So what's the best type of Anarchy Sup Forums?

So what's the best type of Anarchy Sup Forums?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatism
youtube.com/watch?v=0RwlaNva_4g
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

None

transhuman anarchism best anarchism

Anarcho-Communism is the only non meme type of anarchy.

That said, anarchy in general is trash.

What is the orange one and the grey one?
They're all memes

Mutualism

At least Anarcho-commies have some credibility

the buried in a mass grave kind

the orange one I mean

...

Lolbertarianism
An anarcho capitalist society would of course not be functional but it is a good counterweight to todays status quo of extreme leftist ideology and globalism. I'd vote for a libertarian party.

gray is agroism

why wouldn't it function?

agorism*

>Anarcho-Communism
>extreme right wing
>extreme left wing
How does that even work

People are greedy and would abuse the shit out of the situation if there was no / very small government

That's like asking what is best type of cancer.

Nah actually that's unfair. Cancer doesn't actually implode on itself until it has killed its host.

Even so, only good anarchy could ever be is a benchmark on how the government deals with pretentious faggots.

How is this even remotely /x/?

None.

Anarchy is a retarded idea as a whole.

Lore of Shadows is the best one desu

Ancap is the best desu

>Anarchism
>Extreme right wing

nigga what?

The only way anarcho-anything works is if you're 1 guy alone on his own island. Any time there's a relationship of people in a community there will be hierarchy, it's the way human's relate to one another

None.
It is just a delusional fantasy.

Kek
Which credibility? Your culture is falling apart in front of you and want to giving them some credibility?

This

...

...

...

...

None. Fascism is the only way forward.

...

...

...

I prefer anarchism without adjectives, but if I had to choose I'd go with anarcho-pacifism.

Also fuck Ancaps they aren't anarchists.

bump

This. I used to go through mental gymnastics trying to rationalize Anarchism, but it's a fairytale. People making decisions on a local community level is still a form of government, and people living with a 'get off my lawn' mentality is ridiculous.

Khmer rogue best anarchism

Anarchy is shit.

>Anarcho-Communism
This.
Sad that anarchy actually can't be realised now since some people won't acting consciously with moral. Some fuckheads will do shit for sure cause
>lel, why should i work for the goods when i can just steal it?)0))
>lel, no police and shiet so i can do crime without punishment))0)
and it will be just a chaos instead of anarchy.

...

...

>Anarcho Monarchism

...

>He's not an anarcho-fascist

Mogadishu

>he's not an anarcho-statist

Both pretty good answers.
Have a rare pepe.

I actually find fascism pretty interesting though, still unclear about the economics of it which I plan to do more research on.

>Anarcho Shit
You may mean "feudalism"

>Mogadishu
Wut

Right wing is about wanting a small government. Left wing is for big governments.
Anarchism is the most far right ideology possible, as in an anarchy there is no government.

The entire right-left bullshit doesn't really work anyways. The left is authoritarian economically, yet liberal culturally/morally, and the right is the oposite. The original right-left distinction showed a pro-strong state to the right.

The point of anarcho-communism is that it's basically the same as communism, as the communism Marx predicted, was basically a state-less society, only seing the so-called "Proletarian dictatorship" for a long enough time to fend off any possible counter-revolutions by the borgeoisie. As soon as this danger, and the natural antagonism between the proletariat and borgeoisie disappeared as the classes of society dissappeared, the state too, would dissappear, leading the world into a global, anarcho-communistic world.

The main difference is that anarchists of the time saw the temporary dictatorship as unnecessary, and would rather see the state be removed effective immediately. Marx was basically an anarchist that predictet a short dictatorship.

It's not necessarily the size of the government, but about equality.
left = society works best when everybody is equal and everibody gets the same voice and input.
right = society works best through a hierarchy, be it by tradition or election or divine right
The left believes intervention is necessary to fight inequality and the right believes inequality is natural and good.

