/brit/

heem edition

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=mCB6RvRojIQ
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

connor mcgregor sucks willies

egg

youtube.com/watch?v=mCB6RvRojIQ

>weird how math[sic], engineering, and economics (things that actually take a brain to do) are all right leaning

...

just saw a woodpecker - nice

day of the rope soon

"left" and "right" in the US (and Canada) means jack shit, most mainstream lefties are braindeads here who campaign for absolute rubbish and think a revolution is right around the corner or literally my mum who says we should just be nice to everyone.

right wing for the most part are either fundamentalist Christians or old boy Tory gigacapitalists

The new quid coin is ugly as fuck. What a fucking TRAVESTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

didn't the IRA have quite a lot of support?

What is the point of this meme, Catholics should be banned

for their supposed 'superior' intelligence, lefties don't seem to do much with it besides create more statistics about how smart and right about everything they are.

loud minority but a silent majority of catholics in northern Ireland also approved in some way

> day of the rope soon

same could be said for these people

so this is the power of the internet

cracking post

what

>once accidentally asked my Protestant NornIron grandfather if he or his father were ever in the IRA

he wasn't very happy

if you retards knew how to operate a search engine you could easily find that economists tend to be conservative
reminder that the last democrat in office spent more than all other presidents combined. have a think about that. then have a think about how our economy has changed since 2008

/brit/ has been quite Costcutters all morning

they're always wanking on about how much more superior they are on account of them being white but the jewish subhumans are keeping them down

what are they doing that is so awful?
the left is just racist

those people don't look white to me

6 million people isn't a small group

>if you retards knew how to operate a search engine you could easily find that economists tend to be conservative

economists tend to be pro-free market, pro-deregulation, pro-free trade, pro-low taxes, which is a liberal stance

notice how not one credible economist agrees with drumpf's chief economic advisor

love early morning political discussion. let's throw in communism vs capitalism now shall we?

how do you know that?
desu most historical Fascists have been wogs or orientals

>which is a liberal stance
not in America

Is china communist or capitalist? I can never remember

ah yes, another thread of political arguments, very good

liberalism is a mental disease

Can't believe the World Cop is only about 15 months away

>pro-free market, pro-deregulation, pro-free trade, pro-low taxes, which is a liberal stance
genuinely cannot tell if you are baiting

How can lefties believe in moral relativism, but at the same time believe in intellectual absolutism?

...

Clue is in the name - liberal, as in 'liberty'

agreed

those are literally all rightist policies anywhere in the world

i huutrt mysalf toady
to see fi can stil feel

>intellectual absolutism

what does that mean

the line between what is right and wrong can depend on the situation

whether 2+2=4 is always correct

Nonce of these thing actually exist

just assumed you meant liberal as in america where it means leftist because I didn't think you would be so retarded to switch to arguing liberal vs authoritarian with has nothing to do with left vs right

The concepts of right and wrong are as real as the concepts of numbers

3/10 on the Sup Forums bernd

Meh a good proportion of 'conomists are radical centrists.

Most econ papers conclude with potential interventions to address what theyre discussing

>the line between what is right and wrong can depend on the situation
no it doesn't

it depends on the person making the ruling, the situation is irrelevant since every situation can be both a good and a bad one.

in reality there are no "good" or "bad" actions, just action and non-action.

All I ask for is an "eat-what-you-kill" economy. If you create a lot of value for society, you get a lot of nice things. If you just try to shuffle zero-sum wealth towards yourself, but create no value, you get nothing. If you don't do anything and create no value, you get nothing from the state but can depend on private charities.

"left" and "right" has become meaningless ever since the death of communism

today it is about liberalism (freedom) versus conservatism (totalitarianism)

US politics names are basically newspeak.

Liberal is like the opposite of communist, but yet you call Bernie Sanders a liberal.

the Labour Theory of Value is irrefutable

I didn't say they weren't.

