Brazil will be part of the Paris Club, whose objective is to help countries in economic crises

Brazil will be part of the Paris Club, whose objective is to help countries in economic crises

The Club brings together only industrialized countries

Announcement was made two hours ago

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=6h8Z1Z-nRWg
politica.estadao.com.br/noticias/eleicoes,petrobras-abriu-mao-de-cobrar-calote-da-venezuela-em-obras-de-refinaria-imp-,1144316
econ.puc-rio.br/uploads/adm/trabalhos/files/td626.pdf
desuarchive.org/int/thread/67922046/#67922046
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>noparistugal

youtube.com/watch?v=6h8Z1Z-nRWg

Brazil will be the retard of the club and be made fun of regularly.

So you'll be the club's token black guy? What's the point of having a non OECD nation that's literally worse off than Mexico on every single economic metric?

The whole point of the Paris club is nations who loan money to the developing world meet to discuss how to finance these countries and handle their debt. Unless you're legit just sitting at the table to be a "voice" for others it basically means you'll be loaning out Brazilian taxpayer's money to countries like Argentina (who will soon be joining the credit market again) with a better HDI and less poverty than you. That's pretty generoud Brazil, especially considering you'll be dismissing any real chance of profit on unavoidable debt re-negotiation schemes for some countries, hell this is something wealthy nations generally do at a loss.

Brazil is a major creditor, investing a lot of money in many institutions.

Brazil joined the group because it invested a huge amount of money in Africa.

Brazil joined the group to be helped and recover economically

I don't see your name on the list, shorty.
Now scram!

That seems nice.

good.

Would you like a head pat? :3

Hello my French brothers.

>no zealand

sheep lovers

monkey lovers

What?

You know... Paris.

So, what else Brazil has to do to be respected as a superpower?

Be imperialistic and kill a few million subhumans, Argentina is a prime target.

Do not intervene in the economy, arrest bandits and encourage entrepreneurship

You loaned money to African countries?

to send more of your tax to the fucked up shitehole countries

Have stable industry, water, and power, and regulate favelas.

I feel sorry for Brazil, they do their best to be recognised as a superpower but nobody takes them seriously as half their population are savages who make Brazil's statistics on HDI, GDP per capita, etc terrible on paper.
If it wasn't for the favela monkeys Brazil would be recognised as a first world great power.

Not just for African countries. We did port in Cuba, hydroelectric in Nicaragua, metro in Venezuela, port in Uruguay, power plants in Bolivia, we built things in Ecuador and Africa

We forgive Venezuela 20 billion

politica.estadao.com.br/noticias/eleicoes,petrobras-abriu-mao-de-cobrar-calote-da-venezuela-em-obras-de-refinaria-imp-,1144316

You will have to intervene at some point.
For entrepreneurship you really need to up education and poverty reduction to make it work as well as some safety nets.

yes so they can be our coloni- cof cof- under our sphere of influence just like Latin America

>only industrialized countries
>russia is in it
kek

Sadly you've done everything to be considered at least a great power, except half your population are favela monkeys that are impossible to civilise, which drastically bring down your average living standards and well being.

Brazil's problem is that it intervenes too much.

So you are saying the only way to become a first world superpower is to genocide niggers like Britain did?

But the intervention here is so much that it needs to be said this way. To give you an idea, private schools need to follow the national curriculum, they do not have the autonomy to teach.

>Cuba
>Nicaragua
>Venezuela
>Ecuador
>Bolivia
>Africa

meh, Uruguay may actually pay, that's 3-5 decades late tho

If it wasn't for government intervention we would probably had gone in 2009 just like everyone else, meanwhile we grew like 8% next year

Did you know that the agenda of the PT was to destroy the Brazilian economy on purpose to implant socialism?

This is part of the socialist tactic. We would be transformed into a Venezuela

no, you just flush their communities with drugs like the americans did then segregate them

So Dilma's impeachment was also part of their masterplan?

Brazil usually tries to join every group that Russia is in, because Brazil wants to surpass the Soviet Union in both influence and military power and nuclear weapons.

well but we got no nigger community, so what should we do?

You are not supposed to tell them that...

Tone done with socialism, as socialism doesn't work when half your country isn't interested in contributing to society.
Adopt a more American model that is a mix of socialism and capitalism.
America manages to be have one of the highest living standards in the world despite only being half white.
Brazil is like USA in how you are both multiracial societies, so what works for USA should theoretically work for Brazil.

