3 > 6 > 8 > 1 > 2 > 7 > 5 > 4

3 > 6 > 8 > 1 > 2 > 7 > 5 > 4

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=MrZB9nPMvS4
youtube.com/watch?v=4vC4BTNlpOc
youtube.com/watch?v=2aQEcHwRCmo
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

7>8>4>3>6>5>1>2

5 and 6 mesh together for me

Naw, 5 was hot garbage.

6 is kino.

ARRY
R
R
Y

Should I give these films a watch? I never have. The cool kids seem to like them.

Yeah man. For the most part, they're pretty comfy.

they're all mediocre as fuck, badly paced, shit at a climax, and half of the time you've no idea what the fucking point of the scene is, and none of the kids can act

They aren't badly paced and the kids are good except harry fuck your shit

Climaxes were all great save colombus' and you only don't know the point of the scene if you're retarded

Objective truth

Whichever one that had the Dementors is the only one I liked.

6 is kino

Op you rated 1 2 too high and 7 too low

3>7>6>8>2>5>1>4

8 isn't better than 7 and 1 2 aren't either

That would be 3 They were also in 5 and 7/8. Harry uses the patronus in 3 5 7

Pretty good taste mang but I can't put 4 ahead of 3 or 6. 7 is mint

Only if you watch it in really good quality

2>1>3>the rest

shit ass kids films were better than twilight faggotry

>watching past 3

>shit taste
>having shit opinions
Its like pottery

Goblet was the only bad one. Yates idziak, delbonnel and serra did great jobs

>he likes hunger games teenage romance shite.
ebik obinion

That's the correct order OP, I agree.

I only care about 3 and 6.
1 and 2 are nostalgia trains.
I don't even remember what happened in other movies, except for 8, which was great.

>there he goes
>this is his critique
>muh hunger games twilight romance shite
Please mate my sides..have you ever been laid?

5 was one of the best ones. Yr a turbo-pleb

7 is better than 8. Its patricians choicem agreed with 3 and 6. My top three are 3 6 7

Ootp is underrated good taste. I like yates other ones better for the most part tho.

3>7>6>5>2=8>1>4

>i bet ur fun at partees! :)

That's your rebuttal?

>only the first ones were good because im a patrician and patricians love studio directing
>witchcraft shouldnt be dark

PoA is the most-overrated HP movie.

Period.

Chamber of Secrets is the best HP movie.

No, you can't argue otherwise.

>rebuttal

Jesus! they made 8 Harry Potter movies?

I always thought they only made like 4 of them.

Listen I love chamber but Columbus' direction and the adaptation has been torn apart.

3 is still underrated because anons like you say its overrated

Goblet is top tier you pleb

3 is massively-overrated and that grows everytime there's an HP thread.

Yes they made 4 movies off 7 books. Pretty sure the first four books came out in the 90s

Chamber of Secrets is pretty good, but PoA utilizes the characters wonderfully.

You could watch PoA by itself as a stand alone film

No people appreciate it as they should.

I've seen chamber slightly overrated even though I love it I cannot say its the best film.

5 6 7 are usually underrated. 8 is overrated by the general population

6 is best. Draco gets sectum sempwnd

>t. Mike Newell
You're a maniac Newell

>You could watch PoA by itself as a stand alone film

I could watch Chamber just as well.

3 is the only acceptable

3 is so much better than 2 its not even a real discussion. Columbus is admirable but he literally brought nothing to the adaptation

Philosopher's Stone
Flick 9
Movie 8
Film 8
Kino 6

Chamber of Secrets
Flick 9
Movie 9
Film 8
Kino 7

Prisoner of Azkaban
Flick 9
Movie 8
Film 10
Kino 10

Goblet of Fire
Flick 10
Movie 9
Film 7
Kino 7

Order of the Phoenix
Flick 9
Movie 9
Film 9
Kino 9

Half Blood Prince
Flick 10
Movie 10
Film 10
Kino 10

Deathly Hallows Part 1.
Flick 10
Movie 9
Film 10
Kino 10

Deathly Hallows Part 2
Flick 9
Movie 9
Film 9
Kino 9

>3 > 6 > 8 > 1 > 2 > 7 > 5 > 4

so Star Wars?

Did you watch 6? It shit all over the book. No feels at all just bland bullshit for white girls on tumblr

>eh I guess we'll look for the horcruxes, sucks Dumbledore died

Hp 7 makes star wars 7 look like a B movie

>book
>buzzwords
The book sucked its of the few cases of movie being better not because of the script but the directing. The tones meld and its dreary and dreamlike. The atmosphere at hogwarts is great and the corridors swallow the characters in times of stress. I honestly love it more everytime and i originally loved the book. Also goat soundtrack

Are you kidding me you have the balls to say hbp was bad and cite the book i could say the exact same thing about goblet of fire.

>dumbledores lament
>not emotional
I was senpai great climax

If you don't like 3 or 6 you unobjectively have bad taste

No.

