Racist

>Racist
Check

>Sexist
Check

>Homophobic
Check

>Islamaphobic
Check

>Transphobic
Check


Why did he win again?

Other urls found in this thread:

dcdave.com/article5/140329.htm
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

he's not transphoic though he supported transgender people picking which bathroom they wanted ot use. he's not homophobic either - or atleast he hasn't said anything untoward the lgbt community. it's mike 'smack a dyke' pence who wants to fry the fruits.

>homophobic
>transphobic

Hello, CNN.

because le epic pol meme magic xDDD

praise kek etc etc

>Transphobic
Not true.

>>Racist
>Check
Pretty debatable
>>Sexist
>Check
>>Homophobic
>Check
Wrong
>>Islamaphobic
>Check
>>Transphobic
>Check
Wrong

all good qualities desu

not an argument xDDDDD

le pol le kek praise lmaaaaao xDD^^

I know you're being facetious but the burden of proof is on the original poster, who offered zero proof even for things that are generally known to be false.

why not make a point yourself and show who's the adult?

>fry the fruits

even the left leaning Snopes debunked that.

>le Sup Forums boogyman
>le not an argument
where are the arguments?

I don't le know? xD
Also you le forgot le reddit boogeyman xDDDD^^

He's none of those things, but he should be, because they're all objectively correct and exactly what America needs. People voted for him because, on some level, they recognise this; and while Trump doesn't actually fit the bill, he's a damn sight closer than anyone else who was running.

You've just answered your question ma mate

Good one, you really sealed your argument there.

because he's a great guy, he is talented and up to par for the job, he says things like they are and you can stick all your buzzwords where the sun doesn't shine.

Trump victory best day of my life.

>even the left leaning Snopes

ah yes the cat-lady

because none of those things are bad

This

Does anyone honestly, ignoring virtue signaling, actually like the majority of black people and faggots? Honestly?

...

it's bad. Tolerance brings a piece to the world while nazi stupid faggots are only able to ruin it and kill each other. Theres no difference between guys from isis and nazi. they are the same stupid apes.

>Homophobia is bad and for nazis
>Uses Homophobic slur

What did he mean by this?

>useless buzzwords
check

Cuck.

Get flooded by chinks

You've been Jewed Russia. You've been Jewed very hard.

A piece of what?

>I don't like what I read
>it's the Jews

Kinda getting old that. Try Aliens again.

Anglos are an evolutionary failure. You literally fought to destroy your own race for shits and giggles. The eternal cuck.

Communist propaganda is Jewish. Feminism, homosexual normalization, cultural marxism. It's all Jewish. Communism is entirely Jewish. But whites will rise again to dominate.

A smart man has no virtues.

That's what I said before.
No need to parrot the exteneded version of your ramdonly associated "explanation".

You seem to lack perspective of historical concepcts like martricarchy or homossexuality.

But clearly you can explain why Cuba reconigzes Palestine and the USA don't, right?

Swedes. The most brainwashed Communist blonde black dick suckers on Earth.

>But clearly you can explain why Cuba reconigzes Palestine and the USA don't, right?

Palestine doesn't exist tho

fuck drumpf and fuck white people

Matriarchy? Something that has never existed in humans you mean? Cuba is not connected to the original Jewish Soviet Jews in anyway. Cuba is Communist but it is an offshoot. And not all Jews believe the same ideas however a lot of these ideas were pioneered by Jews.

>Anglos
>White
Anglos are to whites as whites are to the other races -- that is, we are their superiors.

wtf I hate Dr*mpf now

You're faggots.

Why did you fear Germans then?

>Shitposting

Sad!

Trump is A+, sod off limey

>what is the Cuban-Missile Crisis

Hahahahahahahahahah
Seriously, stick to short maymays.

Yeah, like city "people" aren't the worst of the three groups

He won because the opinions on various matters, that we are exposed to through popular news and social media, do not actually reflect the views of the wider populace.

I'm so sick of people online and in person spouting all this shit about "How could he win??? He's against 'x' and he supports 'y'". The growth of the internet and sites such as Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, Tumblr and even Sup Forums have opened up more avenues of communication around the world than ever in the past, and yet we all just surround ourselves with the things we want to hear and block out anything negative.
You look at the things Trump stands for and you disagree with them, the people you are friends with also disagree, your facebook friends largely disagree, and the media you consume disagrees with them because they are the popular, politically correct narrative.

Because we are so rarely exposed to contrasting opinions, (or we can easily dismiss such opinions as racist/sexist/bigoted/stupid etc because they disagree with us) we are suddenly shocked when things don't turn out how we expected them, and we start to fling shit around looking for someone to blame because "we were so obviously right and this shouldn't have happened".

The simple fact is, a large portion of American society (the part that voted him in) do not see these issues the way you do. What you find "clearly unacceptable" may be perfectly reasonable to another person (or if not reasonable, then at least not an important factor in deciding their vote).

