1. Flag
2. Your historical trigger
This piece of shit
1. Flag
2. Your historical trigger
This piece of shit
...
Hey if an Italian could rule France, then surely a Frenchman could rule Sweden
So a traitor, a betrayer, a deciever became king, and you believe it was ok ?
>deciever
Ohh, so you're the "sweden should've sided with france even though france invaded swedish Pomerania"-user?
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
No, but since he was brought to the throne by Swedish nobles who wanted to side with France to reclaim Finland, yeah id call him a deciever.
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Everything is your fault.
>Napoleon
>1.68m
MANLET
A
N
L
E
T
There was no way Sweden could have reclaimed Finland. We got our asses handed to us in 1809. The way he ushered in the era of Swedish neutrality (after taking the rightfully Swedish clay known as Norway, naturally) greatly benefited our country, which at the point was utterly poor and devastated from centuries of ultimately meaningless warfare.
It wasn't very strange either since Swedish monarchs and nobility (which had tried to save the French monarchy) have always adored French royalty, in particular the one before the traitor king, Gustaf III.