>>64247047

I fear this'll be more similar to the previous shitty m.2 accelerators than the 900p, so may as well get the latter instead... assuming you're on an AMD platform to avoid having your iops slashed in half.

>these capacities
Why.
No, this one is more like the real deal.

>meltdown ssd
no thank you

Crosspoint is unrelated to Meltdown.

2 intelbux have been deposited to your goyim account

5 rupees have been deposited in your designated account

Intel

Cannot into Intel CPU to use crosspoint storage
Cannot into Intel igp to do gfx haz to batphone amd Vega

Hmmmm. At least we has pretty blue logo guys. Guise?

>This PCIe 3.0 x2 drive will come in two capacities—58 GB and 118 GB
nobody needs that shit.

>intel products have their IO reduced by 30%
>here goy new and faster broducts ;DDDDddd
Can't make this shit up

Just in time to counteract the loss of performance for Intlel faggots

>purely coincidence goy

>3d xpoint
>58 GB
Reminder, 64 GB SSD were being sold nearly 10 years ago. We're still stuck on

I think they're targeting the people who were using SSD as cheap RAM "pagefile"

Really Intel jewing the fuck out of their products. They could've released >1TB versions, but they will hold it off for as long as possible and reap the profits from the barely faster than SSD 58 GB drives

Crosspoint has shitty density.
1TB models are currently missing for a reason.

>This PCIe 3.0 x2 drive will come in two capacities—58 GB and 118 GB

sweet I'll call 2010 to let them know the exciting news

Does this piece of shit also suffer from the meltdown thing?

When is AMD gonna release something similar for a lower price?

Wouldn't it be cheaper to just raid some nvme or m2 SSDs? You'd at least end up with a decent amount of storage.

It's a fucking memory you dumb retard.
AMD fabs no memory.

>It's a fucking memory you dumb retard.
Which also has a controller intel could have botched

>AMD fabs no memory.
fuck

NAND will never reach the crosspoint 4k QD1 throughput.

Have there been non hybrid, full solid state drive for 1 TB?

>I think they're targeting the people who were using SSD as cheap RAM "pagefile"
but who would buy an overpriced optane for that? you'd probably be better off just buying more RAM to at best not need a page file, or get a much higher capacity 960 pro with probably the same practical performance.

Controllers are not fucking x86.
There's a 4TB 850 EVO, even.

this

If Optane latency and speed is close to ram, the advantage of Optane would be persistency

>the advantage of Optane would be persistency
Like their meltdown bug?

>2018
>buying Intel
>ever
Yeah, naw cunt

How the fuck an exploit in speculative execution is related to fucking memory you dumb phoneposter?

Because most likely this shitty memory has the fucking bug.

How the fuck does the quirk of speculative execution relate to fucking memory, you retarded phoneposter?
Memory is a memory.

It's made by intel you mong. If it doesn't have some variation of meltdown it's sure as hell to have the fucking spectre bug.

What in the ungodly fuck are you talking about you shitsniffing retard

It's a memory.
How can memory have quirks related to speculative execution, you braindead phoneposter?

hi brian

This damage control thread brought to you by: Intel™

>unironically being this fucking retarded
kys yourself to peaces my man

I can't wait when it turns out it does and you get BTFO in multiple threads, brian.

>my HDD is 5GHz
t. amdtard

At least it doesn't have 30% less performance.

>S-see guise? Intel makes other stuff besides shitty processors
Intlels at their finest.

>If Optane latency and speed is close to ram
not close enough to replace DRAM (100x slower if memory serves right), and not dense nor affordable enough to replace NAND. it could have its use as extended, persistent memory, but that would require some clever memory management to utilize. the current offerings really don't have much of a practical use unless you want to overpay for a dedicated page file drive.

For you, brian.

unironically neck yourself