Ghost vomits slime all over you

>ghost vomits slime all over you
>it gets in all your cracks and holes

Why do you hate this when it's exactly the same as the scene where Venkman got slimed?

Let me guess, because she's a woman.

venkman didnt make a joke about slime getting in his asshole becahse he isnt skank trash.

I hate her because fat SJW face and problem glasses.

I hate the movie because it looks shitty.

>because she's a woman
Exactly right. Fuck wymen.

Because the joke was already done 32 years ago, and done better.

Her holes must have been extremely loose to begin with for any slime to get in.

The resemblance.
Every time is see her face I think miss Piggy.

>explain the joke
its not a ghostbusters film its a caricature of a ghostbustesr film

I want to fuck miss piggy, can't say the same for McCarthy

I love how the majority find this debauchery not only tasteless but not funny as well.
Just shows sjws are outnumbered and pol is always right and winning

>It's exactly the same as the scene where Venkman got slimed
Exactly

This, the trailers feel like a Ghostbusters sketch

Original scene was original.

New scene is a shitty unfunny copy.

It's not hard to see the difference.

>McCarthy brushed off the criticism in an interview with The Guardian.

>"All those comments — 'You’re ruining my childhood!' I mean, really," she said.

>The umbrage taken has been even more pronounced than for the average reboot, and many believe it's because Ghostbusters marks the first major film to get a female-centric redo (plans for others are in the works, from Ocean's Eleven to The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen).

>Continued McCarthy: "Four women doing any movie on earth will destroy your childhood? I have a visual of those people not having a Ben," she said, referring to her husband and frequent collaborator, Ben Falcone, "not having friends, so they're just sitting there and spewing hate into this fake world of the internet. I just hope they find a friend."

SHOTS FIRED

then fuck back off there you revolting waste of dna

>the league of extraordinary gentlemen
That doesn't make any fucking sense MEN is literally in the name

>movie is shit
>make an even shittier cash-in remake
>profit?
Watch them blame it on the patriarchy

Make new shit with female cast and no-one would complain.
Remaking successful shit with women is fucking retarded.
It shows this is idealogically driven points scoring. Taking away something men had. It's childish and pathetic and it's going to go all wrong very soon for them.

>why did our movie flop

Nevermind that, how many victorian protagonists that can stand on their own can you name that were women?

It's because it's lazy

There wasn't any buildup, nor did it have Murray's deadpan "He slimed me." to sell the joke.

The crack thing was just another joke about vaginas, which is all most popular female comedians seem capable of.

Many Vic novels have important female characters:
Wuthering Heights
Vanity Fair
Little Dorrit
Jane Eyre
Far from the Madding Crowd

I'm sure google would remind me of some others that I can't recall right now.

She insulted me because I disliked this version and said I should get a life and get some friends.

Fuck you, fat bitch

im fucking sick of seeing these threads.

if you nerds actually stepped outside, you'd realise that not a single non-autistic person gives a single fuck about any of this.

fuck off.

Surely this will help the movie more.

I wouldn't hate a gender swapped Ocean's Eleven to be honest.

>stepped outside

>movie about Becky Sharp saving the world, being better than anyone, making fool out of the other league members, but ending up poor and forgotten by everyone

I would watch that.

actually yep, that's pretty much it

>implying hating women is bad or misguided in any way

It's childish and pathetic that you think they have some nefarious plan to take something away from you, or that anything is being taken away at all. The motivation behind this movie is to make money, there's no evil scheme to rape your childhood. There's been tons of these like robocop and poltergeist. They were all shit, but for some reason the one with women in it is the only one you people get so mad about. The movie will be shit, but idiots will see it because of nostalgia. The studio makes their money, and then the remake gets quickly forgotten just like so many times before. Ghostbusters 3 was dead for good the second Ramis died, so we're not missing out on that either.

We got as mad about the other ones as this one. Look it up in the archive.

PG13 Robocop got a lot of hate before it came out. A LOT. Poltergeist got some hate but was so average and dull that people just plain forgot it existed.

There was hate, but not nearly as much. There wasn't 10+ threads a day picking apart every trailer for things to make fun of.

I hope you get a friend, buddy!

There was. You're just trying to defend your shitty estrogen reboot.

>robocop and poltergeist
The difference is, no one was really asking for another of these films. The talk for another Ghostbusters movie has been decades long. Everyone knows about the script for Ghostbusters 3.

Unlike movies like Robocop and Poltergeist, Ghostbusters relies heavily on the players, much more so than the premise. Personally I would have no interest in a Ghostbusters film without the original cast. That they decided to reboot the series and cram some political agenda down our throats with an all female cast, makes this trainwreck worthy of the vitriol it has attracted.

>The motivation behind this movie is to make money, there's no evil scheme to rape your childhood.

Actually, you're wrong.

In this case we actually have the Sony emails from the leak that explain that the decision explicitly IS NOT motivated by making money.

It's political.

Amy Pascal was into this gender swapping, muh female led movies, muh diversity bent not because it makes economic sense, but because she - personally - wanted it.

