Jesus Christ

Jesus Christ

>Lines of dialogue
>one-liners are considered dialogue

>says the twitterfag

>Martha

is this dialogue?

How come BvS felt way too bloated and like it didn't know how to handle its story with only 3 heroes (two of which who don't even have any real dialogue) while CW feels so much more coherent and structured with a dozen of heroes (one of them even having his origin story as a subplot)

I felt the opposite way. Watching BvS, I was able to follow along perfectly. Civil War was enjoyable but they went a little far with all the plot threads. I was struggling to give a shit about everything that was unfolding.

>dialogue
>quips

one is in DC movies, the other is in marvel.

>trying to judge a film in a quantifiable way
>a film that followed storytelling 101 of 'show dont tell' gets criticised for showing instead of telling
>I guess Max was the worst part in Mad Max
>I guess silent films are terrible

>>a film that followed storytelling 101 of 'show dont tell' gets criticised for showing instead of telling
Is that why Lex kept explaining the allusions in the film to the viewer?
Because Snyder wanted to show, not tell?

>show don't tell
>Lex Luthor literally explains everything right as it happens like some shitty Anime side character

?????

Because bvs needed to establish all of those characters and give us a reason to care about a conflict between them, whereas Civil War has spent nearly a decade and like 20 movies doing that so they had time to focus on developing a narrative instead.

No
Jesus Christ no. Even as someone who enjoyed BvS I have to admit that it was unnecessarily and retardly convoluted for no reason

If a character says something out loud, to another character(s), it is dialogue.

Yet they managed to make Black Panther compelling and made us care about him despite being a newly introduced character to a well established cast

>convoluted
Sorry your not smart enough for complex plots user, even if it wasnt that complex

You can understand something and still see that it is convoluted, you sad, angry little DCuck

CW was infinitely more complex and had many more aspects to it.
CW manages to tell a complex and convolutef story in a simple and straightforward way, BvS does the opposite. It takes a simple and straight forward story and tells it in a complex and convoluted way to make it SEEM complex but in reality it was just lacking substance.

It's easy to see how CW could've been a pire confusing clusterfuck. The more amazing it is to see a coherent story coming out of it. With BvS the premise was so simple it was hard to see how you would manage to fuck it up, yet Snyder still managed to do it.

>BP got over his thirst for vengeance in a more believable fashion than Batman
Synder can fuck off
>having to watch Batman's origin again

you sound like the angry one to me

see

Can you imagine actually feeling loyalty to a movie studio and a director for hire? Who are these people?

What exactly was hard to follow in CW? The movie did an extremely well job at letting you know what was exactly happening right now and why it happened

>It's a "shit some no name fuck on twitter says" thread

They're a combination of angry neckbeards who hate Marvel/DC, and falseflagging capeshit haters

>"is she with you?"

even DC's quips are terrible, Suicide Squad is gonna be interesting

seriously though, i like DC comics and i want DC movieverse to succeed as well as Marvel, but i really hate what Snyder has done to Superman and his movies in general, except Watchmen, that was good

>Because bvs needed to establish all of those characters and give us a reason to care about a conflict between them,
It didn't need to establish them tho. And giving a reason to care about the conflict should have been the narrative.