Untitled

>anandtech.com/show/12541/unlimited-5-year-endurance-100-tb-ssd?

>unlimited endurance guaranteed for 5 years
>standard sata SSD read/write speeds of 500MBps

Large cheap SSDs cant get here fast enough

Attached: nimbus_dc_100_678_678x452.png (678x475, 59K)

Other urls found in this thread:

cdw.com/product/Samsung-PM1633a-MZILS15THMLS-solid-state-drive-15.36-TB-SAS-12Gb-s/4586754
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>Entrusting a single drive to hold that much data
Maybe if you're running server farms this would be great, but as an individual I can't imagine a better way to get fucked

You already have a single drive to hold 1 TB of "that much" data.

Shouldn't you split that into multiple 1.44 MB of disklets to be more secure?

Need next gen connection support nvm.

>Samsung we release 100TB by 2020
>nimbus hahahahahaha

>anandtech
>reading poo websites

Sata 3.3 can support ~ 2GB/s.

No need for additional hardware.

No, because your argument is based in black-and-white thought that everything needs to be incredibly small.
1TB of data isn't that much to recover, realistically.
4TB is starting to get to be too much.
100TB for an individual would be absurd to even own, let alone recover.

what the fuck are you even talking about

ever heard of redundancy and back up?

Your initial argument is flawed as it assumes a static/stagnant view of technological progression.

>4 TB ought to be enough for everyone

Its like you don't understand technology.

Are you actually retarded.
>hurr durr no one should keep 512GB of data in one place
>40GB HDDs are much easier to recover!

RAID1/5/6

SSDs do not fail unexpectedly very often to begin with.

they do

most SSDs fail not because they've used up their PEs, but because of errors in the circuit

RAID1 in that case desu

Literally the opposite. If you're running a server farm, you need lots of backups.

If you're running it as a personal drive, you don't need a backup.

>SSDs are still not $100/TB
FUCKING PHONES STOP BUYING NEW PHONES YOU RETARDED NORMIES REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Haven't bought one in a decade.

How much
I don't want to read more "learn more" slides just tell me how much you fucking want

The article states similar cost/TB compared to other enterprise SSD on the market.

>cdw.com/product/Samsung-PM1633a-MZILS15THMLS-solid-state-drive-15.36-TB-SAS-12Gb-s/4586754
There's a 15.36TB for ~$10K on CDW. That leaves ~ $650/TB. So 100 TB is going to cost probably around $65K. But you know, that might be too conservative given the cdw price is a sale price and given that niche premium products usually have large markups. So maybe anywhere between 65K-100K with ballpark around $80K for average estimate?

no one is going to pay $100 for each TB you faggots

$35/TB and we've got a deal, these fucking SSDs don't cost more than $5 to produce

Standard consumer SSD 1 TB drive costs around $300.

That's ~10x what you're asking for. Those sells like hot cakes

If you can afford a 100 TB SSD for personal use, you can afford a second one for backups.

Restoring 100 terabytes at 500 MBps would take 2.3 days, but let's say 4 days in a non-ideal scenario. That's still perfectly reasonable considering restoring data isn't something you do often.
Actually having 100 TB of data isn't that absurd either, that's like 2000 50 GB movies.

>don't need a backup
>ever
Fucking retard.

people already pay ~$350 for those crucial 2TB SSDs.

>The manufacturer does not disclose pricing of the ExaDrive DC50 and DC100 SSDs, but only says it will be competitive.

What kind of ballpark should we be expecting?

$20,000+
Could be way, way more than that actually. Some 30TB drives are priced around there, so this could easily be 2-3x more.

>hoarding anime, porn and movies
what the fuck for

I've had a couple SSDs fail over the years and they did so instantly and unexpectedly. None of them were even remotely close to exhausting P/E cycles by SMART data.

>boot drive is an OCZ Vertex 2 from 2010
uh oh

Attached: 1514928690878.png (540x548, 465K)

>unlimited endurance guaranteed for 5 years
Is this it? Given what and have said, what is the realistic lifetime to expect from SSDs mere mortals can buy?

i just switched from my vertex 3 to an 850 recently and still felt like i was playing with fire near the end. the drive performs fine but i worked in a retail store that sold the 3 for a while and saw quite a few of them fail, instantly and without warning.

so yeah might wanna address that.

You won't be able to kill a SSD with writes, no matter what you do, well, there are some ways to do it, but you'll never do it unless you own a supercomputer.

Unfortunately, SSDs die for entirely different reasons. Electrical errors, short circuits etc.

>Unfortunately, SSDs die for entirely different reasons. Electrical errors, short circuits etc.
I've heard leaving machines without power for a relatively long period of time can drastically shorten the lifetime of SSDs. Are there any tests with those use cases?

no, but the data disappears

you have to regularly access the data on a SSD to make sure it is in the same bit format

>regularly
SLC - 30 days cell charge endurance.
MLC - 60
eMLC - 260 days
TLC - 130 days.
Samsung's 3D NAND - 320 days.
3DXPoint - 1460 days.

that's pretty bad for a 100TB drive
we wait for GenZ

My pc with a kingston ssd sat for 5 months without power or use and it seems fine, anything i should check to be sure?

fsck

>creates strawman to justify your own delusion

>data hoarding
It satisfies the autism

i hoard 3d and 2d porn, music, documents, pictures and that's it

hoarding movies, anime or tv shows is pretty pointless unless you seed it