TL;DR: The wider populace doesn't share your social-media fuelled equality crusade. Just deal with it, go back to your safe space and move on.

What is Jews had already been kicked out of the Soviet Union. Jews were the original creators. Lenin, Trotsky, Marx. Stalin took over and made it a simple dictatorship.

>took over and made it a simple dictatorship

Sounds like the kind of freedom the USA can stand behind.

what did he mean by this

I'm completely free here though. I actually have freedom of speech. I don't think you do. Look how your inferior monkey brain is totally unable to come up with an intelligent response. Brown Brazilian monkey genetic feces.

this

My government also isn't centrally planned. Disgusting socialist. What we really need is no government. But I can only dream.

Those buzzwords are dumb.
If nobody can even agree on a clear cut definition, then there probably aren't surch thing in the first place.

>people making an honest discussion on Sup Forums over a bait post

Economy*

Because his opponent was a pathetic candidate.

As someone unbiased who witnessed everything from the sidelines, I'm glad he won. It seems like this guy actually is motivated to change shit and isn't after money - unlike Hillary who literally spews out shit that's trending, flip flopping all over the place to please everyone. That bitch tryna made it into a popularity contest, her attempts at winning over the youth vote was cringy as fuck and only shows she wasn't trying to win them over with actual plans, just by being "Chillary" she expected people to like her and shit.

dumb leaf

He's just a paid shill for Israel.

>I'm completely free here though

Hahahahahahaha. You can't even drink alcohol in public places like normal grown ups.

>drinking alcohol in public is a good thing

the only thing he is out of these is "islamophobic", however this isn't bad because most muslims are fanatics.

Because we need those things now more than ever

+1

>disliking retarded clerical fascism is a phobia
why did it get to this
why are the """liberals""" in support(or at least not opposed to)of actual fashy ideals?

Because he noticed the people that lost all their jobs due to Obamas funny free trade policies and climate change combat policies. He talked to them and that's why he won. HRC didn't give a shit about Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin which is why she lost

>omg you gotta vote for me but I'll axe your jobs once I'm in office :DDD
>vote for me because first woman president thanks!

He campaigned in those states while she was busy going to fundraisers with some shitty celebrities and talking down on the american people.

"hes got lot of money so maybe we can have lot of money too!"

>no gets
Really makes you think

>governors are baby sitters of the free

Germany in both wars wanted to steal our colonies, you idiot.

Well we did it bitch. America is ours. And soon the world.

Thank you for the upvote, I hope to make it to the top comment soon.

>people should be free to make their own decisions instead of maintaining a clean and healthy society

Lets see some oranges getting juiced by China, shall we?

>i trust my government to maintain a clean and healthy spciety when those in power would do better with a retarded desperate voterbase

Really the nations of the 20th century should be seen as falling in to three groups: traditional imperial powers (Britain, France), aspiring imperial powers (Germany, Italy, Japan), and anti-traditional powers (America and Russia).

The clever thing for the traditional imperial powers to do would have been to team up with the aspiring imperial powers to destroy the anti-traditional powers.

That is, the British and French should have sided with Germany, Italy and Japan in order to wipe the U.S.S.R. and the U.S.A. off the face of the Earth.

That's exactly what Hitler wanted but the Anglos weren't having it.

The funny thing is, I really don't think that most Americans are racist/sexist/transphobic/islamaphobic/homophobic like plenty of 4channers are and I am (to a point).

They lost because, despite all the media shilling to paint the opposite ("right wingers are the crazy erratic ones"), the left was fucking ABSURD these last few years.
So many attacks, so much baseless accusation, so many displays of childish tantrums, that they lost so much of their average American support by letting college SJWs run their dialogue. They spent all their time screaming and attacking that they simply couldn't make enough level-headed Americans believe they had the most agreeable ideology.

>Islamaphobic
>phobia is an irrational
>as if there is anything irrational about fearing a bunch of facist, inbred retards that follow a medieval death cult that was designed to keep medieval societies in check

That's a good way to look at it. I've never thought of it that way. But Hitler considered Anglos and Germans brothers and I'm sure he'd have liked to align with Britain.

Most Americans are weak slaves at this point.

Also America basically let the Reds cement their hold on Russia on purpose by betraying everyone (worst of all, the Czechoslovak Legions) who was ready to go in and help the Whites take their country back.

And then F.D.R. and his communist advisors helped the U.S.S.R. to become a serious contender for world power, probably unwittingly on F.D.R.'s part, but deliberately on the part of his advisors.

America is literally the most evil country ever to have existed. Winning all this power and dominance for itself through dirty tricks would be fine - this sort of thing is to be expected in international relations. The problem is that America took control of the world and then set about destroying it with insane ideologies and degeneracy, none of which actually benefited America at all. America's game plan seems to have been to force a collective suicide on civilisation itself. Maybe you can blame bad politicians or Jewish manipulators or whatever else, but the fact is that America was the state that caused all this trouble.

