Johnny Depp is a rich successful movie star. Why would he commit a crime...

>Johnny Depp is a rich successful movie star. Why would he commit a crime? There are literally ZERO examples in history of rich, successful people committing crimes.

>If he had abused her before she would have reported it. No domestic abuse victim would EVER have mixed feelings about pressing charges against their partner

>Her story makes no sense. A rational person wouldn't act that way in a domestic violence situation. People ALWAYS act in a rational manner when their partner assaults them.

>Amber Heard smiled not long after the alleged assault. A domestic abuse victim would NEVER smile with the first month of the assault.

>Johnny Depp has done nice things before, so he can't have committed domestic violence. Abusive husbands act like monsters ALL the time. You can spot them easily.

>Johnny Depp didn't assault his first wife. He therefore can't be guilty because people NEVER change as they get older

>I can tell she is lying from the bruises. I can DEFINITELY do this despite having zero medical knowledge.

Which is your favourite domestic violence apologist meme?

>Which is your favourite domestic violence apologist meme?
I like the one where it's obviously make-up

don't bother. the neckbeards on this site will always bitch about famous women doing conspiracy-tier shit to famous men even though they'd all give their left testicle to have that same woman do the same thing to them.

>Depp is a rich successful movie star. Why would he commit a crime? There are literally ZERO examples in history of rich, successful people committing crimes.
>>If he had abused her before she would have reported it. No domestic abuse victim would EVER have mixed feelings about pressing charges against their partner


he's wearing a greeen hat this is bullshit don't beleive a wor dof it

I think the two concotted the whole thing

Your bait is too weak, traveller.

If you had paid attention instead of being a contrarian faggot you'd see that most people don't doubt they they got into a fight. Saying she was "beaten" is an over exaggeration. He threw a phone at her after she said she was going to leave him and take half his assets two fucking days after his mother died. He did something wrong but she's a soulless, manipulative, borderline sociopathic, gold digging cunt. 99% of men and women would have done much worse than throw some shit around after what she did to him.

>He only threw at a phone at her. Thats not so bad
>I am capable of casting judgements on people I don't know, based on spurious media caricatures

Fucking hell. Step away from your trap porn, take off your fedora and go have sex.

*tips fedora

Did I say it wasn't bad? I literally said what he did was wrong. You need to work on your reading comprehension if you're gonna keep trying to simplify what everyone is saying.

Woah you got me. Good one. Could you elaborate more you meme spazzing sperg?

Sup Forums a few months ago:
>hurr johnny depp is such a cuck for making that trump video fuk him nod even funny
Sup Forums now:
>durr amber heard is lying johnny din du nuffin he was goin to synagogue everyday

Sup Forums hates women more than anybody else

It's interesting to see feminists defending him because he's a sex symbol dream guy to them. Really reveals a lot about their own morals and integrity

>It's Baby Sitter...and the BEAST!

Reminder that women all over the world flocked out to see this piece of shit, which LITERALLY glorifies sadism because the guy is le cool, rich, goodlooking.
Reminder that women's morals and integrity are inconsistent, as is their logic.
Reminder that Johnny Depp hasn't made a good movie in years.

how are the two contradictory?

Me a few months ago:
>wow I wish people would shut the fuck up about Donald fuckin Trump, this board is meant to be about movies

Me now:
>wow I wish people would shut the fuck up about Johnny fuckin Depp, this board is meant to be about movies

Nothing ever changes, it's all just the same shit with a different stink.

amber heard has done literally every single thing that everyone has insisted an abused woman should do –

she has photographic evidence

she has video evidence

she has two witnesses to the assault, one who tried to separate them and another who heard it begin and was begged to call 911

she has multiple witnesses in depp’s security team

she called the police

she filed for a restraining order, which was granted to her, meaning that a united states judge found her evidence convincing enough to believe that she was in danger

she filed for divorce

and news reports are still acting as though there is no way that amber heard could be telling the truth

Remember when Johnny Depp caused Anthony Fox's death and no one bothered to look into it?

