Pop in 2000

Pop in 2000
>Excuse me I made a mistake
>I am not necessarily the purest girl
>I play with boys emotions


Pop in 2017
>LITERALLY SHOVE 10 DICKS IN MY ASSHOLE RIGHT NOW
>FUCK YEAH I DICK BICYCLE
>*niggers singing in autotune*
>CHOKE ME DADDY

Other urls found in this thread:

wikiwand.com/en/Rules_for_Radicals
ultimateclassicrock.com/sex-songs/
igmchicago.org/surveys/low-skilled-immigrants
cracked.com/article_17625_7-songs-from-your-grandpas-day-that-would-make-eminem-blush.html
youtube.com/watch?v=qWNpZ3Dwf68
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

We've advanced as a society since 2000.

If you like the Beatles, then Louisian-born teen-idol Britney Spears is a milestone in popular music. If you think the Beatles were the biggest rip-off of all times, then... they were the second biggest. The biggest is Britney Spears, a trivial singer and a trivial dancer dancer who has mastered the art of copying the trends, although a product on which the music industry has lavished millions of dollars to create an overnight sensation. And an overnight sensation she became when (barely 18) she debuted with Baby One More Time, a catchy refrain propelled by martial hip-hop beats (courtesy of Max Martin, the same man behind the music of the Backstreet Boys). The album Baby One More Time (Jive, 1999) will sell ten million copies in just one year. The production work was certainly state-of-the-art, but what "sold" was her image of malicious (quasi-nymphomaniac) teenager and her throaty "oh baaaby".
She became the youngest artist ever to top the charts for both singles and albums. Teenagers around the world went nuts, the same way their grandfathers had done when the Beatles first uttered "yeah yeah yeah". The media scrutinized her private life and websites overflew with sexy photos of Britney's tits and Britney's thighs.

Pop in 2000

With you my life
I want to live the life
And what I have left of life
I want to live with you


Pop in 2017

I RIDE DICKS
CUM ON MY FACE
CALL ME A SLUT NOW
I AM A WHORE PLEASE FUCK MY ASSHOLE NOW

Yeah but toxic is still a banger.

madrigals in 1500s
>Lets fuck right now
>Kinda just want to sit around all day orgasming
>SEX SEX SEX SEX SEX

what is this, a youtube comments section? "DAE miss when music wasnt all about le drugs and sex???" fuck off idiot. pop music was just as filthy then as it is right now. it's not like britney was literally the only pop star in the world.

>mozart
>lick me in the arse
Look it up

shut up user we were born in the perfect generation that can not be criticized in any way

Your point crumbles apart when you start seeing obvious trends

Do you think pop was this filthy 40 years ago too? There's obvious trends to get more obscene.

the generation isn't the problem, it's the result

>me: 2017 vs. 2000
>you: BUT WHAT ABOUT 2017 VS 1977
but i wasn't talking about that you retard

Your selective perception is showing.
If you actually took the time to analyze lyrics over the past 50 years, you would find the words might be somewhat different, but the message is the same.
You're just growing older and becoming more aware of things like other people's sexuality and how much it permiates in society, and it makes you uncomfortable.
It's always been there, you just never noticed.

You have to see there's an obvious trend

not him but
>DAE miss when music wasnt all about le drugs and sex???
is obviously not specific to a particular time period

Typical reddit enlightened centrist post. Can you just go back?

>the message "i love you" is exactly equivalent to "i want to fuck you"
>>>/tumblr/

she aint got shit on madonna

this, it's not even worth debating because the people behind it admit it. there's a lot of positive talk about how this generation's media is more "progressive" "sex positive" but as soon as someone takes a negative view of this they suddenly pretend there's been no change at all

this thread is about 2000 vs 2017 so fucking obviously that's what i was referring to.

