Why hasn't CGI been topped since this?
Why hasn't CGI been topped since this?
Other urls found in this thread:
It has.
Because wet objects are easy to make in CG.
where?
yeah makes rendering ur mom that much easier
Jurassic Park had better CGI than this, and it came out 2 decades earlier.
I was impressed in Terminator: Salvation when they had John Connor fight a T-800 at the end, and it looked exactly like 1984 Ahnuld.
Just rewatched Jurassic Park after reading your comment and can confirm you for being WRONG
Checked
Stop lying to yourself
If you watched movies not on youtube you will notice the skin and foot placement of that dinosur looks pretty bad and plasticy. This is mai waifu btw
Is it true Spielberg raped her while they were in the hurricane shelter?
Can't expect anything less from a jew.
DUD SHE'S 40 LMAO
s-shut up
toobehonest practical effects would look way better
Butthurt much?
warcraft
#MEGASHREKT
Shitloads of money.
It has
Is that Morgan Freeman or Samuel L. Jackson?
kek. Is this a joke?
Nope
She should play Hillary in the inevitable biopic after her presidency
You should cast movies bro
fourrrr fourrrsssssAH
> Godzilla 2014
> the two new Apes movies
...aaaand I'm spent.
Jones really was/is an amazing CGI job. I just think that the CG crew for the second and third movies were just uniquely spectacular; as you said, it really hasn't been "topped". Met, perhaps - but not topped.
I honestly ask myself this all the time. This was over a decade ago and somehow there just hasn't been anything since which looks this lifelike. The animation and lighting are both perfect.
It's not going to be possible to make anything with fur or hair look realistic for a long, long time. Like the bear in The Revenant, looked fake as hell and took me right out of it.