Since she greenlit a number of projects based on their willingness to bend to her idiotic whims - and trust me, read the fucking leaked emails, this is a moron of a caliber that's hard to fathom - we got things like Fantastic Flop.

Part of the leaks also get into the original premise Feig had and why, it shows him as a pandering asshole with zero respect for the original movies and that all he wanted was to have a female led movie that led into a franchise.

Again, if this was "just economics" they would have tweaked this long ago based on the market performance of their pandering piece of shit movies. The free market isn't embracing this, that leaves political agenda as the sole cause of them still being made.

The movie is going to be awful. Muh evil feminists isn't the reason though, and getting riled up as fuck over that is ridiculous. This movie was going to happen no matter what the cast was, and it would have been just as shit with a male cast.

...

you're either a moron or a terrible troll

>no one likes our movie
>what do i do
>what fucking losers go get a friend

Oh shit, i want to see Ms. Hyde rape the Invisible Woman to death.
FUND IT!

Dan Aykroyd says it's better than the originals.

Oh wow I didn't know the women In Wuthering Heights could turn invisible or turn into a hulk

It's a sound strategy init

>Muh evil feminists isn't the reason though
Strawman. And my point wasn't that its politics made it an awful film, but that it made it a worthy target of scorn.
>and getting riled up as fuck over that is ridiculous.
No more ridiculous than the two of us discussing it right here. Unless if being riled up means actual bouts of rage that are actually affecting someone's well being. Yeah no, it's just people dicking on the internet.
>and it would have been just as shit with a male cast.
Not if that male cast was the original cast. Mind you, it might have still sucked, but it wouldn't have been "just as shit."

>dan aykroyd got a check to say nice things about a movie

>Why do you hate this when it's exactly the same as the scene where Venkman got slimed?
No, because it's already done, and twice in the old movies.

>Amy Pascal
>google her
Looks kinda jewy
>She is Jewish

Sup Forums is right, yet again.

>it's a feminists who only talk to other feminists in feminist echo chambers are surprised by the real world episode

Dan Aykroyd also believes in flying saucers and reptilians.

>because I disliked this version

That's a pretty toned down way to describe the white hot vitriol this movie is getting.

>see trailer for new Adam Sandler movie
>Me: "looks like shit, as usual, not gonna see it"
>*crickets*
>Me: "High five, Benjamin!"

>see trailer for new Melissa McCarthy movie
>Me: "looks like shit, as usual, not gonna see it"
>REEEEEE MISOGYNY WOMAN HATER LOSER WITH NO FRIENDS FUCK YOU!!
>Me: "What the hell?"

I feel like the over-reaction to this movie is making me need to re-evaluate Sandler. He never treats his haters like this. In fact, he seems like a nice guy most of the time I see him. And he keeps his SNL-friends and Pacino employed. You know what, I'm gonna go see Jack & Jill. It can't be as bad as this all-female Ghostbusters.

>for some reason the one with women in it is the only one you people get so mad about

First, you're a confirmed newfag as there were Robocop threads constantly. Second, the reason everyone is so "mad" and you're seeing nonstop threads is because every attempt at criticism is met with replies like yours. We're making the same complaints we made then, but now because the cast is a bunch of women, it's childish and pathetic and misogynistic.

This makes the whole thing personal and armchair critics aren't going to respond to personal attacks well. I'm not saying there aren't real sexists out there that hate the film specifically because it stars women, but both sides are yucking this "gender war" shit up for publicity. The whole thing's a shitshow and you're a pawn in Sony's self-marketing machine.

>Muh evil feminists isn't the reason though

This movie was made because of talentless, shrieking feminist cultists like Amy Pascal, and then Paul Feig.

So no, Feminists ARE at fault here. Nice try.

Nice try, Sandman.

>It's childish and pathetic that you think they have some nefarious plan to take something away from you, or that anything is being taken away at all.

Leftists LITERALLY celebrate shit like this or Rolland the Gunslinger being made black as JUST THAT.

>Leftists LITERALLY celebrate shit like this or Rolland the Gunslinger being made black as JUST THAT.
Because they're delusional and think every decision a company makes is done specifically to either make them happy or scorn them.

>genderswapped movies are now a thing
Why?? This is so fucking stupid. You're remaking a movie but with women instead. That's the stupidest most sjw reason to make a movie.

Yep context matters. They sell the joke in the original because of the way event fall out.
They're trying to sell nostalgia by cribbing someone else's material here and its not working.

I was foolish to think I was gonna be able to trick the smartest people on the Internet. For real though, go watch The Do-Over. It's real good.

The comparison with Sandler is one I made recently. If this Ghostbusters reboot starred Rob Schneider and Adam Sandler the SJW lynchmob would have us believe it would be doing great and get all the praise the Ghostbusters reboot isn't getting.

I think anyone with their head on knows that's fucking unlikely.

Conversely, as you say, nobody bats an eye if you call out Sandler on making utter shit movies. Or calling out Michael Bay for being a nonsense cacophony creator who has nothing but contempt for his own audience.

The controversy and the response only exists because of the PC climate. In any other era this would just be another misguided reboot attempt soon forgotten.