This is how leftists argue
wikiwand.com/en/Rules_for_Radicals

Hypocrisy amped by 100

At least madrigals hide it with metaphors

whatever dude. you're being intellectually dishonest if you think that's all the thread is about. you can leave now

name 3 (THREE) pop songs released in 2017 that involves any of these

>>LITERALLY SHOVE 10 DICKS IN MY ASSHOLE RIGHT NOW
>>FUCK YEAH I DICK BICYCLE
>>CHOKE ME DADDY

Lel that is so true. They do the same thing with immigration too. They say it's good immigrants are becoming a larger portion of western countries, then when someone complains they'll eventually replace whites, they respond "LOL what are you talking about no they wont". Just admit you think it's a good thing!

every ariana grande song

>released in 2017

autism

I love that song.

autism

autism

uhh.. people support immigration because it's good for the economy in immigrants.. most people arent that obsessed with ethnicity

>all the young girls love alice
>tender young alice they say
>come over and tease me, come over and please me
>alice, it's my turn today

>sweet painted lady, seems its always been the same
>getting paid for being laid

>Mozart
>Lick me in the arse

>shes my cherry pie
>looks so good itd make a grown man cry

i could think of more, but its up to you to get the fuck over yourself

Most recent immigrants are on welfare and are a tax burden.

An ethnicity makes a nation, if you replace the population of a nation it's going to be a different nation.

What's so bad about cherry pie

>be me, enlightened trump supporter who knows (((their))) plot to destroy whiteness
>complain about declining birth rates among whites
>***jews makes music promoting sex***
>"uhhh this generation remember when women didnt show their ankles like sluts my fellow bros?"

Here's some more:
ultimateclassicrock.com/sex-songs/

>importing millions of mostly unskilled laborers most of whom cant speak english (or german, swedish, etc.)
>good for the economy
Maybe that's good for the top 1%, but it takes true mental gymnastics to think it's good for the country as a whole.

90% of young girls that age are on birth control
this isn't promoting having kids

It's obviously lewd, just in a different way

None of the old stuff is as bad as ariana grande which is listened to by 8 year olds who get nail bombed by ISIS at her concert

It's like poetry

This doesn't disprove anything. It only would if anybody had claimed that there were zero sexual songs prior to the 10s.

Fuck off grandpa, video games and television don't turn kids into murderers, and rock music isn't the devil. You knee jerk fuckwads have been overly concerned about inconsequential bullshit for decades, when will you learn?
All crime statistics are down and even rate of sexual intercourse between millenials is down, so just shut the fuck up and relax, and mind your own god damn business

Sex is different than murder
Most humans don't have an urge to murder that gets triggered by imagery
But everyone has a sex drive, that easily gets triggered by images and words

You
Are
Retarded

look... i get that youre not well read on this.. but the vast majority of economists believe that immigrants are a net gain for an economy. even low-skilled migrants pay taxes (sales tax, tax incidence) and contribute just by consuming.

igmchicago.org/surveys/low-skilled-immigrants

the us already does accept a lot of high-skilled workers as well, which everyone agrees is beneficial. there should be a healthy mix between low-skill and high-skill laborers, but right now there's nothing to suggest we have a surplus of low-skilled migrants draining the system.
i guess there are no real nations since there's no perfectly homogeneous country

>i guess there are no real nations since there's no perfectly homogeneous country

I am arguing with an animal. You can't be this retarded.

If a country is made up of 90% whites and 10% blacks, flooding it with 50 million muslim arabs is going to change the demographics and make it a different nation. EVEN IF IT'S NOT INITIALLY PURE.

High skilled workers are a tiny minority.
Low skilled immigrants that are not even fluent in their own language will always be an economic loss.

You literally swallow state propaganda hook line and sinker.

low-skill immigration is good for everyone except (maybe) people without high school degrees (borjas is a notable opponent for this reason, but a lot of his work has been disputed)

In 1901,Dorland's Medical Dictionary,published in Philadelphia, continued to define "Heterosexuality" as "Abnormal or perverted appetite toward the opposite sex."