In some cases what is usually considered immoral can be moral. Stealing from a billionaire to feed a hungry child vs a billionaire stealing from a hungry child is one of those cases.

define value

Work in 15 minutes but I'm fucking exhausted. Still in bed. Not a fan of this wageslave meme.

>communism is dead

>Liberal is like the opposite of communist

why are you even replying then if you think it is meaningless? I was obviously arguing left vs right and didn't even mention liberalism. conservative means right here

>why can't people take the right seriously
>have they not seen my graphs proving black people are subhuman

>liberal as in america where it means leftist
don't know why you fat stupid mongs do this

That's not what moral relativism means

*promotes miscegenation*
think again kiddo

define it then
define intellectual absolutism while you're at it

How much you make everyone else's lives better. And quality of life is in turn defined by happiness, meaningfullness, health, and the amount of choice and autonomy people have.

if you mean liberal (uk) here you say libertarian

because your assertion that economics is right wing was wrong

anyway i'm off to work bye

Ohoohoooo no such thing as good and bad, aren't we lucky

the political zeitgests in the early 1900s and now are nearly identical

communism never died, and fascism was just laying low

>dude right and left is meaningless
>but economics isn't right
you're fucking braindead

two monks were watching a flag in the wind and contemplating its nature

the first monk said that it is the flag which moves
the second claimed that it was in fact the wind which moves

the Master, overhearing this debate, stated that neither monk was correct
It is the mind which moves

...

Why do working class southerners vote tory

t. statistically probably a young earth creationist

>tfw no big soft bum pushing into my groin as i fall asleep

>communism never died
it was stillborn
socialism is alive, but socialism is older than communism and much less retarded.

he really isn't, I think you need to read more

the master is retarded

t. drumpf can never win because the polls say so

good goy

Felt this sensation

P good

Why does he only sweat on his face

>pro-free market, pro-deregulation, pro-free trade, pro-low taxes,

these are right wing stances everywhere in the world
leftists want more market controls, more regulations, more trade protectionism (although this can go both ways), and higher taxes

Moral relativism believes that moral systems exist within designated jurisdictions, but don't sleep beyond those borders. So the "West" ,iChat have its own morals around abortion, but that doesn't affect morality in other regions, like the Middle East, where abortion might be wrong,

And in this sense, nothing can be said to be objectively wrong. Nothing is wrong across the universe as a whole, only within certain regions,

This occurs because relativists believe that humans creat morality as a social construct meant to control societal norms of behaviour, to organize people. Very different from moral universalists who believe in absolute Rights and Wrongs.

Really made me think

prove it
prove that either a flag or wind moves without thinking about it

centred around yank politics and their terminology

he meant liberal as in libertarian, not as in left like we say here. thus it was completely irrelevent to the conversation

why should we care about morals then at all in this case?
why not pursue pure personal utility

state capitalism

fat stupid mong

>Moral Relativism (or Ethical Relativism) is the position that moral or ethical propositions do not reflect objective and/or universal moral truths

Intellectual absolutism means exactly what it says. Intellectual ideas can reflect absolute truth.
The problem is that intellectual ideas are dependent upon moral foundations that most leftist do not knowledge.

yeah not going to use bronze age definitions for morality, your argument is as wonky as my ket

t. autismo yank

its not sweat its some type of oil he puts on himself

getting hard to stay on the chon lately
kinda bored of it desu
make me laugh or something

Fucking iPad ruined everything I typed.

Should be seep not sleep.
iChat shouldn't be in there. Should just be may.
And those fucking commas.

God macs are so low IQ

It's Bio Oil.

>Moral relativism believes that moral systems exist within designated jurisdictions, but don't sleep beyond those borders. So the "West" ,iChat have its own morals around abortion, but that doesn't affect morality in other regions, like the Middle East, where abortion might be wrong,

What objection do people have with this line of thinking? In our own society slavery was once considered an intrinsic moral good and the divine right of kings was a given but they no longer are. Were we wrong then but not now or correct then but not now?

As you correctly stated morality is determined by who is judging it.

we say "downy" instead of mong (uk) here