Americans have to hand write a letter begging for pornography and send $20 to be able to look at boobs on the internet

>Americans have to hand write a letter begging for pornography and send $20 to be able to look at boobs on the internet

Defend this. Why do you let politicians have this much control over your internet?

Other urls found in this thread:

humantraffickingpreventionact.com/
cato.org/survey-reports/state-free-speech-tolerance-america
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Obsessed.

There bills are introduced by retards all the time. They never pass

>patently offensive material
political opinions that are different from mine are patently offensive
but on a more serious note how are they expecting to do that? neither white nor blacklists are feasable i mean if they block youporn then you can go to some other page

It hasn't been passed, can't be enforced, and would likely be struck down by the courts.

they could block porn using some sort of algorithm. however all of that can be bypassed with the use of VPN so why bother?

Sounds like someone's mad about living in a Muslim country that will require your to enter your credit card information on every porn site in order to gain access

b-but CNN told me that the republicans are the ones that want to censor the internet!

It'll never get out of committee. It's a direct violation of free speech

>they could block porn using some sort of algorithm
i can not imagine that to be technologically and monetarily feasible
>so why bother?
because government and shit and protects the childrens from the evil evil porn

Do you really think democrats care about internet porn? The sole intent of a bill like that is political censorship, otherwise the wording wouldn't be so intentionally vague.

>blocking content on the internet
lol

>Do you really think
no i don*t and i think it's quite obvious out of the way i wrote it
>The sole intent of a bill like that is political censorship
this is literally my first statment

>can't imagine that to be technologically feasible
i will assume you're not baiting. I used to live in Saudi Arabia and porn was blocked, except for ultra obscure websites where they named their porn in numbers.

>because governments and shit protects from porn
i am against porn in general since it is degeneracy, but it is the job of parents to raise their children and there is great amount of porn blocking programs out there.

its about the money, shilled by ips

humantraffickingpreventionact.com/
I don't really feel like checking, but I'm pretty sure the republicans outnumber the democrats here.

Typical. Democrats don't respect the first amendment.

I wonder what other stuff they are using it to filibuster against.

Blocking porn is a good idea

>porn should be lega-

>the absolute fucking state of America

A republican woman in Texas tried to ban masturbation a few weeks ago. They all do it.

A liberal supreme court would ban "hate speech" in a second.

what are you on about? this is not a left/right issue. neocons and neolibs are both the same cancer and love the exact same things:
>war
>interventionism
>big corporations
>censorship
>take away your freedom
>jews/ israel
>big banks
>globalism
>fake moralism to take away even more freedom

How the fuck is this relevant to technology whatsoever besides the internet? Fuck off

what is this graph showing exactly? i know that you are in for a good cause but you have to be more precise if you want people to take you seriously.

oy vey goyim, shut up and vote for your favorite party.

>rhode island
of course
only in the worst state

Obesed.

He's clearly a right wing democrat. Only running under the dem name to get elected in rhode island.

...

> except for ultra obscure websites where they named their porn in numbers.
ie it's technologically unfeasible
just because most know pages are unable to be viewed doesn't mean it's a dried up well especially considering that we are talking about the us where the chance of a simple avoidance of these blocking algorithms by the content providers is high
but it is the job of parents
exactly fullstop the government has no right(moral right) to do shit

>can not imagine that to be technologically and monetarily feasible
It absolutely isn't. There are many, many places where one can find porn. It's very easy to spin up simple Wordpress-based sites with videos embedded from one or more of the various CDNs available (e.g. Openload or even Google Drive for fuck's sake). ISPs can't block the the major CDNs just to prevent the streaming of any potential porn that's uploaded there, this would be overkill and unreasonable.
You have to keep in mind the people proposing this kind of ideas are technologically illiterate and haven't the slightest clue how the internet works. All they know is how to login to Facebook and scroll the damn feed.

>You have to keep in mind the people proposing this kind of ideas are technologically illiterate
i doubt that i find it more likely that they use that as an excuse to bring in internet censorship legislation so that they can expand it towards political stuff

People have no idea the great benefits that society has from the fact that there is free porn online available to everyone at anytime. Imagine all those frustration build ups demonstrated through violent crime, and rape.