Robocop remake, Poltergeist remake, Total Recall remake.. all ill advised flops. No big political circus to prop them up. But say the same things about this movie and you get every media outlet writing political articles about how you're a bad person for not liking it. Coordinated articles even, as with James who dared say "I'm not going to see it".

>Misojynist manbaby reeeeeee.

These are dark times.

Even though their idiotic political movies keep flopping, they keep getting made. We haven't seen the end of "Black Annie" style swaps, or "Ghostbusters" style swaps. Because the decisions aren't based on what the audiences want, it's dictated on what they SHOULD want.
Very progressive.

>The motivation behind this movie is to make money, there's no evil scheme to rape your childhood.

The leaked Sony e-mails OUTRIGHT show that Amy Pascal greenlit this movie because it was an opportunity to force more women into iconic franchises, which she feels is a justified and righteous motive.

There was literally a political agenda behind this movie's creation from day fucking 1.

Like most idiots defending this movie and screaming "MUHSORGNY", you're factually fucking wrong about everything you say.

Don't you have to go trim your nu-male beard? I'm sure there's plenty of Pabst Blue Ribbon and granola stuck in it at this point.

I like Paul Feig though.

>mfw kc green got mega butthurt over this edit

Dan Aykroyd lost all credibility years ago and could very well be mentally ill. That is hardly a sound endorsement.

i want to play with her big fat hanging belly while fucking her doggystyle

Am I the only one who actually hates the new ghostbusters because it's all female? In my experience, all female comedies aren't funny at all, and from the trailer this doesn't look any better.

bridesmaids happened shitlord

I don't know why people are so hard on her, she was really good in Return of the Jedi

Really hated that.

meninist pissbaby detected

You're probably right. I have a big problem with women in general.

He could just be a Jew.

Post yfw the porn parody gets better reviews and makes a better profit margin.

Ditto

If you want a female-centric franchise then go and make your own!

> female-centric redo
> leage of extraordinary gentleMEN

Venkman didn't make a Bridesmaids-tier joke.

I never would have thought I'd call the first Ghostbusters "classy", but there's classy and then there's trashy.

But why make their own shit when men already have made it for them?

It's literally a craven, cynical, transparent cash grab, hoping they could turn progressive SJW ideology into profit.

It's the same with any gender swap, race swap, sexuality swap.

>OMG GIVE ELSA IN FROZEN A GF!

Make your own fucking original characters that stand on their own.

Muh feels. Pleb.

Yes, the movie exists to make money. It's a craven cash grab, banking on good will from 3 decades ago. The only reason for anyone to see it is nostalgia. The makers are lazy people just wanting to freeload off existing properties.

And yes, the Robocop reboot was shit, the Total Recall reboot was shit, and I'm sure the Point Break reboot is also pure shit. Same goes for Halloween, Nightmare on Elm Street, Carrie, you name it.

This movie will also be shit, but the cynical producers are hoping people will overlook the fact that most reboots are shit because GIRL POWER. The producers are literally using female actors as human shields.

And just like Jews like to wave off any criticism of Israel as anti-Semitism, SJWs like to wave off any criticism of their retardedness with claims of sexism and misogny (or attacking critics as lonely virgins who will totally never be Prom King!)

Jean Baudrillard:
>The cinema in its current efforts is getting closer and closer, and with greater and greater perfection, to the absolute real, in its banality, its veracity, in its naked obviousness, in its boredom, and at the same time in its presumption, in its pretension to being the real, the immediate, the unsignified, which is the craziest of undertakings..

>Cinema plagiarizes itself, recopies itself, remakes its classics, retroactivates its original myths, remakes the silent film more perfectly than the original, etc.

>Today cinema can place all its talent, all its technology in the service of reanimating what it itself contributed to liquidating. It only resurrects ghosts, and it itself is lost therein.

Sup Forums got REKT

>when it's exactly the same as the scene where Venkman got slimed?
This is why I hate it, come up with something new rather than rehashing the old jokes.

>makes shitty movie
>receives criticism
>pretends to be a victim
>insults others when she doesn't get pity

Women.

Dan Aykroyd also said Ghostbusters 3 will soon begin production every year for the past decade.

The remake is obsolute shit. The original was absolute shit.

Yea, that could be fun.

>> it's exactly the same
>> it's exactly the same

stop hollywood graverobbing.
time for them to earn a buck by doing something original.

i would hate another oceans anything

But how can females ever be successful in Hollywood without copying successful men????

>I can't find a valid rebuttal to people rightfully calling my movie a piece of shit
>I'll just make up my own version of what they said and who they are so I can win my make believe argument

also
>dat pic
she should be more concerned about what her scale is saying

>let me guess, because she's a woman
The movie sucks ass, get your shitty SJW all male hate women ass out of here.

>when it's exactly the same as the scene where Venkman got slimed?

Do you not understand that this is exactly why everyone hates the trailers?

>Women's ocean eleven
>Watch them all catch a bunch rich guys in a club
>Marry them
>Divorce them almost immediately
>Next scene is them all clanging their glasses together in a mansion
>The End

Does james typically make podcast's going at length at which movies he wont be seeing before watching them?

That face is why oppressive beauty standards exist

>exactly the same
there's your answer.