>Tone done with socialism, as socialism doesn't work when half your country isn't interested in contributing to society.
which half are you talking about? The poor people or the rich people?
>Adopt a more American model that is a mix of socialism and capitalism.
>Brazil is like USA in how you are both multiracial societies, so what works for USA should theoretically work for Brazil.
But our cultures are completely different m8, shouldn't we mimick Portugal, Spain or Italy?

retards this country has literally no salvation
repent

The power of Brazil is centralized in the capital. In the United States, federal entities can legislate and have much more power

>In the United States, federal entities can legislate and have much more power
Yes the south shall save Brazil!

>whose objective is to help countries in economic crises

Like Brazil?

>Tone done with socialism, as socialism doesn't work when half your country isn't interested in contributing to society.


They do contribute but not enough due to poverty and inefficiencies in the state,federal level and laws.

I for one welcome our new Brazilian overlords

PT's mismanagement robbed us of a whole decade of economic growth, and I'm not even talking about the recession.

>PT's mismanagement robbed us of a whole decade of economic growth, and I'm not even talking about the recession.
Doesn't look like it

>which half are you talking about? The poor people or the rich people?
niggers
>But our cultures are completely different m8, shouldn't we mimick Portugal, Spain or Italy?
You can't mimic Spain, Portugal, and Italy economically as they are monoracial societies while your multiracial. You are culturally like them but that doesn't mean you can economically be like them.
Economically you would be better off adopting American economic system.
So what I'm saying is don't change your culture, you are culturally Mediterranean so keep it that way, what 'm saying is economically change as you are a multiracial society therefore a socialist system like the Mediterranean nations wouldn't work in Brazil.

Read this in its entirety before ever posting here again.
econ.puc-rio.br/uploads/adm/trabalhos/files/td626.pdf

Don't bother responding to him, he's a notorious shitposter with the most nonsensical arguments you will ever see.

>econ.puc-rio.br/uploads/adm/trabalhos/files/td626.pdf
What's a summary of what that's talking about?

>niggers
niggers literally contributed for half of our population and literally gave birth along with whites to brazilian culture m8. We aren't america in that sense, niggers got the same culture as whites here, think the same way, follow the same religion and do the same shit as everyone else. A favela here isn't like an american ghetto where you only see people of one color on the contrary you see poor people there of all colors m8.
>So what I'm saying is don't change your culture, you are culturally Mediterranean so keep it that way, what 'm saying is economically change as you are a multiracial society therefore a socialist system like the Mediterranean nations wouldn't work in Brazil.
So I don't get it really, you say that niggers hinder our progress but at the sametime you say they behave the same as whites here? So why should we treat them different and not really follow a Mediterranean way to progress which envolves a strong government and state capitalism like Italy in 1880s

>read this

Not an argument

>on the contrary you see poor people there of all colors
el favelito srs jkjkjjkskjks

noooo jkasjaskjasj

We need to adopt a liberal system, not an interventionist model

Why did they let in a country that underwent like 10 years of consecutive negative growths?

Are they desperately looking for countries to bail out? Are they saints?

>hes still replying to the MAV
stop hell post the same images with the same shit everytime

>Fomos melhor no
mercado de trabalho, onde avançamos na margem mais fácil: colocar
as pessoas para trabalhar. Em suma, o Brasil avançou, mas poderia
ter avançado muito mais. Neste sentido a década foi perdida
KEK

Isn't Brazil in an economic crisis though

and by that i mean everything you say hell go NUH HUH LOOK AT THIS GROWTH

We are less than 5 years in recession. Brazil will grow again in 2017

>Why did they let in a country that underwent like 10 years of consecutive negative growths?
lol wat

yes cause you know GDP Growth means nothing haha

tl;dr: Brazil grew 10-20% less than it could in pretty much every single aspect during PT's reign, with many things like market competitiveness and education getting worse relative to other countries.
Subpar investment in both economic and human capital also left us with little "real" growth that translates to a sturdier country in general.

tl;dr tl;dr: populist shortsightedness

>econ.puc-rio.br/uploads/adm/trabalhos/files/td626.pdf
kek I am reading it, and it's basically saying from the beginning trying to prove before everything how Brazil hasn't grow as much as it should like Chile and other countries disregarding the sizes and politics of those countries and simply analitic comparing graphs and saying: SEE THIS IS HOW MUCH BRAZIL SHOULD HAVE GROWN SEE BRAZIL IS SHIT CAUSE IT HAS DONE NOTHING COMPARED TO THIS TINY SHITTY COUNTRY WHICH SOLD ITS SOUL FOR A BETTER GRAPHIC

see, not a single argument

Já que vão falar entre brasileiros que falem em português

>Subpar investment in both economic and human capital also left us with little "real" growth that translates to a sturdier country in general.
yeah, it's not like they have invested in universities or education at all amirite or had the biggest budget in education of all time

