Wouldst thee liketh toeth liveth deliciouslyeth?

>Wouldst thee liketh toeth liveth deliciouslyeth?
What did he mean by this?

Other urls found in this thread:

strawpoll.me/10203193
rottentomatoes.com/m/star_wars_episode_vii_the_force_awakens/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>Be american
>talk to goats

he meant give me your soul and you get unlimited steak and blowjobs.

doesn't sound like a bad deal, to be honest.

He meant he wanted to have you for dinner. Get it, HAVE you for dinner like, does he mean have you over, or actually eat you? One of many mysteries of this kinography.

>not a native English speaker
>understand every dialog just fine
>then motherfucking Black Phillip starts talking
>feel like I'm missing half of the movie because I suddenly can't understand shit

Pretty cool movie. I liked how you really felt the terror and helplessness the family experienced. I always dig that.

Alsoeth, whyeth didst heeth speaketh liketh thist?

What does the title card say? "A New England Folktale". It's not meant to be ambiguous or complicated. Think of it like you're being told a story at bedtime or in a classroom. The movie has a very straightforward lesson.

What's the first scene in the movie? William think he's better and more pious than the village counsel, and says he's happy to be banished. This leads directly to his baby being kidnapped. He ignores this and ignores that his wife is beside herself with misery because of his actions.

The movie is mostly a catalogue of his lies and hypocrisy and how his poor example spreads to the rest of the family. He lies constantly, about the cup, about hunting, and encourages also his son to lie, even as he tells him to memorize how his soul is riven with sin. Even his baby is filled with sin, in his mind, yet the sin we witness is his constant hypocrisy.

Things spiral out of control. The children accuse each other, but only because they've learned how to lie for their own safety when convenient, and out of a sense of real danger that their parents will harm them if they're found to be consorting with the devil. They're right to turn on each other! It's only natural in a house as mad as this.

The father dies, killed by Black Phillip. Why does he accept his death? "Corruption, thou art my father".

And so Thomasine, left with nothing, turns to the only source of authority and shelter left to her: the evil present in the house. But they had every chance to turn away from evil, to scorn hypocrisy. They didn't.

So what's the moral of the story? False piety is no substitute for moral substance. Very straightforward, very unambiguous.

Wasn't it explained at the end?
Most of the text is copied from old ass books written by people that experienced those encounters.

good post my man or woman

>it's an english native speakers don't understand when thou and thee are used respectively episode

He meant that you're gay if you like anal. Seriously, you are.

This.

I'll never have the passion to think about that kinda stuff.

But if the family is being punished because of the fathers lies, why is jailbait spared?

Not when you repeat "no homo though" throughout the act.

>it's an user puts a lot of effort into a controversial opinion he doesn't really hold just to get replies episode

I bet you're the same guy who pretends that Chuck is right in the BCS threads.

this. american """"""education""""""""

The VVVVVVVVitch.

>It's an english native speaker uses "respectively" erroneously episode.

She's not. She's lost her soul.

It's pasta. But feel free to point out what's wrong with it.

reminder that satan's favorite physical form to take is a goofy outfit that will only make sense 200 years from whatever time he happens to be speaking with somebody

Nothing is more delicious to the devil than a pure maid giving in to her desires. Also the old Thomasine is dead now.

>implying i'm a native speaker

what whould have been correct? "thou and thee respectively"?

>a controversial opinion

uhh

Was the rabbit Satan as well, or was it the witch?

the goat will be eating her delicous roast beef

How is this controversial?

They're not referencing anything a sequence or coming from 2 characters etc, to which it would have applied, so it could have been wholly excised.

>It's pasta. But feel free to point out what's wrong with it.

Ok well its just a movie ok, its not a critical analysis doesnt need everything

She dons a hare to michief make
Dries milk to blood ere day will brake

>he saw through my plan but I really want the argument so I'll keep baiting

Not the guy that posted it, but you're having a poor showing here buddy. Take this thread off the watch list, take the L, and move on.

Was butter a delicacy back then?

are you sure YOU know how respectively works?

doesn't it generally follow "A and/or B respectively" (in this case "thou and/or thee") meaning "each on its own terms/seen as a seperate case"?

t. germanfag who may be totally wrong

Among the Goat-kino I prefer this Cohen wannabe, the bits with Bridges are great.

classic

black phillip really stole the show, the rascal

>"Do you like butter?"
Not memeing, what did he mean by that?
Was butter even invented in 1650?

You and he are retarded and gay respectively.

Jon Ronson is pretty good

Basically. Getting and keeping one cow would be prohibitively expensive for most families.

They wanted to include him in way more scenes but he didn't really want to cooperate.
He's a real troublemaker.

All the other animals were behaving very well.

>it's an english native speakers don't understand when thou and thee are used, instead of you(subject of verb) and you(object of verb), respectively episode

I'm not a native English speaker either, but ignoring other faults in the sentence, that's how you use "respectively" in your original post.