Right-left is relative though

Doesn't mean much at all. The "right" in Canada can still be an extreme left in another country.

Any thoughts on Voluntaryism?

...

a flat thing that stretches throughout thousands of square miles

of course it's a leaf

how is Voluntaryism fascist?

I'm not sure why I quoted your post

Literally the same shit as ancap

Your strawman isn't anarchy you dumb nigger

Woah...

>anarcho capaitalism
>not part anarchy

Except in that scenario they aren't free and, unlike socialism that breadsticks aren't funded with tax dollars.

...

If you aren't an anarchist you're either
A. An autist who wants to "rule over da insherior mashes with my shuperior euphoric interect"
Or
B. A cuck

...

There is no other anarchism beside anarcho-communism. Everything else is fake trash.

>the government and law appeared magically and everyone would all the sudden be "le evil" without it
There are far better arguments against anarcho capitalism yet everyone always comes up with the worst ones. In general anarchy, if you rape or murder someone there isn't anyone to stop the town from lynching you for it

What if you leave to the next town over?

You can put a bounty, or the people of town can go out to look for you. Also if the next town over finds out what did they probably won't like murderers or rapists either.

anarcho communism/ syndaclism.

Anarcho capitalism is Feudalism II: recreational nuclear boogaloo

Anarcho-cumminism/municipalism

What if a strong gang emerges that acts as the defacto government after a while?

I miss Mahkno.

Then that happens, I'm not an anarchist so I don't have an argument for how you keep anarchy from going to non - anarchy, but I don't see how that necessarily makes lack of anarchy something to be strived for or moral and anarchy something that necessarily shouldn't be strived for.

Anarcho-communism/municipalism

Besides the fact that it's retarded in every way?

Literally which part makes sense to you or do you think could work long term outside of a Utopia in lala land?

...

Anarcho-Anarchism

...

None of them

Has anyone who wasn't mentally retarded or some sort of societal reject ever unironically advocated for this shit?

I don't think I've ever heard or seen a well adjusted member of society say "DUDE we need like, no government. It'll be perfect and will work"

>not understanding to each their own according to their need

shit meme desu. Read Kropotkin

Pirate Party in Iceland.

Also

>not knowing what autonomy means

How to determine who needs what?

Can I need more than everyone else?

When has that ever worked with a group of more than 30 people?

that is exactly what happened

Ukranian free territory and Anarchist spain.

Also Rojava.

Yeah. If you want to keep your family healthy, want to build a project, need certain resources etc.

The only tolerable type of anarchy is in international relations, and only because we've found no legitimate alternative.

There is no civilised life without power and order. Anarchism as a political philosophy amounts to infantile, ineffectual whining. In my view, if anarchists don't like the state, then they should rebel - and be shown neither quarter nor mercy as enemies of civilisation.

What would happen if I formed gang in an anarchic society and we were the strongest around?

>still unclear about the economics of it
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatism
okay thats even worse than your mom dying

Depends. Most anarchists don't believe in opressive forms of heirarchy. Sounds like you've got a union of egoists.

What would your gang do? Provide protection? Sell non-lethal drugs? If you start harassing people and killing people within the community, people will get pissed and unite against you.

If you're like the black army on the other hand, people will respect you.

history

>he hasn't heard of autonomy

You've got some reading to do m8.

Here's a vid, this will give you the prinicples of anarchy.

youtube.com/watch?v=0RwlaNva_4g

>people will get pissed and unite against you.
Oh, so then there'll be a stronger gang.

kek

>most anarchists don't velieve in oppressive forms of hierarchy

But what is hierarchy is natural and we believe in it?

>What would your gang do?

We would establish a hierarchy through the use of violence.

>People will get pissed and unite against you

Will they also become a gang?

Well technically it'd be a shit load of unions forming against you, then people will go back to whatever they were doing.

That's because most non-meme anarchists don't say that.

Government is not the same as the state my dude.