California a couple weeks ago as the result of being sued came out with a study done in 2009 saying that cell-data from cell phones causes a significant increase in brain cancer.
So what? What about wi-fi? Isn't it similar? If so, that would explain why we are seeing all of the progress in brain tumor therapies hitting the block these days. It's like everyday I look at the news I see a new drug for brain cancer.
I believe there's a big cover up going on and the way they are gonna get out of it is by developing a cure for brain cancer. Thoughts?
>It's like everyday I look at the news I see a new drug for brain cancer. It's targeted advertising for brain cancer victims.
James Morgan
Now that you mention it, I remember it was kind of a hot topic about ten years ago about cellphones being potentially harmful for our health or not, but I was too young at that time to think about it, so I don’t remember it precisely.
Jackson Peterson
Cellphone radiation is non-ionizing so it cannot cause cancer. In fact the only damage it can do is burn you but that requires hundreds of concentrated watts to do. Phones send and receive things in the hundreds of milliwatt range (1000 milliwatt = 1 watt).
What you should be worried about is exposure to ionizing radiation, too much time at the beach without sunscreen or too many x-rays can lead to cancer due to dna being damaged.
Chase Myers
the california study proves it...whats not mentioned is wi-fi...im inclined to think that wi-fi is probably just as bad maybe even worse than cell-data...
Brayden Smith
(You) (OP) california warned all residents that cell data leads to an increase in brain cancer ..ill link it or google it
>wifi is just as bad as cellphones >cellphone radiation is harmless Well its not wrong.
Luis Evans
it's 100% BS, just click bait mang
>"Exposure to ionizing radiation, such as from x-rays, is known to increase the risk of cancer. However, although many studies have examined the potential health effects of non-ionizing radiation from radar, microwave ovens,cell phones, and other sources, there is currently no consistent evidence that non-ionizing radiation increases cancer risk (1).
>"The only consistently recognized biological effect of radiofrequency energy is heating. The ability of microwave ovens to heat food is one example of this effect of radiofrequency energy. Radiofrequency exposure fromcell phone use does cause heating to the area of the body where acell phone or other device is held (ear, head, etc.). However, it is not sufficient to measurably increase body temperature, and there are no other clearly established effects on the body from radiofrequency energy."
That is literally how science works. People release new studies, people release counter studies that disprove old ones, and so on until we uncover the truth together. One shitty study does not prove anything.
Brody Williams
fpbp
Owen Richardson
that's why they are curing brain cancer so that when the shit hits the fan and the world finds out, no one will care :D
Carter Sanders
Pretty much, studies after studies have found no link between cancer and non-ionizing radiation in the hundreds of milliwatts range.
Billions would be dead by now if this were true yet here we all are, still being alive and stuff.
Bentley Gonzalez
don't say i didn't tell you so! im not here to prove anything. go ahead, sleep on your cell phone everynight ;)
Evan Mitchell
That's exactly what I did during middle/highschool. I'd fall asleep browsing chinese cartoons and looking at pictures of my hot cousins every night. Yet I'm still here.
Ryder Johnson
>Sleep on cellphone tfw literally do this sometimes if I fall asleep listening to music. Surprised I haven't strangled myself with the headphone wire yet..
Josiah Roberts
What is the issue with being close to the antennas? I know there are pretty strict guidelines to how close you can be when they're on.
Carter Bell
i know 6 people between 25-30 who all have stage 4 brain cancer. crazy eh?
Sebastian Nguyen
especially when only 17,000 people per year are diagnosed with this...uptick? duh.
Luis Morales
>What is the issue with being close to the antennas? I know there are pretty strict guidelines to how close you can be when they're on. Antenna for what?
Ian Thompson
Mostly they just don't want people fucking with them so most go away when they see "radiation" in the signs.
John Richardson
This was workplace safety stuff though. I don't remember the exact safety distances, but say like 10m on axis and a couple of meters if directly below..