Generally, I don't know, usually its for differentiation, but your use may be appropriate too. Just seems clunky or extraneous.

i still think it's correct without your addition

yea but it was super fuckin expensive to the point of almost having to be ruling class level rich to have it on a regular basis

and to think within a few hundred years we now have videos where people challenge eachother to eat as much butter as possible for fun

>it's a "I am the guy that posted it, but I'm pretending not to be because I got BTFO" episode

The word is redundant, simply a display of your vocabulary. Its use makes you sound pseudointellectual.

>Decadent kings of old laying on the divan, suckling on grapes a peasant could only dream of.

Now I can go to the supermarket and buy a big vine of them for 1.99. Get fucked Caligula.

And assuming that was true, which it's not, where exactly was the BTFO?

>it's an user feigns ignorance episode

Full of chemicals and shit though. They had the real stuff back then.

got it. translation problem. the german equivalent is much more inconspicuous.

That's what I thought.

>Get fucked Caligula

topkek

What happened here?

Is black Phillip just the witch?

Guessing black phillip is one of the witchs familiars

It's the witch sucking the blood out of the goats udder.
Black Phil was some demon or even Satan the witch maybe evoked in him.

I wasn't sure if that was the goat transforming/changing forms, or if an entirely separate witch.

no. the witches are the ones dancing around the fire in the wood. black phil was also there enjoying the scenes so hes probably a avatar of satan

You use it only if you're applying one list to another, such as:

Dogs and cats like to chase cats and mice, respectively.

That means the dogs like to chase the cats, and the cats like to chase the mice. Without "respectively" we would assume dogs chase cats and mice and cats chase cats and mice.

>don't understand when thou and thee are used

No distinction is being made between thou and thee, so using respectively makes no sense. This would make sense:

It's an english native speakers don't understand when thou and thee are used as archaic subjects and objects, respectively, episode.

You're applying thou (first item in the first list) to subjects (first item in second list) and thee to objects but not thou to objects or thee to subjects.

seeing as he was also the one to get the qt to sign the contract. doubt a witch could that on behalf of ol lucifer

But you could see her ankle through the cracks in the wall and she was also on top of the stable.

Oh yeah. Thanks.

I watched this moving too late at night, or lesst I was too tired.

So what is Sup Forums's concensus on this?

Poll: strawpoll.me/10203193

...

Must've been pretty rad to be a witch back then.

i like this kind of horror movie, one that is mostly subtle with a few scenes of shere wtf.

The Thing is the greatest of this style of movie.

at last i truly see

>goat thread on Sup Forums

thank you VVitch

He's a pack goat. Don't trust them.

You can negate all that bullshit, by using the correct symbol to differentiate the pairs of subjects; though the form is rarely used anymore:

>Dogs & cats like to chase cats & mice.

It has to do with placement of subjects around the &. The above is:

>Dogs like to chase cats.
>Cats like to chase mice.

Incorrectly, it would be, where one set is transposed:

>Dogs & cats like to chase mice & cats.

Which would result in:

>Dogs like to chase mice.
>Cats like to chase cats.

The use of, "respectively," became more commonplace.

>based Patrice
>lived deliciously
>cult of black Phillip

I...is he in hell Sup Forums?

This might be one of my favorite movies now. I can't stop watching it.

>VVitch

why not? that's literally what W represents, only a bit contracted. nowhere near as cringey as forced shit like TAK3EN, SE7EN etc

VVhat's the Þroblem?

>mfw I found out the movie title was supposed to be pronounced as "the vee vee itch"

Can agree that this is better than The Village?

if butter was so rare then how was everyone always churning butter back then?

lol this, I said the "Which" to people who were like, "the fuck, this guy?" Only after my film professor spoke about it did I get why I sounded so stupid.

thomasin was the witch all along?

That's an olde euphemism for masturbation. Everything was so bleak and boring people where sneaking off to "churn butter" whenever they could, alone or in groups.

Don't even bring up that blunder

I didn't know that, but a) I feel like not enough people know about that distinction to make worthwhile, and b) I don't like how it puts symbolism into writing.

no

why am i the only one who voted "it was shit"

are people nowadays afraid to talk shit about a movie if critics give it good scores?

"hurr durr you don't understand art"

the movie was awful

Asked this in a dead thread, but

If everyone in the family represented the seven deadly sins, what the hell did the twins and the baby do?

they weren't americans at the time. they were british citizens
yuropoor """"""""""""""""education"""""""""""""""""""

>this image

disgusting. i bet she smells like wet dog

why are you so upset that you have a minority opinion?

you feel insecure and have to deflect it onto something else like "you are pandering to critics" on fucking Sup Forums.

thats one of the dumbest things ive seen here for a while.

I didn't read your post in any sense.

roll

Caleb - lust
Mom - wrath
Father - pride
So, some combination of sloth, greed, gluttony, and envy. But I don't really see it. If anything, probably just sloth and gluttony for being little shits all around.

...

>no Black Philip

This needs editing.

...

This isnt se7en buddy.

Don't worry, user. I stray from RT critics' consensus often enough: rottentomatoes.com/m/star_wars_episode_vii_the_force_awakens/

get a load of this faggot

are you literally retarded? i'm just stating that the movie doesn't deserve the praise it gets

you better not start this shit again