why isn't all classical like this? it would be so much more interesting and better
Why isn't all classical like this? it would be so much more interesting and better
Luke Martin
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
youtube.com
twitter.com
James Smith
dont you have anything better to do with your time than post stupid shit on Sup Forums
Gavin Powell
Why would repetition make things more interesting? wouldn't that make it the opposite.
Hardline minimalism has its place and subtle changes and phasing are fine, but personally I like constant harmonic changes - something Reich doesn't provide. I also like polyphony - another thing Reich doesn't provide. He rarely uses 1 good melody, let alone 2 different good melodies at once, both complimenting each other.
interesting to me is 4 voices playing different melodies, all interweaving and creating interesting harmonic changes and straddling a balance between memorable melodies and melodies that sound natural but you can't quite grasp them.
Easton Ward
dont you have anything better to do with your time than post reasonable content on Sup Forums
Noah Perez
dont you have anything better to do with your time than point out stupid shit on Sup Forums
Andrew Thomas
no
Levi Gutierrez
>He rarely uses 1 good melody, let alone 2 different good melodies at once, both complimenting each other.
What? The very essesnce of Reich's music is the conterpoint. The melodies he overlays are somewhat repetitive of course (very rarely does he repeat a bar without alteration), but Reich's music is always highly contrapuntal.
Luke Hughes
You don't know what counterpoint is.
Michael Butler
You don't know what counterpoint is.
Jacob Bell
this isn't classical.