Childs was the thing.
Childs was the thing
Other urls found in this thread:
Carpenter said he wasn't.
Stop fucking making these threads, you absolute fucking moron.
Then why didn't he spit out the kerosene at the end like a normal human would?
It's like you didn't even watch it
Shut the fuck up, dick
We know this, user.
Its been a while but he blew it up didn't he? If he was the Thing what did he mean by that?
Read the continuation comic. Childs was human.
He's actually a thing in comic. Human in vidya game.
>tfw he's not joking
>finale is left ambiguous so both options are left open
>Sup Forums AGGRESSIVELY fights to destroy the director's vision and force one singke solution, robbing the ending of its depth and scope
What did they mean by this?
I always thought MacReady was the thing
No. They were all experiencing cabin fever. There was no Thing. They did it all to themselves.
The whole reason it's ambiguous is so people would talks about a build fun theories. As long as they're actually fun and not kerosene.
Funny, that's exactly what the thing would say.
they were childs
Oh Lorddy Childs dindoo nuffin child.
lel
This retarded fan theory is right up there with "somerset was the real killer" and "ferris was in cameron's imagination" in terms of sheer stupidity.
It's beenn adressed and explicitly dismissed by Carpenter himself.
SO KNOCK IT THE FUCK OFF.
Mills was actually the killer.
that ferris theory sounds interesting desu
I think we need to discus the bonus situation.
...