That's what be gets for insulting Trump.

>when were you john's career dies?

>I was sat at home posting on Cambodian dog-grooming board when Vaclav ring

>John's career is kill

>no

>photographic evidence

That has been refuted.

>video evidence

that no one has seen

>two witnesses

that have not come forth

>called the police

which said no abuse was apparent

>restraining order

not hard to get at all

>file for divorce

true, but not really relevant.

Johnny Depp has had a lifetime career, many friends and partners, and worked with some of the best professionals in his field. His reputation will be fine, and even if its hurt his success is sure to continue.

Even if he did what he did, 1. It is between them, their lawyers and the L.A. Police, not fans and the media, and 2. the pictures of Heard's "bruises" being leaked tells me this is a ploy to generate controversy to cash out on an easy million.

Nah I know a lot of feminists hated that movie.

this is why we need /cel/

tabllid gossip shit goes in /cel/!

I haven't seen many feminists defend him.

>We have to believe her because she's a woman and she said it happened. Women literally never lie about anything serious. Or they don't do it very often. Or they do but do it for a good reason...or one they thought was good at the time...

>She's entitled to hundreds of millions of dollars because she needs it to maintain her lifestyle. It's only fair.

>She's entitled to it even if he didn't hit her. If she was desperate enough to lie to police then it's obviously because he put her in a bad place emotionally so it's still his fault.

>You need a DOCTOR to say whether or not someone has been hurt badly just from close-up photos. The laymen has no experience with people who've suffered varying degrees of physically assault.

>Men never get fucked over by divorce/family court. It's geared toward helping women more but that's only because men are so evil.

Get off Sup Forums mr publicist, Depp needs you elsewhere .

Isn't she asking for 50k, not his gorillions.

>that hair

Aziz better spruce for a rug soon

He may not have been in a lot of critically acclaimed movies but his performances are always great. Also are you forgetting about Black Mass?

well said OP

>gets BTFO, has his bullshit claimed refuted

Y-youre just a sh-shill

Could you fold any harder faggot?

How is it even supposed to be possible to be with someone the rest of your life without hitting them at least once. Marriages should come with 2 freebies to hit your partner without repercussions.

>Rich guy with too much money gets fucked over

Feels good.

>she filed for a restraining order, which was granted to her, meaning that a united states judge found her evidence convincing enough to believe that she was in danger
Restraining orders are not based upon evidence or proof.

>>A 2008 study found that 72% of civil restraining orders were frivolous, based on exaggerated claims, or were otherwise unneeded.[5] In a 1993 newsletter, Elaine Epstein, then-president of the Massachusetts Bar Association, has remarked, “Everyone knows that restraining orders and orders to vacate are granted to virtually all who apply…In many cases, allegations of abuse are now used for tactical advantage [in divorce and child custody],” and a 1995 study of Massachusetts restraining orders found that under 50% are justified by even allegations of physical violence with some restraining orders being granted on the basis of vague, undefined fears.[6] In contrast, a study from the San Francisco area found that in 63% of cases where restraining orders are issued, the allegations are corroborated at least in part.[7]

Judges have some incentives to err on the side of granting restraining orders. If a judge should grant a restraining order against someone who might not warrant it, typically the only repercussion is that the defendant might appeal the order. If, on the other hand, the judge denies a restraining order and the plaintiff is killed or injured, sour publicity and an enraged community reaction may harm the jurist's career.

...

A friend of mine had his life ruined when his girlfriend posted fake pictures of her bruised up. By fake I mean she literally put makeup on and lied by saying he beat her up. She admitted to it a while after but the damage is done.

I say this because sometimes, someone's skepticism is founded in deeply personal/real experiences and not just LOL SEXISM.

Here's an even simpler rationale for you OP

>>If it looks like bullshit and smells like bullshit, it's probably bullshit

Intentional typo is apparent.

Inno until proven guilty

I pray to joe pesci that none of you end up at a jury of your peers

makes zero sense