How do Catholics feel about following this cuck pope?

How do Catholics feel about following this cuck pope?

John Paul II is dead

>Peaceful non-cuck statement vs a zoologist trying to be tough and warmongering

JP 2 was the best and cunts like Dawkins can suck it.

You're not gonna find a Catholic who dislikes John Paul II

I don't even believe in god anymore but I still think JPII is based as fuck

Fuck off, this picture just shows how out of touch with everything liberals are

JPII isn't liberal you doofus

John Paul the second is the worst thing that happened to the Catholic Church in the 20th century I kid you not

So you think if Jesus lived today he would be all like MY FOLLOWERS GET UP INTO ARMS GAS THE KIKES AND SANDNIGGERS RACE WAR NOW ?

Why?

The only part in which he was was his theory on the market in a Catholic nation.

He stated the liberal economy theory is the right one if you add a bit of social help for the poor but not as much as in socialism where people are discouraged to work. Help for the poor should be done through activization not free gibs which causes them to remain lazy (and because sloth is a sin).

Saint JP II was based as fuck even if someone is not a Catholic.

The whole kids abussing thing it's because of him bro. He was a servile puppet that ruined the Church in the eyes of the whole world just to defend a bunch of rich pedos.

>A fucking degenerate pole talking about free gibs
Stop defending pedophiles and have some self respect you literal nigger

And do you have any proof it was his work?

The Church is a huge institution and the Pope dosn't have unbound power in it you fucking nigger, mong, favela dweller.

Jesus was a proto-Ayran man so it would make sense that he would feel kinship with Europeans plight against multiculturalism

But probably not as verbose

in text, islam and christianity carry many of the same ideologies and moral principles

the only thing making islam more violent and draconian is the fact that the majority of muslim nations are impoverished, and filled with more desperate people in hostile situations sometimes

christianity on the other hand is nearly exclusively practiced by the majority of a population in developed nations that are peaceful, very wealthy, etc

when quality of life gets better, tying a lifestyle to religious scripture just seems more and more pointless, but when life is rough and unforgiving, religion becomes a pillar for the strength of a society (for a christian example, check out the early 13 colony settlers and their strict and harsh practices of christianity)

Ahh yes my brother all those who accept Islam are peaceful. Once we rid the world of the infidel all will be at peace.

The pope gets reports from his secretaries. A direct secretary on this matters for John Paul was chilean. Try to fool anyone but not us fucker. John Paul hide the whole thing and ratzinger was supposed to deal with it but it drove him nuts. That's why a nobody was elected, so they could just get rid of him, but they didn't know that the absolute madman was going to actually take care about it. The guy is a hardcore jesuist and they thought they could bought him. Good ridance.

btw, I'm sorry about saying that you are a literal nigger it was just my obvious reaction after checking your flag and my experience with it.

>So you think if Jesus lived today he would be all like MY FOLLOWERS GET UP INTO ARMS GAS THE KIKES AND SANDNIGGERS RACE WAR NOW ?
nah, i think he would act like a roman age judean, which was just as tribal, xenophobic and protective of their own kin and people as any others in the region

this Dawkins quote is like the realization of average 18 year old guy, can't believe it took him 70 years to figure it out

>one choirboy has been deposited on your cock

Is there some sort of a raport? I'd gladly read it.

This
"I came not to bring peace, but to bring a sword"

>in text, islam and christianity carry many of the same ideologies and moral principles
>the only thing making islam more violent and draconian is the fact that the majority of muslim nations are impoverished, and filled with more desperate people in hostile situations sometimes

gross over simplification

>when quality of life gets better, tying a lifestyle to religious scripture just seems more and more pointless, but when life is rough and unforgiving, religion becomes a pillar for the strength of a society (for a christian example, check out the early 13 colony settlers and their strict and harsh practices of christianity)

then why do so many muslims living in highly developed countries like Sweden and Germany support terrorism

>one afghan singing boy has been deposited on your cock

I have mixed feelings on Richard Dawkins myself, so I can understand why he might have mixed feelings regarding Christianity.

Regardless, based Francis is cleaning up the mess as best as as a based Pope from 'da h00d can.

Google search is widely known. It's years of reports and admin work that he signed. You can not sign shit for 3 years not knowing what you are signing

Wouldn't Muslims like John Cuck? He seemed to like sucking their cocks verbally.

Well considering that atheists reject Christianity based on logic and reason, I don't see why an atheists would suddenly drop those concepts to go to Islam unless they're just an edgy faggot trying to get attention.

I did and this is what I got(for example):
>"I don't think Pope John Paul understood" the "cancer" of clergy sexual abuse immediately, said Navarro-Valls, adding: "I don't think anyone did."
>But, the former spokesman said, once John Paul II became aware of the scope of the accusations being made against clergy, especially around the time of reporting on the Boston archdiocese in 2002, he "immediately" began taking action.
>Specifically, Navarro-Valls said, procedures against Maciel "began during the pontificate of John Paul II."
>"The pope knew that the investigation was underway but was not informed of the results" because it was only concluded as he was dying in 2005, Navarro-Valls said.
That's just a exaple though.

John Paul was soft-hearted to a fault, in my opinion. He wanted everyone to get along, and he wanted a kinder Catholic Church, but a reformer he was definitely not. His worst flaw, in my opinion. Sometimes you can't be everyone's friend, nor can you get everyone to act decently to one another.

Sometimes, you just gotta wade in and start busting heads to right those wrongs.

JP II was 10 times tougher than the Pope we got now. He extended his hand but never humililated himself.

I have mixed feelings regarding him because I feel that in his old age he's starting to reason more based on cultural comfort than cold, hard reality. He actually attends Anglican Church services sometimes, did you know that?

This, despite the fact I am rather certain he would not set foot in a local mosque (should there be one).

>gross over simplification
not really, in desparate situations, almost anyone i know would look to religion to solve their problem
imagine waking up everyday in a shitty situation

>then why do so many muslims living in highly developed countries like Sweden and Germany support terrorism
because many of these people have either recently immigrated from these places, or are children of these people and are ingrained to an extent with their parent's religious fervor
a change in scenery and luxury doesn't change a man or his principles overnight

I don't believe that for a minute. Growing up in fucking Rio is no goddamned picnic. Nor is turning the Vatican Bank inside out something one does for appearance's sake.

I'm a lawyer. Believe me, we can make a thre word poem reading last a hundred years. I'm not just taking a shit on him just because. He knew, and he delayed it on purpose. Srsly, you can not defend him on this matter because of national pride. I'm talking as a Catholic.

catholics are fucking pathetic

Thanks unironically for the informative comments
They're very rare especially considering the subject matter

Their sincerity is to be admired, if nothing else.

John Paul II was the best pope. Fuck you.

Calla animale

I'm a lawyer as well, hopefully a PHD soon as well. I know that one needs proof before pointing fingers and that big institutions aren't run by 1 person.
As far you showed me that you have 0 proof, and that you have no idea how a big institutions are run, be it a international corp in which I'm working or the Church..

The burden of proof is on your side and I'm still waiting for you to deliver.

*hopefully a PHD soon

Posting from work is kinda shit.

Jurassic Park 2 sucked, bro.

>saying shit about the pope

I'm largely in Dawkin's camp, but still recognize the value of keeping an eye on an institution with such real power in so many countries.

And I really do pity Richard. It's obvious that as a man from a different era there are some things he'll just never be able to think around, and I'm not necessarily talking about his views on Islam.

*Dawkins'

quite bad, seeing as how in christian theology as far as i'm aware muslims go to hell (since they don't believe in the death of Jesus)