China is the future. China was the richest and most powerful country in the world for thousands of years...

China is the future. China was the richest and most powerful country in the world for thousands of years. The Chinese were creating empires and massive monuments while Germanics were running around naked and throwing rocks at each other.

It was only during the mid 19th to mid 20th centuries that China has been weak but China is no longer sick. China's current progress is unprecedented in the history of the world. It's literally China's destiny to rule the world again. You cannot avoid destiny.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Talas#Papermaking
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_wealth
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_Forms
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>tfw paper and thus printing press which enabled the entire Renaissance in the West was bought by the Abbasids to Europe because we managed to defeat China at its strongest point

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Talas#Papermaking

>implying chinks will suprass us

China is a miserable shithole where outside the tourist areas exists unimaginable poverty and suffering.

This.
They barely qualify as human beings. Soulless automatons with no imagination, ethics or values for life.

>China was the richest and most powerful country in the world for thousands of years
ebin maymay

Heard there is a huge influx of Chinese in Cambodia for investment and stuff. How do you deal with it?

To be a superpower, a nation needs four things: economic, diplomatic, military, and cultural strength. China has some of #1 and #3, not much of #2, and none of #4 at all.

real life isn't a game of Civ you fucking spastic

The chinese are nothing compared to the mightiest, strongest, portentous and yet most magnanimous, lofty and noble of the races: the jew. The jew shapes the world to his image, he rules over all other races, all of them are equally weak in comparison to the mighty jew, truly God's chosen people.

The jew moves the world of money, that's why there are so many jewish bankers; the jew moves the world of science, that's why there are so many jewish scientists; the jew moves the world of thought, that's why there are so many jewish philosophers; the jew moves the world of politics, that's why Israel, despite being so small in size, is big in diplomacy. The jew has suffered a lot through history, mighty empires tried to subjugate the jew, other races would've perished, but the jew survived. The jew has won unthinkable wars in less than the time that God took to make the universe to his image! Truly a marvelous and yet expected feat from the jew.

The most important man in history was a jew, the second tried to exterminate them. The first is praised through the entire globe, the second is called a evil. Any prevarication against the jew is frowned upon worldwide! The jew truly makes history takes its course.

china is the past
we've already surpassed them, but they were ahead of everyone else for millenia
emphasis on were

You need both high iqs and high testosterone to succeed. Chinks spent hundreds of years being ruled by nomad barbarians.

rome too was ruled by barbarians and they are no more

>but they were ahead of everyone else for millenia
Not really. China was well behind Europe and the Middle East for developing writing and metalworking. The earliest written records in the Middle East date from 3000 BC, the earliest oracle bone inscriptions in China are from 1500 BC.

There was at most a few centuries when China was more advanced than Europe, which was during the Dark Ages.

>richest
No. Japan overtook China.
Current ranking is 1.USA, 2.Japan, 3.China.

National Wealth
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_wealth

op said was, you illiterate netouyo

>30,000
>Beaten
Lol no
Chinks can muster literally hundreds of thousands men for war
That's a border skirmish by chink war standards

China has a fine habit of imploding in a civil war every 90 years that kills tens of millions.

this

is this the battle where they got DUTCHD

sui dynasties were barbarians anyway

>AD 612

The Sui Dynasty only lasted two emperors. The second was a megalomaniac who drove the country to ruin through vast building projects that utilized tens of thousands of slave laborers and launching an expensive, ill-advised war in Korea.

i know

>Europe in 1900: "Implying Americans will surpass us"

It's true though. All the most powerful countries have varying levels of those categories.

The US overtook Europe because they self-immolated in two world wars.

China will overtake USA because it's currently self-immolating with huge masses of dumb, lazy, hostile immigrants + toxic liberal values.

Chinese are everywhere aren't they?

Proxy Putinbot definitively spotted. Fifteen coins will be added to your account.

China is ascendant because it is being allowed to ascend by a decadent and complacent West, especially Communist America.

