Le white man scapegoat

>le white man scapegoat

face it
even if 'huwhites' had never in human history ever set foot on african soil it would still be the shithole it is today

it's a genetic thing

>africans has destroyed europe 1 time
>germans has destroyed europe 3+ times

really makes you think

looks comfy

>Karl V
>Bismarck
>Merkel
Am I missing anyone else

The "destroyed europe" meme is debatable, but even were to be true:
>africans have been in europe for decades
>germans have been in europe for millenia

*even if it were

No it really wouldn't be. There's a reason modern anthropologists warn against dragging the untouched amazon tribes into the modern world. If the European empires had not marched into Africa, enslaved the people and forced their culture on them, Africa would be an extremely different place today. They would always be technologically and scientifically lagging to Europe but it would be much more stable, safer and with much more of its own unique culture instead of a mishmash of what it was conquered by. I leave you with quote by an medieval Arab traveler Ibn Batutta and tell me if it sounds anything like modern Africa.

>The negroes possess some admirable qualities. They are seldom unjust, and have a greater abhorrence of injustice than any other people. Their sultan shows no mercy to anyone who is guilty of the least act of it. There is complete security in their country. Neither traveller nor inhabitant in it has anything to fear from robbers or men of violence. They do not confiscate the property of any white man who dies in their country, even if it be uncounted wealth. On the contrary, they give it into the charge of some trustworthy person among the whites, until the rightful heir takes possession of it.

wtf i love afrikans now

Show us some quotes from Arab travellers that talk about the rest of Africa, not just regions bordering the Sahara that had extensive trade and cultural exchanges with the Muslim world.

Shut the fuck up Kraut

That's from his travels to Zanzibar and he isn't biased at all, bit of cunt honestly always talks shit about everyone. Just before this he was just talking about how Africans are idiots. He never went past the Sahara. It doesn't negate anything I have said though.

Germany was the good guy the first two times though

Pretty sure it's about the Mali Empire.
>It doesn't negate anything I have said though.
Well yeah it does, because Africa is a massive continent and can't be represented by a select few empires in the middle ages that got ISLAM'D. Central and southern Africa was shit then, is shit now and would still be shit without European colonisation. And whether you put it down to genetics or geographical factors is irrelevant.

Did you even read or comprehend what I said you dense cunt. If Europeans hadn't gotten involved the Africans would have developed on their own. You seem to forget that Northern and Western Europe was a warring barbarian land for more than 6000 years before they wizened up. The bloody Norse didn't even have a written language until 800 A.D, thats 4000 years after the whole of the Middle East, Greece and Rome. Look at the Norse now, they have the HDI of any country.

No.
When Africa got invaded and great slavery began, they were starting producing metalworks near to early medieval level.

Due to such enviroment they developed slowly, but developed. Europeans (mostly) threw them centuries back.

>Did you even read or comprehend what I said you dense cunt.
No need to be rude.
>If Europeans hadn't gotten involved the Africans would have developed on their own.
Assuming no one else "got involved" instead of the Europeans, then perhaps. But this "development" in central and southern Africa would have been insanely slow due to living isolated from the rest of the world. It would be similar to how Abos "developed" - most lived in total isolation and never made it out of the stone age by the time Europeans showed up.

>The bloody Norse didn't even have a written language until 800 A.D, thats 4000 years after the whole of the Middle East, Greece and Rome. Look at the Norse now, they have the HDI of any country.
You can't compare Scandinavia to central and southern Africa. Completely different circumstances.

Colonists died all the time until we find medices capable of dealing with malaria. Farming is also impossible in many areas without artificial fertilisers. South and North Africa re the exceptions.

I'm sorry I'm just a bit a historyfag. It's exactly said, the southern and central Africans were developing at their own slow pace but they were developing. It's interesting since they completely skipped bronze working and went straight from stone to iron working. Exactly. You said it. Farming is impossible in some areas. All civilisations that appeared independently (China, Indus Valley, Sumer) all appeared because they were farming. Hunter Gatherers are harder to become "civilised"

Ok cool, glad you figured that out all on your own there with real evidence and reasoning. Unfortunately for youe theory, Europeans did colonize Africa so we have to deal with the repurcussions. Good to know you feel superior at least while getting cucked tho

Africa had empires before whites came in and fucked it all

Africa made your shitty peninsula a place of learning spic, if you hadn't revolted maybe you'd have something more than a growing debt

hey niggerboy, how about you go back to africa if you like it so much

arabs aren't africans

hey nazi i'll fuck you till you love me faggot

They came from Africa you idiot

Fucking hate niggers. Ruined America and now ruined Europe. Now I can never go see a Europe with actual Europeans living there.

...

Oooo look a tough racist on the internet, how strange and tough he must be

And we are taking america en less that 100 years.

I hate spics, but not as much as I hate niggers.

oh look a nigger who can use the internet thanks to white people

Lol we all know that it's you behind the monitor ibd von halalalm , don't lie

>During the 1950s, the US increasingly pressured the European states to accept decolonization. Winston Churchill had stepped down as British PM in 1955, now being 81 and feeling his strength finally fading. But the old lion was still stubborn about Britain's mission of taking up the white man's burden, and he bristled at Eisenhower's reminders that the 19th century was over. Regarding Africa, Churchill declared that the continent was not ready for self-governance and that it would probably not be until the turn of the millenium. The Belgians were even more emphatic. They insisted it would be at least 100 years before African independence was possible.

A couple of button presses are all it takes to turn your cunt into glowing green waste.

We weren't talking about North Africa, retard.

Well then when are you going to do it fag? lol because we taking your country by numbers is a very real thing kiddo (i know you are butthurt but be more realistic)

it's chinks their turn to milk the continent dry.

>In non-Muslim Africa, there were few anti-colonial revolts. Europeans had misruled Africa in many cases, but the sudden scuttle resulted in much worse, starting with what one incisive student of African affairs called a band of "crocodile liberators, Swiss bank socialists, quack revolutionaries, and gasping kleptocrats." The world's largest Christian cathedral rose in the home town of one of the continent's more successful "big men". Roads disintegrated in a manner similar to the fall of Rome.

>If Uganda had been kept under British rule another 20 years, as Churchill wanted, there may not have been an Idi Amin. Nor would there be a Sgt, soon president, soon emperor Jean Bidel-Bokassa, or the worst tyrant of all, Equatorial Guinea's Francis Macias Nguema. By 1990, the 47 countries and 500 million people of Subsaharan Africa had the total GDP of Belgium, a country of 11 million people.

Oh look a German guy who can use the internet thanks to Americans.

My ancestors came here from Germany. You saying Germans aren't white?