The same bill exists in basically every other state.

This nigger has a point. Porn is safer than prostitution for all the parties involved.

>here is your brain
>here is your brain while chewing food
durrr

>Rhode Island

This is the same state whose drivers are going 10 under in the hammer lane all the time, fuck them hope it passes

I highly doubt that even if they would it has nothing to do with banning porn or masturbation. Something that's been supported by assholes from both trash parties.

Liberals no longer believe in free speech. Most of them support banning it and would do it if they get in power. Scroll down some on this page.
cato.org/survey-reports/state-free-speech-tolerance-america

Maybe there wouldn't be so many manchildren and are birth rate would reach a stable level. Overall being a net gain from society.

>Cato
into the trash it goes ;^)

>birth rate stable level

no one looks at the world wide birth rate and says "we need to increase that"

It's a survey dummy. 52% of democrats say that the government should prevent hate speech.

between porn and prostitution id prefer most men really use the prostitute, it would achieve even better results of self esteem for the population affected.

I said safer, not necessarily better.

>prostitution is better than porn for self esteem
i have to disagree with this one. i'd rather watch porn than pay some stranger to give me false affection. i mean, i can legit imagine myself having suicidal thoughts after doing it with a prostitute. yes i am a virgin, laugh at me.

>world wide birth rate
Who gives a fuck about this

>le earth does have enough le resources to sustain us
when will this meme die?

hebt mal nen händl

lol where'd you get a pic of me brain. did you take it while i was sleeping?

Rhode Island is smaller than my garage. Who cares?

It's really not that bad. Do you feel bad paying a chef cooking a meal for you? It's the same thing, a service you pay for daily pucci for 40 to 60 minutes. You then move on with your life. Try it amigo. Don't low ball though. You wouldn't buy street food from a rundown taxi stand same rules apply.

Its not a member african, Mexican, indian and chinese uterus's literally can not stop pumping out 17 brown colored monkies at a time. It will be a big issue Eventually.

why would anyone want to defend this?
this is fucking retarded and the fact that Democrats are now doing what Republicans wanted to do 15 years ago is fucking retarded.
>standards of decency.
didn't people like Lenny Bruce and William S Burroughs practically end decency and obscenity laws back in the 60s.
what the fuck is wrong with people?

I like that meme. It justifies genocides, and African population is rising like a bubble.

>false affection
im sorry but... what the fuck is wrong with you man? a prostitute will not offer you false affection. are you calling it false because it is offered in exchange of money? ALL RELATIONSHIPS ARE TRANSACTIONAL MONEY IS JUST THE EASIEST CHEAPEST WAY TO GET THE EXACT SAME RESULT.

Find yourself a hooker, you will feel ten times better to just get it out of your system, sex is nothing special you will see that once you fuck for the first time, it becomes something special when you have a relationship with someone you really care about and they care about you, but always keep in mind even that special relationship is transactional, there is always something you offer to the other person and that person offers something to you. Jacking off will never achieve the same result.

>Check common.wikimedia.org
>There are "humans anus" "sex" "penis" and "Hairy male anus" categories with legit fair use or CC

Rhode island should block wikipedia

finally y'all getting a gf

To be fair, Rhode Island has always been a state full of lunatics. It was literally founded by weirdos nobody else wanted around.

no shit the government is running out of welfare money and it needs billions of dollars to support women on welfare. this is their solution to get men to take care of women and get women out of welfare. they did the same to illegal men and got them to marry women for papers.

>muh african population
AIDS and wars are keeping them in check. we will never run out of resources on earth. there is also the fact that more than half the food is being wasted.

seriously who the fuck talked about limited resources, although they are limited, that is not the fucking point. we dont need more people than we already got.

>seriously who the fuck talked about limited resources
that is what has been pushed by the jewish propaganda for the past few decades or so.

there is just too many god damn people walking around this earth. we dont need higher birth rate than we already got.
and id doubt the jews would want a lower birth rate, social state and other profitable schemes depend on ever growing population increases.

jews want people to be distracted with non-existent problems. and world population is a non-existent problem.