We must destroy China and destroy America too, in order to re-establish world White supremacy and the civilised Christian order.

>projections to 2050 hurrr

Imagine someone in January 1914 making predictions for 1950.

>it's all RUSSIA'S FAULT when reality becomes ugly

Germany was projected to be the next global superpower in 1914 and....yeah. It took just another three decades to turn it into a US protectorate.

Christianity in the Western World is dead and not coming back

We're well past the point of no return

YA TE VI, ISAAC.

>hurr USA will collapse and china will grow 20% every year! CHINA #1 PLEASE BUY MEIZU PHONE

China has more of #2 than it does of #3 or #4 insofar as actually projecting power goes.

I-I didn't even get fifteens coins onmy account or anything !
Why would I even w-wrok for Putin-sama I h-hate him! Baka!

Diplomatic strength? Not at all, they have almost no influence outside their immediate vicinity.

Not until America is wiped from the face of this planet, I agree.

The Westerners replaced Christianity with PC and multikulti. Look at how those advocates of PC and multikulti are as batshit crazy as much as Crusades (those PC people are depicting).

Will PC and multikulti serve as a good ideology to bond the West as one society?

I think people already know the answer

Even if America is wiped out, the damage is done. For example, the internet is likely to continue existing, and that alone is a huge roadblock for religiosity.

>USA will collapse
No, but it will become less efficient when the majority becomes non-white. Basically, you will become a decent South American country.

>and china will grow 20% every year
'no', but still faster than USA.

lol

SJW-ness is a form of (godless) religiosity, and the Internet is incredibly efficient at spreading it.

How will it become inefficient? China is growing faster because it's a third world dump. Show me a first world country that's growing at 8% like China.

There was nothing wrong with the Crusades.

It's solely because of American Communist values that we cannot simply crush the scum in to submission.

>SJW-ness is a form of (godless) religiosity, and the Internet is incredibly efficient at spreading it.
I don't think you know the meaning of the word religion.
Try "ideology" or "dogma".

>SJW-ness is a form of (godless) religiosity
Yea, it has a mesmerizing quality that attracts lots of people. But SJW-ness is more of 'you can whine and get gibs as much as you want if you are underprivileged' than actual ideology/religion that has a certain goal.
Still, I do think it is dangerous for the West
>the Crusades
I meant "as described by SJWs"

There was nothing wrong with the Crusades even as described in anti-Crusade histories. The value lens is just wrong.

It is Yang Guang's fault.

>How will it become inefficient?
Because at some point, a majority of Americans will be dumb, lazy, problematic non-whites?

>China is growing faster because it's a third world dump
And the Chinese are much more numerous than you. And they work much harder than you. When they become first-world just like us, America will not be big enough to compete, just like France is too small compared to America.

I don't think you know how to quote a post.

I know perfectly the meaning of the word "religion", and it's exactly what I meant--not "ideology" or "dogma".

Dogma is a religious term.

I think all sorts of radical ideologies (so-called "SJW"-ism, communism, egalitarianism, democracy, etc.) are essentially religious because they rely upon supernatural beliefs in things like rights, equality, unattainable ideals/utopias. It's no wonder these religions seek to destroy or warp Christianity - it's their biggest rival for souls (and power).

On top of the supernatural belief these ideologies all have different ways of signalling faith, rituals, and so on, very similar to practices in traditional religions.

>Because at some point, a majority of Americans will be dumb, lazy, problematic non-whites?
And I'm pretty sure that argument was used at some point 100 years ago and despite the ethnic population growing in the US, their economy has gone nowhere but up. To blame a countries economic slowdown on the ethnicity when said cunt has been ethnically diverse since it's creation isn't a strong argument.

So what does it say about China if they still can't beat us when America already is 40% nonwhite? And no, they really don't work harder than us lol.

Actually China is way too overpopulated to ever be an efficient, well-run, manageable society, but...

