Can Johnny be saved?

Can Johnny be saved?

Other urls found in this thread:

dougstanhope.com/journal/2016/5/29/words-fail-me
cnn.com/2016/05/30/us/gorilla-shot-cincinnati-witnesses/index.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

hopefully this nigger dissapear from cinema completely

He's gonna get fucked depp in the ass.

I fucking hope not, he's got 3 people he can play.
>himself
>wonkier version of himself for Tim Burton
>Keith Richards

Nothing worth saving imo

>make sequel 6 years later to a movie that only made money because it was in the middle of the 3D trend

for real,though, what's the train of thought that gets these movies made?
The first one had a lukewarm reception AT BEST, and I don't really think it made a lot of money

can someone enlighten me

1. his mother dies
2. she is filling out divorce papers
3. she suddenly has bruices and claims abuse
is this correct?

Pretty sure it broke a billion senpai

>over a billion dollars isn't a lot of money

It did better than BvS.

>tfw Johnny will be cucked so hard he will kill himself

It made a fucking ridiculous amount of money.

dougstanhope.com/journal/2016/5/29/words-fail-me

...

based doug

Pretty much this. They thought it would make a shitload of money again, but they didn't realize barely anyone liked the first one.

JUST

more like johnny debt

...

How many bombs has he got in recent years

>mortdecai
>Lone Ranger
>now this

Sup Forums supports Depp against the golddigging bitch but Sup Forums won't support Depp's film :(

...

true

Who wants to watch this trash except teenage girls

Sick of edgy burton style "reimaginings" of fairy tales

The torch has been passed.

You don't seem to be aware of how much money it made. That's the source of your confusion. Your thinking "man this didn't get good reviews what's up with them making more of it?!" without taking into considering how much money it made. Did you assume it didn't make that much money or did you misremember? In either case, it was a mistake on your part.

Why was the movie bad?

You forgot Hunter S. Thompson.

the film has nothing to do with box office returns you fucking numbskulls

it is purely a ritualistic celebration of illuminati values and goals, i mean it's more complicated than that but that's the gist of it

Did people really want a sequel? The first one sucked.

I know, i want him fucking dead.

>in the year of our feminist overlords 2016
>thinking a pretty girl is capable of lying

I'm not even mad.
Johnny Depp's a cunt.

Because Tim Burton's Dark Shadows wasn't shit enough.

>dat belt buckle position
He truly is /fa/ as fuck

Hollywood is good at noticing what makes money, but not so good at noticing why.

do you think johnny watches mommy joi porn?

>Alice Through the Looking Glass
>Production Budget: $170 million

How? Is CGI really that expensive?

Dark Shadows

no but cocaine is and they need a lot of it to grease the wheels getting these big productions made

Depp gets paid at least $75 mil a picture

Wait. The first one made literally a billion dollars. What the fuck went wrong? Was the first just a fluke?

it was the second big 3d film after avatar. novelty wore off

You're the kind of faggot who would rather let a gorilla kill a child than kill the gorilla.

People are boycotting this new one because it was revealed Depp abused his wife in the past like a day before it came out in theaters. Therefore, people obviously have to boycott it because of him, even though he already got his paycheck for doing the movie.

It probably costs close to 200 million with marketing expenses.

Depp gets back end as well.

The first one was out when muh 3D was still something cool to the masses.

>tfw it's revealed she's lying and Disney sues her penniless

nigga what?

I saw the first expecting some kind of dark interesting Burton-style take on the classic Alice story. Instead I got complete shit and there's no way they could pay me to go see a sequel now.

>it was revealed Depp abused his wife
PROOFS

/thread

Studio's fault, tbqh.

Why the fuck did they greenlight a sequel to a movie that was at best, mediocre? Who wanted it? Who asked for it.

No one gives a rat's ass about Alice in Wonderland. No. One.

first one was SHIT. also horrid 3d that bum fucked the source material and fans. Burton fan girls went to see it solely because of Burton and Depp. this was also 6 years ago.

cnn.com/2016/05/30/us/gorilla-shot-cincinnati-witnesses/index.html

see:

The first movie was total shit. They'll blame this on Depp's personal issues and not the fact that this was an unnecessary sequel.

>cnn.com/2016/05/30/us/gorilla-shot-cincinnati-witnesses/index.html

still don't see the connection though

mommy joi porn is delightful and everybody knows that a strong oedipal complex is the sign of an alpha male

Lone Ranger wasn't his fault. Disney ignored the fact that Westerns had never made the amount of money that could justify a blockbuster budget. It could have starred Clint Eastwood and it still would have flopped.

Still, it's six fucking years later and all the teenage girls who might've liked this have grown up now.

This had "BOMB" written all over the place and it's wierd that a handful of nerds in a Burmese dynamite-fishing forum can see it, but not a big studio.

Yeah but I like the lone ranger and if they didn't make the movie so terrible i would have gone to see it

Somebody needs to tweet about this with the #blacklivesmatter hashtag.

>Alice Through the Looking Glass

Just watch the Kate Beckinsale version. That book was batshit crazy anyway the story doesn't make any sense.

Transcendence bombed too

Disney was counting with Jack Sparrow's success. They brought the same thing and gave Depp a new hat. Also, it was Depp the one who pushed the project. From Disney's perspective, it was Depp's fault.

Nah, Amber is based.