/brit/

fat stupid mong

>Moral Relativism (or Ethical Relativism) is the position that moral or ethical propositions do not reflect objective and/or universal moral truths

Intellectual absolutism means exactly what it says. Intellectual ideas can reflect absolute truth.
The problem is that intellectual ideas are dependent upon moral foundations that most leftist do not knowledge.

yeah not going to use bronze age definitions for morality, your argument is as wonky as my ket

t. autismo yank

its not sweat its some type of oil he puts on himself

getting hard to stay on the chon lately
kinda bored of it desu
make me laugh or something

Fucking iPad ruined everything I typed.

Should be seep not sleep.
iChat shouldn't be in there. Should just be may.
And those fucking commas.

God macs are so low IQ

It's Bio Oil.

>Moral relativism believes that moral systems exist within designated jurisdictions, but don't sleep beyond those borders. So the "West" ,iChat have its own morals around abortion, but that doesn't affect morality in other regions, like the Middle East, where abortion might be wrong,

What objection do people have with this line of thinking? In our own society slavery was once considered an intrinsic moral good and the divine right of kings was a given but they no longer are. Were we wrong then but not now or correct then but not now?

As you correctly stated morality is determined by who is judging it.

we say "downy" instead of mong (uk) here