With this public perception about sex, can you imagine what the dirty songs back then would invoke from the general populace? No societal collapse, that's for sure.
Check out these songs from the 1930's with hyper explicit lyrics about suckin and fuckin all sloppy like
cracked.com/article_17625_7-songs-from-your-grandpas-day-that-would-make-eminem-blush.html

...

>igm panelists are state propaganda

ahhh i see.. funny how leftists and ethno-nationalists believe economics is some grand conspiracy. what does someone with a phd from a top university and tons of contributions to the field know that i cant prax out on my own, right?

uhhh.. if it has the same institutions and the original people in addition to new migrants i dont see how it's a different country...

question: how many immigrants does a country need to accept before it become a new nation? you seem to have thought this through.

And yet sexual activity is decreasing even though lyrics are supposedly getting worse, makes ya think

>Economists were never wrong or influenced by politics

10% of the population is already a massive irreversible change, and when migrants breed more than locals, it will completely change the country.

Look at britanistan now.

Because generation Zyklon B is going to save us and reject this culture.

. . . Baby One More Time [Jive, 1999]
Madonna next door (". . . Baby One More Time," "Soda Pop"). *

Oops! . . . I Did It Again [Jive, 2000]
"Oops! . . . I Did It Again"; "(I Can't Get No) Satisfaction" Choice Cuts

Yes, we must place our trust in whatever the majority of SCIENTISTS of the rigid HARD SCIENCE known as economics.

*known as economics believe

Leftists are the most docile obedient animals
They're the same people that would have went 100% full nazi if their government was nazi germany

Lol nice save, your worldview remains intact and you don't have to admit that you're wrong. Hoowee that was a close one!

But my points are right, sex is different than murder

i dont think life in britain is any different for the average person than it was decades ago (when the ira was blowing people up, lel)

im not as ambivalent to low-skill muslim immigration since there's the potential for culture clash, but in moderation and with efforts to assimilate i think it's doable. im not sure how britain demonstrates that the us immigration is a problem.

I'm done arguing with animals for today

Yea you're correct on that as far as I know, im no social scientist or psychologist

you realize that economics has moved beyond praxing, right? it's mostly numbers driven.

it's kinda sad to try to deligitimize experts in a field just because you disagree with their findings. literally feels>reals

>i dont think life in britain is any different for the average person than it was decades ago (when the ira was blowing people up, lel)

It was a localized conflict that didn't harm much british civilians


Current britain favors muslims, they literally have mob rule over the police with threats of riots if something goes against them

Watch this video if you want truth
youtube.com/watch?v=qWNpZ3Dwf68

"Experts in the field" led us to the housing market collapse

"Experts in the field" Did not predict the USSR collapsing

"Experts in the field" have their own agendas you know nothing of

You are an obedient little rabbit

>trusting cult leaders who defected to the alt-right just to get more clicks over actual experts

kek

He isn't the one telling anything, he's not british

I trust common people from britain more than I trust politicians and "experts in the field"

>physicists have been wrong before so gravity isnt real!!!!

just, take a course on econ instead of disputing the basis of the field because it hurts your feelings.

can you provide some examples to these "2017 lyrics"?

i think you've been watching too much porn/spending too much time on here

>literally anecdotes

im sure some black people who got called nigger in mississippi could tell you what a depraved hellhole the us is.

NANANA I CAN'T HEAR YOU

>implying economists don't disagree on many more issues than physicists due to the nature of their fields and that those disagreements aren't more heated and possibly politically fueled

WTF I love economists now, I can get RICH by just listening to a bunch of economists!

(((Economists)))
Yhea, we will hang you too.

why is sexuality in music bad

sounds like youre griping with the vapidity of pop music as a whole and honing in on one feature to make it seem like a newly established trend rather than something that's been ever present

Well yeah, this is how things are nowadays. Teen girls suck tons of dick, wear tight pants and short shorts on the daily in 2017.

Why is Ariana Grande such a slut?

It's not a joke though. Listen to Katy Perry's first album and she says literaly "I want your cock".