3 > 5 > 2 > 1 > 7 > 6 > 4

>2 1 better than 6 7
>5 better than 6 7

>Harry didn't die
Ruined the ending for me

>Death eaters are largely worthless and pose no real threat to anyone
Ruined the last few films for me

>Molly kills Le'strange
Ruined the last film

>Harry blames Dark Lord of Digdugs death
Wormtail killed digdug, Harry is a liar

>No one believes a word Harry says
He's been right every film about everything

>Le'strange could've killed Lupin right after Sirus, but doesn't for no reason
Ruined her character

>Barty Crouch Jr din't get more screentime
One of the best characters

i only watched the first 3 and missed absolutely nothing

>6 or 7 better than 5
Pleb

They are and I like 5 a lot. Yates and atmosphere was even better in 6 and 7.1

>mfw that's actually you because you honestly believe your own nonsense like a troglodyte

>barty crouch jr
Opinion discarded

Also you can't spam killing curses you haveto charge it

Here you go though user

I liked 2 a lot. I was really absorbed in it as a kid.

This.
2 is a true patrician's choice.

Patrician

Its great but not compared to most of the others

This is the only grid I have its not that good

Ebin as fuck

4 IS KINO YOU FUCKS

I've never seen more ecclectic tastes than harry potter threads. People like all of them for their own reasons. Its a testament to how good of a series it is. Patrician series honestly.

Case and point
This guy. Are you the guy who posts. Chinese fireball...ooooooh. you're the best

Post yfw the harry potter marathon skips order of the phoneix for some reason

youtube.com/watch?v=MrZB9nPMvS4
C O M F Y
O
M
F
Y
My so confident of my patrician tastes that I am not afraid that watching pleb movies will somehow degrade me

John Williams was in his prime for harry potter and the star wars prequels

youtube.com/watch?v=4vC4BTNlpOc

Fucking hell williams

Set feels at maximum

youtube.com/watch?v=2aQEcHwRCmo

1=2>4>3>7>8>6>5

Into the trash

4>2>1>5>3>6>7>8

Maybe the worst ITT. Goblet of Fire kek

This, it gotten bored4me after they grew up

Last three were objectively shit, but I put 8 last because the epilogue of middle aged Harry is laughably bad. GoF and CoS had the best plots.

Azkaban was so good I feel like reading the book, is it any good? I'm too lazy to go /lit/, I'm not into book much I'm more of a Kinosseur

They're making 3 more out a one fucking book now

No they weren't 6 and 7.1 are top 3
>he actually watches films for the plots
Jesus christ kid. Goblet ruined the material and is the worst directed along with Columbus.

Kino
3 5 6 7

Kino flicks
1 2 4 8

True kino
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Pleb. I feel bad for you. Bored is such a pleb word.

>it gotten

Can't argue with consecutive dubs.

Book is good the time travel isn't as good as the mechanics in the film, I wont tell you but its slightly different. Foirth book was also good.

>3

People only pretend to like this because it was directed by the guy who made reddits favourite film

I don't hate it its just not as good as the others

This is a pretty low brow opinion to have

3 is so overrated
>muy dark tones
4>7/8>2>6>3>1>5

For the books:
7>6>4>2>3>1>5

For the movies:
7>6>2>3>1>4>8>5

God, they really fucked up the film versions of 5 and the second half of 7.

My gripes with 5:
>longest book, one of the shortest movies in the series
>no Quiddich
>completely skipped over Harry and Cho's awkward relationship
>Dumbledore breezes over the prophecy with Harry, and Harry accepts it right away (I actually kinda appreciated angsty teen Harry from that book)

Gripes with Deathly Hallows 2:
>all that extra film time created by splitting the last book into two movies, and they STILL breeze over the Kings Cross scene
>and on that note, barely any mention of Dumbledore and Grindelwald's relationship, Dumbledore's sister, or his interest in the Hallows
>Harry snaps the Elder Wand without using it to fix his old one first
>oh BTW Harry can fly with Voldermort, no big deal

I do like a lot of parts of Hallows 2, but there are too many dumb variations and omissions to be overlooked. The way they portrayed them on the run in the first part was very good; that's why I have that one as #1.

3>4>2>1>7>5>6

this is not even a discussion

4 way too high. No way is it better than 3. 6 too low

Pretty good bro but I say 3 better than 2

4 too high 6 too low and 7.1 too low. Nobody considers 7.1 and 7.2 a single film they are so different

>2
>Not the best

There's no quidditch because they had it in four straight movies . Yes no world cup in goblet but the first task takes it place. DH1 is very good

>being this contrarian
I like it but you realize a majority of people specifically critics consider it the worst and have written at length about why

...

ayy

Delete this

>implying any HP movie can be watched in good quality
color shit gold, it's still shit

>tfw you have a long shitty day and just random a HP movie and they are all so comfy.

>this assmad
Ill be enjoying the films in goat quality on my big tv. They look great.

Who here hyped for more of these?