Disney pays its critics to give off good reviews

>Disney pays its critics to give off good reviews

It's not a billion dollar IP

Why was tomorrowland boo'd out of everywhere?

you idiot they can't shill every movie or else people will truly get suspicious, but if they pick their biggest titles that are expected to be popular, well received, and make money, then they don't have to worry about being found out

>tomorrowland wasn't supposed to be a big movie!
>fuck that 190 million budget movie!!
>higher budget than 90% of their marvel movies

>oh they only started to buy AFTER that came out!


>oh wait ultron came out before tomorrowland

...

your denial is literally proof that their plan works
those movies were necessary sacrifices, no chance any of them would make what their coloring book movies do anyway

Such a shame. If Lone Ranger focused on being fun with only an inobtrusive dramatic center it'd be great.

No one gives a fuck about these movies.They only pay for MCU and SW flicks.

Were you born before pirates of the caribbean?

Those scores are literally designed to be bad so it won't look like Disney is paying reviewers. It was decided from the start that those movies would be bad. That was the point. It's all a strategic buisness plan.

if Marvel and Lucasfilm were so smart, why don't they abandon Disney and go solo?

checkmate atheists

They pay to give average scores?

>Capt 80% 6.9 avg
>Thor 77% 6.7 avg
>Thor 2 66% 6.2 avg
>Hulk 67% 6.2 avg
>Iron Man 2 72% 6.5 avg
>Iron Man 3 79% 7 avg
>Ultron 75% 6.7 avg
>Antman 80% 6.9 avg

These are the majority of the MCU. The Disney/Marvel film franchise is not as glorified by the press as you all claim.

>designed to be bad
>strategic business plan

You're fucking delusional.

The failure of these would-be franchises is what pushed Disney to control pop culture news not proof that they don't have a marketing budget, retard

Yes obviously they would invest in good reviews for the first film in the Finest Hours Cinematic Universe.

Not really. The proof is in the pudding. All of those movies are so bad that they don't deserve average scores. It's clear they are paid reviews. Luckily they haven't gotten to all the reviewers yet though.

ITT: tinfoil faggots

These projects were all leftovers from the old model of blockbuster film making.

>It's clear they are paid reviews
Prove it.

>Ultron 75% 6.7 avg

That's much more than it deserves.

Tinfoil lost all it's meme power after Snowden.

Snowden's concerns are real, this is imagined.

>average scores are much more than they deserve

Then that is your opinion. You believe your views concerning these film to be fact?

>It's clear they are paid reviews. Luckily they haven't gotten to all the reviewers yet though.

You have no evidence to support this. This Disney conspiracy theory stems from nothing more than the fact that you can't understand why the press has dissenting views from you when it comes to taste in films.

>understand

A more appropriate term would be "cope."

JJ Abrams brought them this strategy (he invented it for Star Trek Into Darkness and used it against Man of Steel) and Disney's only been using it for capeshit (so far)

and that pic proves it

Its in all of the pics of RT scores. You're just too stupid and blind to see it.

The evidence is in the pictures. Seriously. If someone sued thats all they would need to win the case.

It's more likely when there is a Disney animated movie or Marvel capeshit coming out, people would be much nicer to them than those without the Disney logo by their names.

Reminder that Masketta Man is in this.

I'm loving these new "paid review" threads and find them very entertaining.

Occam's razor, you fuckwit.