Capitalism vs Communism

>show me the money

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=jVaWcDsEsVM
youtube.com/watch?v=ANiyo3Mlxzc
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>b-but this isnt muh real communism

there is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt

>money
but i see only paper

welcome to the real world goy

luxury communism when

...

shut up copter

>capitalism
Natural economics
>communism
nonsensical perversion endorsed only by an insane minority

capitalism rocks, dude!
youtube.com/watch?v=jVaWcDsEsVM

Humans are selfish -> capitalism
Humans are cucks -> communism

Fiduciary paper money* It does hold value

Well, as long as it backed by goods and services. Otherwise you get zimbabwe money.

you'd better to BELIEVE
youtube.com/watch?v=ANiyo3Mlxzc

...

that's fucking stupid whys it 10 bucks now

There's more money in existence, so it's worth less.

but it's still money

>Feudalism
>2000 years

>Capitalism
>Falling to shit after 150 years and constantly needing to be saved by itself by massive state intervention stealing from the working class to give to Too big to fail corporations.

We all know what the superior system is.

Why do you think the U.S. dollar is more valuable than zimbabwe money? Money has to be backed in something like gold (in the old days) or else it is worthless. So printing more money makes the existing money less valuable.

>because one form of an ideology failed, means that every form of it fails.

That's like saying if Austrian economics was implemented and faceplanted like it obviously would. All of Capitalism is debunked or because Athenian democracy failed, dictatorship is superior.

It is safe to day that Leninist Centrism is a failure, this does not mean all of Socialism is debunked though.

Honestly, Some form of Socialist economic system is inevitable with the coming automation of the workforce and development of advanced AI.

Money is backed by production.

The US can print as much money as it wants as long as it keeps positive growth because it's borrowing against the future and that borrowing allows for higher and higher growth.

Only when production and growth collapses, does debt become a problem.

If the money enters the market, yes it's less valuable. You could hold on to a gorillion dollars in your vault if you wanted to and the value of the dollar wouldn't plummet.

It's why gold's value plummeted like crazy when Mansa Musa was giving it out on his pilgrimage centuries ago.

Yep. But simply printing out money without growth or anything to back it up is what many countries do.

Yep das rite senpai

Socialism is just economic democracy.

Communism has no goal.
The reason left/pol/ is so much weaker than right/pol/ is because the left hasn't established a mainstream threat.
No one knows what the communists want, but everyone knows what the capitalist or nationalist wants.

...

nobody ever uses communism to refer to anything other than marxist-leninism