>Dogma is a religious term.
"Dogma can be used in various senses: in a formal sense to refer to an official system of principles or tenets of a church, such as Roman Catholicism,[3] or in a less formal sense to refer to positions such as those of a philosopher or of a philosophical school, or in a pejorative sense referring to enforced decisions, such as those of aggressive political interests or authorities."
Also in french it just means "ideas that are believed to be absolute truth" (roughly).
For example there's the sovietic dogma. As long as there is an ideology there is dogma.

Also if all ideas or ideologies that are based on abstract and/or illosory concepts were religions than religions would be a very very loose terms. For people like me that use the "monde des idées" or "theory of forms" ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_Forms ) to understand certain things that would essentially mean that every object, everything we can think about is a religion of it's own. And theory of forms aside that would also mean art is a religion, or math is a religion, since they both rely on concepts that have material uses, but no material existence.

I think we better use the standard definition of religion.

This user gets it.

But that's wrong. "Ethnic population" was actually decreasing in the USA 100 years ago (it was at its lower point ever), while Whites were stronger than ever.

>Whites in 1820: 81.6%
>Whites in 1920: 89.7%

>Blacks in 1820: 18.4%
>Blacks in 1920: 9.9%

Now Blacks are growing again (albeit slowly), and Whites are lower than ever in American history.

That's because America received a lot of immigration from Europe. Blacks have always had higher birthrates than Whites. If there weren't any European immigrants America probably would've been 30% Black by now.

Sure. But what matters is that America became a major power because it became overwhelmingly white (in relative and absolute terms).

>illusory concepts that structure the whole life of the believers, establish a bond between them, change society, need to be hammered literally every day, have their own saints, etc.

>But that's wrong. "Ethnic population" was actually decreasing in the USA 100 years ago (it was at its lower point ever), while Whites were stronger than ever.

And now the black population is at its highest and where's the US economy? That's my point, if the ethnic population (not just backs) have grown to where they are now, and the economy hasn't suffered but instead gotten stronger to the point where its stayed on top, then the argument is already wrong to a point.

Another good point is that China's domestic demand is so low, they're reliant on Western consumption. If niggers take over, get lazy and dont consume or work, it's China's economy that will take a larger hit than the US. The US economy relies and supplies to itself, the Chinese economy doesn't.

Platonic realism, at least, is a theory of the forms that is entirely devoid of supernatural belief.

In any event you're twisting my words. Religion isn't in the object but in the subject.

There's also a difference between entertaining a concept as a tool or as a useful fiction, and genuinely believing in and pursuing it.

No, America became a superpower because it developed a strong military and economy and then our culture dominated the world. Britain and France committing suicide and Germany dragging Europe down with them also helped. Our only real competitor throughout history was the USSR. Our only possible threat is an internal force neutering our military or economy. Both parties are pro-war so our military isn't going to become weak anytime soon. The only way China can threaten us is by replacing as the economic center of the world. That is a very real threat and the recent failure of TPP/TTIP is a hint that our economic strength is becoming weaker. Personally, I am not so sure that's entirely bad because those trade deals along with NAFTA give corporations too much power but on the other hand a country's economic power is through its corporations.

>illusory concepts that structure the whole life of the believers, establish a bond between them, change society, need to be hammered literally every day, have their own saints, etc.

>economical policies like capitalism, communism or socialism are now religions
>social policies such as legalism, nuclear families or slavery are now religions
>each types of art are now religions
If ideas that influence people, create communities, have an influence on society and famous people in it are religions, the script for hte fast and furious is a religion.

Spain had plans to conquer china in tge 1500s.

If one believed that a film about car-racing contained some fundamental truth, and for example started to imitate parts of the film with a genuine belief that this was a meaningful spiritual/moral pursuit, then yes, that would be a religion (albeit, quite a frivolous one).

>what is rome and italy

China has to be the single most overrated civilisation ever.

