Touch screen > nipple

Touch screen > nipple

...

Nah m8

< mouse

> < Trackball

say the cursor is in the middle of the screen and you need to close a window, (and assuming keyboard shortcuts don't work for that program) you can close that window faster with a touch screen than the nipple. fact

bonus: it gives your fat greasy arms so exercise too

why not both? my laptop has a pressure sensitive touch display that also works with a fine point hard stylus, and it has a track point. Add in a USB mouse just for fun sometimes, and you have the holy trinity. Plus the screen rotates 180 degrees and folds over so it covers the keyboard (preventing accidental key storkes in tablet mode) and becomes a tablet. Cant beat that. Only problem is that the fucker is 10 years old.

say your hands are in the middle of the keyboard and you need to do something
you can reach the clitmouse faster than you can reach the touchscreen

>touchscreen
>on a laptop

Since when did Sup Forums get THIS casual? Why is it that Apple are the only manufacturer that haven't put a touchscreen on their laptops? Why is it they're the only ones vehemently against it and say they'll never do it because its simply unergonomic and retarded?

movement of the cursor is too slow, is what I'm saying

>can't tell nipple from clitoris
>opinion discarded

>you need to close a window
Yeah, it's better not to use a pointing device to perform one well-defined and common function. Just do Alt-F4/Super+Shift+Q/Mod+Q/Ctrl+W/whatever your system is using.

It's not our problem if you're too retarded to set the pointer speed.

Fastest speed setting on cursor < touchscreen

No it isn't.

You mean Mod+Shift+q

He meant Alt+F4, fuckign macfag

>Mod+Q
MacFags call it Cmd dumby
>pic relate

I actually meant "whatever your system is using". You're free to call it whatever you want, it's not set in stone.

mouse clit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>believing anything apple says

They don't put touchscreen on MacOS because it is not optimised for touch, W10 is

>nipple
it's a clit you dimwit

>They don't put touchscreen on MacOS because it is not optimised for touch

Yes, that's an intentional decision; not to make their desktop OS touch input usable. They could have years ago but didn't. What is your point?

because you asked the question
point is it is perfectly normal to have touch on a laptop if it is optimised for it.

Because putting my hand up to the screen from the keyboard obviously doesn't take as much time as fiddling for .2 seconds with the clit.