This is why as an anti-American foreigner, I like Trump (at least, what he has been said to represent). He represents probably the last opportunity for America to change its evil ways, and put its power to good use.

Because America held the purse-strings.

They're eating themselves lmao

In Toronto for example BlackLIvesMatter and the Fag pride parade had some "disputes". It's all going to well, just a little longer and the Gays will hate the Feminists who will hate the Fags who will hate the Trannies, who will hate the Muslims, who will hate the blacks and so on.

>leftist OP triggered

Check

Had Germany aligned with England it's possible white Americans would have become totally Nazified.

I'm not NatSoc, but he loved England+Scotland on the basis that he thought that, being Germanic ethnicities, they had the all the prerequisites to join his ethnic superclub.
He said that they were ZOG, run by Jews, and were misguided, not that they were bad folks or untermensch.

Was American leadership not still Anglo at that point? This is why I say World War 2 was a war of white suicide. It was a mistake that has kept us from progressing.

You know Edward VIII might have gone for it, too, but that awful American woman forced him off the throne.

Kind-of-sort-of but not really. There were plenty of Jews involved, but most gentiles were either not properly conscious, or else moral perverts who supported the destructive agenda. This guy has written a decent summary.
dcdave.com/article5/140329.htm

That's because the ideals were created by Jews. America is the Neo Weimar Republic. Jews leave Germany after the war come to America and immediately destroy it like they had Germany before.

A woman cannot lead a nation. We need male leaders and not ones that are orange and can't grow a beard. We need masculine male leaders. We need a real white male patriarchy.

The allies did I really good job of performing evasive maneuvers in the wake of the Nazi rise to power in Germany.
Hitler was Time Magazines Man of the Year, Mosley was awful popular, Americans were sympathetic to Germany in WW1 until events like the Lusitania.

It's incredible really, how the Anglo powers-that-be used the far-left as a tool to beat back the far-right, then turn on the far-left one they had been victorious.

I'm no Nazi, but I really wonder how much of the events were dictated by international financing groups and RealPolitik rather than just "racist are bad, m'kay"

I like the term "Weimerica".

That said, I think a lot of America's German-origin Jews were pre-WWII, and many of the post-WWII ones seem to have come from Slavic lands.

Never mind that there had been some real moral and cultural decline in America even before the war.

I completely agree. Trump is a very small, very shaky first step, but at least not in entirely the wrong direction.

>rather than just "racist are bad, m'kay"
Literally nobody gave half a shit about this.

>so many displays of childish tantrums

But those ain't particular of one political inclination.
Just look at or the so much adressed Donald Trump twitter. Tantrums are often praised as "waw, he speak his mind" for the ordinary person in general.

It seems to be taken out of context. He could mean that germans are warmongers and must be destroyed to end the misery they create, no matter their leader or ideology.

Which, after WWI, is a sensible point.

The Slavic ones are the ones who were Bolsheviks.

It couldn't mean that because he said "even in the hands of a Jesuit priest."

He might have seen them as a threat to his own interests is more like.

Agreed on this.
But the pic implies un this context that there was no ideological ambivalence or that Churchill was not negative towards NatSoc. It might be more complicated.

>no matter their leader or ideology.

The thing is he's saying their "strength", not the race itself. In my view the suggestion is that if Germany is allowed to be strong, it will be a threat. Remember that history did not start with the First World War, either. Germany was always warlike and it had been on the ascendant pretty much non-stop from the time it was unified.

The fact is that German ambition was the chief threat to Britain. The British jealously guarding their place atop the globe (and the French sharing such interests) was the other key factor in that conflict, of course, but that's not a problem for the British but for everyone else. There might have been no war if Germany had settled for third place (or even equal-second) in the pecking order, but they genuinely thought they could win.

Even outside the context of WWI, a large, industrial, martial neighbour is dangerous even if you are working with them and consider them allies. So even if the British had allied with the Germans in WWII, there would have been an incentive to keep them from getting too strong and becoming a serious contender for dominance (although by this stage Britain was in deep trouble anyway and really should have been more worried about America than about Germany).

That's not to say that I agree with what Churchill actually said, but to present it as a call to kill all Germans is disingenuous.

You really don't get it, do you?

Trump said things that hurt your feelings
Leftists attack a rally in Cincinnati
Trump said things that hurt your feelings
Leftists burn down buildings in the wake of another dindunuffin
Trump said things that hurt your feelings
Another speaker gets run out of a college campus
Trump said things that hurt your feelings
Leftists shut down major cities in the wake of Trump election victory
Trump said things that hurt your feelings
Leftists accuse their opponents of being Nazis for small things

This is what's wrong, you people think that having the wrong opinion warrants violence on your part, and it's justified. It's childish.

I wish all of these are true. My country is basically try to copy American. If a major power succeed, it will be copied. Cant wait to kick those illegals and chinks out.