China is shit and this dumb Spaniard is just a chink with a proxy

China will die soon, they are going they way of Japan but will fall much harder

this
only gets kudos because it was completely isolated from other major civilizations for so long
meanwhile Mesopotamian states, Greek states, Egypt, Phoenicians, Hittites and so many more were all in the same little area.

china is shit, but let's not pretend vietnam isn't even shittier

I'm not pretending Vietnam will take over the world

Not that guy, but of course, no one pretends our economy is any better.

Vietnam has 500,000 Amerincans dead in tgeur soil though

This.

>little area
To be fair, it wasn't that little of an area. I mean, the distance from Athens to Persepolis isn't nothing by any means.

Blacks are not at their highest in relative terms, they're way below their situation in 1800. But what really matters is the majority.

American economy is declining compared to the rest of the world--it's not as dominant, and American Whites themselves are not as dominant. Anyway, the root of the problem is that the Whites are dwarfed everywhere in the world.

China is working to increase consumption of its domestic market, it was last year's big debate in China.

Not disagreeing with your post, I'm just saying that USA became so dominant in the first place because it imported an astonishing number of Whites. They're the ones who boosted your economy and military. With a non-white majority, you should have non-white standards in your military or economy (corruption, laziness, etc.).

>hurrrr

why are Americans so dumb to believe China is a threat?
China is powerful because the US is powerful
and it has basicly zero cultural impact outside of its borders

even here, right beside china, with thousands of years of their influence, we have no modern Chinese cultural influence and loads of Japanese/Korean/Filipino and others.
Hong Kong excluded of course

a resurgent Russia that can solve its population issues is a much bigger threat and US officials know this

much less than the distance from any Chinese city to the Indus or western Eurasia

>China will die soon

Based on what?

my butthurt

have you not been paying attention for the last 30 years? economists have consistently been saying that china will collapse, smart ones too.

You can turn your VPN off now

>tfw quality and offensive ideas

Fucking kek

But I'm only putinbot here, faggot

At the US's current rate. It might self-immolate in a second civil war. You're probably the country with the most divisive population right now.

Russia's population is too small compared to USA, and its economy is a meme outside of commodities exports.

It will not be a serious economic rival for decades (if ever), only a diplomatic and military one.

America received a lot of European immigrants in the late 1800s and early 1900s. They came because America was already strong and getting stronger but it had not yet surpassed Western Europe.

it was never an economic rival during the USSR either
Russia just needs to sort its social issues

It's still not collapsing though. No one "collapses" like this. It's just wishful thinking.

and a lot of people thought of America as a sleeping giant in the 1800s even
its economy was massive and its people were wealthy, well fed and educated

America proved it could batter European powers with ease during the 19th century, and in the 20th it stopped with its "americas only" policy and immediately became the big guy 4U in Europe
only big rivals were Russia and the UK

China will die by following in Japan's footsteps. Koreans were smart enough to not completely copy Japan and that's why their GDP per capita is going to surpass Japan in a few years and their brands are killing Japan.

Korean culture is growing more powerful too

Japan everything looks like its from the 90s, and they are really behind in technology adoption. they still use fax and pen/paper for most things in business, even e-mail is a big deal still.

>comparing 80s Japan with a third-world country that has ten times its population

Don't you see the problem?

>a third world country manages to have the debt levels, housing market bubble, and declining working age population of a developed country

Don't you see the problem?

>American economy is declining compared to the rest of the world

Of course, because the most of the world is still developing. Developing countries have higher and faster economic growth when compared to already developed countries. But all countries, developed or developing slow down eventually. In China's case, it's their strong, cheap labour force which is already reaching record high wages and still going up.

>China is working to increase consumption of its domestic market, it was last year's big debate in China.

And it's expected to take more than 35 years for China's rural village population to match that of those who live in economic centres like towns or cities, and those people who live in rural villages are the lack of domestic demand.

give back our rightful clay already !!

Always the spanish chink chonk

>he'll quote me sayng shit about brazil

America is the powerhouse, it would take something insane to take it out
I don't even think nuclear war could do it