4:3 master-

race
4:3 -
masterrace-
death to-
widescreen fags

Because why see more when you can see less

Too bad you can’t get it at an acceptable resolution and LCD.
I’d totally try it, but i’m not using some shitty low res thing or an ancient CRT

???

wow

...

what is this jew magic

...

This is what every black person's cutting edge television looks like. Usually resting against the wall in a room with no furniture.

>16:12 isnt better than 16:10 or 16:9

>21:9 cuwwwwwe ultrawi masturrrraccc

5:4 lol

3:2 is the true master race

kek

>4:3
>not 1:1

pleb

Anyone? Is there any way to get an acceptable 4:3 monitor?

if you make the vertical or horizontal sizes equal for any ratio, you can make one look better than the other. a 16:9 looks like you see more if you scale it against 4:3 where the heights are equal. 9/3 is 3, so 4x3=12, 3x3= 9 and a 16:9 would be up against a 12x9 and look better.

Take the width as the comparative factor 16x9 vs. 4:3, gotta make them the same size. 16/4=4, so 4x4 is 16 and 3x4 is 12 so its 16x9 vs 16x12 and the 4:3 looks better

...

i know this is a meme thread but

>largest 4:3 resolution monitor available: 2048 x 1536
>largest 16:9 resolution monitor available: 7680 x 4320
>4:3 pixels: 3,145,728
>16:9 pixels: 33,177,600

really makes you think

The future is penis, OP.

4:3 fag here, this is pretty neato.

2048x1536 is pretty nice, but sadly it is too tiny on my 18" Syncmaster 997DF.

3:2 is better
my Huawei Matebook X has the same vertical screen space as a 15" laptop but is smaller than a sheet of paper

>plebs don't know about the golden ratio
The closest, commonly available aspect ratio is 16:10, therefore 16:10 monitors are the best.

is it true ultrawides are just made from defective 16:9 panels that had to have the top/bottom cut off?

i agree

Kekerino

>3dpd
both are shit

I wish IMAX became a standard and TVs were made to display it.

how did you get your wangblows to get them aesthetics

What do you want to know about exactly? I can't sleep so I will tell you whatever you want to know, if I am able.

the time is 1:23:45 and I am going to bed
go to rbt and search for poop.webm , poop.png and such to find an image or two explaining some of the actions I took to make it look certain ways.

um the windows theme/taskbar, browser and how you get windows to use less resources.

>1024x768 is better than 1366x768

>He's not an Apache helicopter pilot

Sucks for you, eyelet.

but it is

4:3 is for programming and reading. 16:9 are for blind consumers sucking pedowood cock.

16:10

>his eyes are broken

Superior

CRT masterrace

>21:9 + 16:10

Might ask here, what's the general opinion on 18:9 aka 2:1 aspect ratio on phones?

Eat shit, Sup Forums
5:4 is the true way of the Lord

>21:9
pleb.
32:9 master race

afaik the blu ray will show 1.77:1 in full frame for the entire length

Holy fuck, I hate this retarded ultrawide trend so much, 16:9 is disgusting and looks like a stupid horizontal bar, anything wider than it is pure cancer.
As a 16:10 (the true patrician choice, btw) fan this pisses me the fuck off because the prices for it are completely retarded, all the good offers are in 16: fucking 9

I bought a Dell 2007FPB the other day, it's a nice, cheapy monitor. Older anime looks great on it.

5:4

What if you have five monitors, one of which is 4:3, the others are 16:9, one of those is vertical?

>implying they're not the same
4x4=16
3x3=9

comfort

16/4=4
9/3=3
Mindblown

using a 16:10 monitor and a 4:3 as second monitor

Post wally

...