Yeah, you sure proved I am right by comparing GDP growth of totally different countries

im not even him but you literally have no argument but THIS BLOG TOLD ME THIS THEREFORE ITS GREAT
didi tu fez o enem mes passado oque que tu sabe

Brazilians genuinely believe Brazil is a superpower and first world.

Stop replying fucktard, I just posted the pdf and explained shit to the other user that asked about it, not to argue with the delusional MAV.

>im not even him but you literally have no argument
you haven't point out a single argument but your shitty pdf, and you haven't even explained to me what from it proves I am wrong, I even had the patience of reading it and analyzing it for you

>Stop replying fucktard, I just posted the pdf and explained shit to the other user that asked about it, not to argue with the delusional MAV.
Yeah I am sure you will understand how things work by sheltering yourself and not engaging in discussions and by simply posting a pdf and saying how wrong I am

Our government knew the risk. The only ones that could actually have an economic boom and be able to pay us quickly were Venezuela and Angola. Ironically, they're both far worse nowadays.
Also, Mexican GDP per capita surpassing ours is only a very recent event, 2014 IIRC.

Did you know that there is a faction (vide liberal) wanting to overthrow the Brazilian Republic and instituting a new one?

Now bring back the Empire of Brazil, Portugal and Algarves; kill every single favelado, rebuild our navy & military and we're ready for Mars.

Yes and we used to export as much as the whole of Mercosur combined, we still do more than Brazil today.

Say what you will but Mexican living standards were higher through much of the 20th century

Export =/= GDP

It's retarded to compare it to development.

Mexico isn't nearly as divided as Brazil though. You simply cannot cluster the entire country into one mainly because of said division.

Don't you worry Trump is going to destroy NAFTA

Why are you here, lad? The hue is not bothering anyone.

This other thread would have been more fitting for this desuarchive.org/int/thread/67922046/#67922046

But whatever floats your boat, I guess.

>Mexico isn't nearly as divided as Brazil though

By divisions you mean this, not the crap you posted.

We're talking about real economics, not teenage Sup Forums-themed garbage.

Brazil does not export practically anything, it does not import almost anything.

Imagine if Brazil become an anarcho-capitalist country? We would grow 20% a year

>real economics
>not intertwining with the way taxation and legislation in the country works
You are pathetic.

It has always been a back and fourth ride. We were better in the 19th century, between 1935 and 1970 and from the early 2000s up to 2014. In all timeframes left we were either tied or you were ahead of us.
Also, our economic history has been mostly about self-sufficiency for the last 90 years, it's only logical that Mexico would end up exporting more.

>You are pathetic.
2bqf you are for falling for such a weak bait

>It has always been a back and fourth ride.
Because of the political instability and the lack the rule of the law, due to the retarded amount of centralisation inherited from Portugal. No country that had more than 7 constitutions in 150 years can have a stable and steady economic growth.

>Brazil does not export practically anything
>unironically having one of the largest transcontinental markets in the world
Brazilian teenagers: the thread.

>Piauí
>aquele PISA
>aquela taxa se assassinatos
O que deu tão certo?

BRASIL É UM MERCADO FECHADO

FECHADO

F
E
C
H
A
D
O

SABE O QUE É ISSO?

Não tem assasinato se não tem habitantes.

>Because of the political instability and the lack the rule of the law, due to the retarded amount of centralisation inherited from Portugal. No country that had more than 7 constitutions in 150 years can have a stable and steady economic growth.
Everything will be solved when the South has its rightful hegemony!

E o que isso tem a ver com exportação?

2 SOLUÇÕES PARA O BRASIL

1 - DESMEMBRAMENTO DO PAÍS

2 - MONARQUIA PARLAMENTARISTA


QL É MAIS PROVÁVEL?

The mistake was thinking that colonies that were colonised like Hispanic America and had no cultural similarities could live under a centralised government. It's bound to fail. We are just delaying the inevitable and what should have happened already. Brazil being a political unity is as absurd as the former Spanish America being one too.