How you like me now, RUSSIA?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=IJcuQQ1eWWI
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

woah easy there

>civ5
meh

this is madness

play some 6 nob

Sup Forums told me the AI for 6 is hot garbage.

Waiting for the first xpac.

absolutely disgusting

>AI for 6 is hot garbage.

it sucks at war, but the diplomacy is a challenge, now everyone hate you even faster.

yeah but they don't hate you for any good reason. it's just predetermined shit to do with the leader's victory type so you end up with certain factions guarenteed to hate you just for playing the game rather than because of your alliances or shit you did to them

"renember fung you" - Rahmkhaenghabahsvqjbsbiabz

Yep, I dunno how they fail this

>Sup Forums told me the AI for 6 is hot garbage.
So as in CiV 5. Even on highest difficulty it's too easy.

You're wrong, the AI is worse than in Civ 5.

Nope, AI sucks in all strategy games. Those games are designed to play with humans.

>Turn 350 (1930 AD)
>just researching Astronomy
how is that settler 1 difficulty working out for you, Singh?

nobody cares about you and your irrelevant shithole

เรากำลังฟังอยู่ (rao gamlang fang yu)

Means "We are listening."

>playing Civ

>hoi4
you can't possibly be serious

Singh is a Sikh surname. No one has that name here except a beer brand. And I'm playing on King. Like the King of Siam.

As you can see I already have infantry and research labs. Siam is modern.

civ was never designed to have good AI
youtube.com/watch?v=IJcuQQ1eWWI

>playing on settler 5
come on, sarawut, you surely can do better than that

>WW2 game
z-z-z

>M-muh relevancy
>Muh nukes
Lol

well at least that's not another shooter

But then it won't be king difficulty. Fit for King of Siam.

Sarawut is not a Thai name either.

WW2 shooters were only popular in 00's. Last thing I can remember was Red Orchestra 2.