux is that it doesn't look good. Not that it has no software or drivers, requires dropping down to shell to do basic things, and could completely break on you just from updating a package

Linux is a kernel. It doesn't look like anything.

woah u smart man!!!

>if linux looked better, it would be more popular
As noted by Android post 3.0. Too bad most people working on linux on the desktop are complete spergs who hate anything design-related and would rather just attempt to copy others.

Linux looks better than Windows tho. I'd install gnome or deepin or budgie in Windows 8 if I could.

Users are impressed with things that they can actually notice.

you are mom is a kernel yet she looks like a whore, explain??

>Linux looks better than Windows tho.
sure if you live in 2004

Firefox UI is gay as fuck. Chrome is unironically the best looking browser.

>Firefox UI is gay as fuck
yeah, but you can style it yourself.

Honestly, thats the only reason I'm using Sorrosfox. If chrome supported userstyles, I would use chrome instead...

> style it yourself
> used someone else's CSS

Linux users are what prevent Linux from looking good. Have you seen those eye-popping green'n'black tiling+terminal desktops? Literally every time!

Yes, because when you fix a bug you're making it how it should be from the start. With interface makeover you introduce something new.

Linux users are what prevent Linux from looking good. Have you seen those eye-popping green'n'black tiling+terminal desktops? Literally every one of them!

Well of course I wouldn't use a gay-ass looking interface (pre flat-design interfaces and disproportionally designed flat interfaces) I'm constantly looking at the entire time I'm spending on the program but that doesn't imply I'm exclusively choosing the best looking program while disregarding how functional it is.

>used someone else's CSS
nope, did it myself lol.. just removed some padding, the border and used vibrant-dark style for background

You call that good-looking CSS? Get with the times grandpa, this is the age of minimalistic, non-euclidean geometry-based browsers... like Chrome

if chrome style is so good, why the fuck did they put this vertical space above tabs??

also, I like vertical lines more than diagonals. And of course, you only have dark mode in incognito in chrome (the themes in their gallery all look like pure shit, not worth downloading)

Bae I am here to tell you to kill yourself, do it please.

I hate that new, quirky nu-male newtab page. As if ad tiles weren't enough. Remember to disable activity-stream in about:config and also set `browser.newtabpage.directory.source` to `data:text/plain,` or `127.0.0.1`
Here's my small userContent.css fixes for the newtab page
@-moz-document url(about:newtab) {
#newtab-search-container { display:none !important; }
h1#topsites-heading { display:none !important; }
.newtab-title::before { display:none !important; }
}
If you want to keep the search bar, remove/comment out the 2nd line