Be honest: the only reason you don't like this as much as the SMiLE Sessions is
1. You heard The Sessions first.
2. You don't like the hi definition recording of BWP.
Pic related is objectively superior.
Be honest: the only reason you don't like this as much as the SMiLE Sessions is
1. You heard The Sessions first.
2. You don't like the hi definition recording of BWP.
Pic related is objectively superior.
Other urls found in this thread:
No user, medium tier bait I'll give you that but no. A fan of Brian Wilson should hear both but there is no way pic related surpasses his lost masterpiece.
the version of good vibrations on here isn't good
It surpasses The SMiLE Sessions.
>the "hum-de-da" canon addition prior to the return of the chorus is not good
Pleb.
Mark Linnet 1988 shits on every other SMiLE rendition
FACT
His voice turned to shit. That's enough reason to not like it.
>1966 carl's voice is better than 2004 brian's and it's not even close
His voice is fine, you're just idiots.
but carl's is better
Well The Smile Sessions is the closest to Smile we'll ever get and from what I know it's only missing some transitional tracks that would have made the "suite" style last the whole album which would make the track listing make more sense.
>Well The Smile Sessions is the closest to Smile we'll ever get
Bull-fucking-shit, it's blatantly unfinished for more than half of the album while BWP was completed by the original composer.
Yeah I agree with you, 2004 Brian had a great voice.
>no Brian Falls Into a Microphone
>good
OK you have a point there
Yeah but even that version is still missing things that '67 Brian had in mind. Plus the production is completely different and doesn't sound as powerful.
what if smiley smile was actually what brian meant to be smile
it's better than either bwps or smile sessions at least
>even that version is still missing things that '67 Brian had in mind.
It's still a complete vision of the album.
>Plus the production is completely different and doesn't sound as powerful.
See the OP post again.
Just because it's high definition doesn't make it bad, Child is the Father of the Man is one of the most incredible moments in popular music, and you can't even get that on SMiLE Sessions in complete form.
yeah im definitely in the wrong for liking ORIGINAL RECORDINGS from brian's ORIGINAL MINDSET than a rendition 40 years later
you got me OP
the lyrics on this version of good vibrations are a lot worse than mike's lyrics for the song
The unfinished recordings when Brian Wilson was consistently doubting himself and changing shit and had fifty different ideas for forming the album.
>lyrics are music
No they aren't.
it changes up the rhyme scheme and this new/old/whatever one weakens the melody imo
No, it's functionally the same song with a much much much more interesting bridge.
van dyke parks ruined the beach boys they were better on pet sounds when they weren't trying to do the carnivalesque sgt. pepper shtick
>consistently doubting himself
>fifty different versions
If he was at his artistic peak who cares?
is there a version with the original lyrics from 1966? because my main problem is that it doesn't feel right to have someone who isn't carl singing it
closest to 60s smile which is the important thing
>it would have came out before Sgt peppers though.
simply ebinly trolled!!!
I've only heard Smile and never heard The Smile Sessions. Based in Smile, I really hope the Smile Sessions are better, because this is so far inferior to Pet Sounds that it's absurd anyone would call it the greater album. It completely lacks Pet Sounds' immersive vision and power. Sure, they're well-constructed songs, and Good Vibrations is a great song, but for the most part it's just a decent pop rock album.
>decent pop rock album.
youtube.com
listen to this!!!
How is it pop prock?
There's cowboy songs, country, comic songs, doo-wop, barbershop, chanting, noise, cartoons, and field recordings with a unified homage to Americana.
It even contains very unique interpretations of the Great American Songbook.
I don't think many people try to wrap their heads around how bold of an artistic statement SMiLE is today, tomorrow, and especially what it was at the time of its release