I actually can't think of the benefit of multiculturalism other then food can you name one just one Sup Forums

I actually can't think of the benefit of multiculturalism other then food can you name one just one Sup Forums

thicc black ladies

I like going to the city train station and playing the star wars cantina theme in my head

it's exciting you never know whats gonna happen haha

its like "hey lol am i gonna get raped today" lmao hahah

You should go inside a no-go zone and film your raping.

Chaos and disorder

What's the advantage of no multiculti

I don't think I've had any problems with it desu
Don't get me wrong, I still want aus to be majority British/Anglo descent but I don't mind some from here and there.

This

asians and indians generally okay as long as they remain the small minority black cunts like the sudanese though can fuck off.

ask your women :)

It's what separates us from the unwashed hordes beyond the Carpathians, it defines our culture

Most of people on int or pol don't know what multiculturalism means. Most of people just call the fact they have immigrants multiculturalism while it's absolutely wrong.
Multiculturalism was the idea invented in Canada in 70s. The idea was to let all the cultures coexist together and do nothing to mix them. Leafs created it to solve their Quebec problem. Than Europe adopted it and 80s and 90s were the time when multiculturalism, instead if melting pot, was imposed. It caused many shitty consequences like creation of various insular immigrant societies, problems with people finding jobs etc so in early 00s Europeans stopped implementing multiculturalist policies and switched to "integration" aka melting pot. Some countries, like France for example, never used multiculturalism.
People just don't know what they are talking about.
Multiculturalism is shit, melting pot is great in my opinion, when all the cultures mix together creating something new and unique. USA, Canada, Australia are good examples.

before that australia has no culture

chinks wont make anything new but other might

>Good food
>Good women
>Good comedy

There's nothing more boring than homogeneity.

I thought people on int are just ironically against multiculturalism

the opportunity to fugg brown qts (male)
I mean, I never will because I'm fat autist but a man can dream

You think the USA is great?

>Multiculturalism was the idea invented in Canada in 70s. The idea was to let all the cultures coexist together and do nothing to mix them.

What the fuck am I reading. Canada didn't adopt a multiculturalist policy until the 2000s and we certainly didn't invent that shit.

>The Canadian government has often been described as the instigator of multicultural ideology because of its public emphasis on the social importance of immigration.[16][17] The Canadian Royal Commission on Bilingualism and Biculturalism is often referred to as the origins of modern political awareness of multiculturalism.[18] In the Western English-speaking countries, multiculturalism as an official national policy started in Canada in 1971, followed by Australia in 1973 where it is maintained today.[19][20][21][22] It was quickly adopted as official policy by most member-states of the European Union.

Read fucking wiki you retard.

There is probably nothing really worth from multiculti. However that doesnt implies it is bad. The current problems are caused by the obsession with importing the lowest scum in the world en masses.

First world should be importing it's wonders to countries in need. Not importing the problems from hellholes. Put schools in Africa instead of female mutilation centers in London...

t.know barbarism from first hand

Well, you have your share of problems, I personally dont like how your education works, but boi, your country is great.

I'm not btw, but I agree that melting pot works very nice if not abused.

What sort of barbarism?

Multiculturalism has no benefits, multiculturalism is the result of pursuing a policy that has benefits.

allahu akbarbarism

How come multicultural and tolerant nations are the most successful nations in the world while racist monocultural nations like Eastern European ones are shitholes?

Australia is a good example of the benefits of multiculturalism

We'd still be a backwater if it weren't for migration

I'm going to explain it in the best way I can.

The idea of multiculturalism can be traced back to Voltaire.

Voltaire grew up in a time where religious toleration was entirely unheard of. At a given time, he went to England and had been overcome in the drastically different level of toleration found there. France only tolerated one sect/religion and also did not tolerate unorthodox ideas. England, he found, was much more tolerant of differing religions. He described the toleration as thus: "Go into the Exchange in London, that place more venerable than many a court, and you will see representatives of all the nations assembled there for the profit of mankind. There the Jew, the Mahometan, and the Christian deal with one another as if they were of the same religion, and reserve the name of infidel for those who go bankrupt."

Voltaire then concluded, citing his tolerant homeland France, that a country having two major religions would result in civil war. But a country having many significant religions was prosperous.

Transylvania would be a developed nation if it were independent

Local cuck porn

History matters, you know.

multiculturalism can only result of destruction of all cultures to a unique aknowledge one, people supporting multiculturalism are dumb and don't understand they are destroying the diversity in this world

>instead of female mutilation centers in London...
Female mutilation is illegal.

something to do with breeding and children having lower probability of inheriting any major problems from either parent.

also, I have heard of how different languages make people think differently, I guess that can be a good thing when we leave in a free society.

Cultural (((Enrichment))).
We are enjoying the wonderful Muslim traditions of terrorism, hate circle and murder.

>multiculturalist
as in melting pot, not actual multiculturalist

Your wife will taste some quality BBC and one day you'll knock on your daughter's room only to find her getting ganged banged by negros and muslims.
That's hot you won't have to watch cuck porn, just drop your pants and start jacking off.

multiculturalism has eroded Australian culture Tbh

*live

I need to leave for work!

>cultures mix together creating something new and unique. USA, Canada, Australia are good examples.
But they're not though. They're just White Anglo countries, the only difference being America had blacks as a result of slavery. And even America was overwhelmingly white until it about 60-70 years ago when they dropped their racially selective immigration quotas. Oh and Canada had the Frenchies in the East, but none of that is anything like the wacky shit we're seeing in the West now.

We're getting more multicultural.

My arab dad has like 2 American patents and payed his taxes since 25 years. Whats wrong with that?

American culture is definitely different thanks to the g*rman influence

Australia and Canada are broadly English though

succesful nations have (mostly) become muticultural and tolerant not the other way around

Melting pot
Oh the Jewish meme?
Lol, no.

Wikipedia is full of shit then and doesn't know what 'multicultural' means. In practise we were a melting pot with the obvious exception of Quebec. In that sense only were we "multicultural". Multiculturalism as you know it today began in Europe.

Western nations were the most successful nations in the world when they were racist and monocultural. If Eastern Europe becomes multicultural and tolerant it will still be a shithole.

probably because the successful nations are the ones people from other countries want to move to

1 example, here indigenous towns are often allowed to rule themselves under "customs and habits"because muh oppressed cultures, leading to shit like semi-legaly exchanging daughters for cows, shit alike honor killings and lynchs.

People always say this, can you name one way that Germans influenced the US? They still seem pretty English to me.

we became successful after the White Australia policy was dropped and we started letting in Southern European migrants, Indians, Koreans, SEAs and the Chinese

...

Wrong.
Dude just check Wikipedia. Fucking lazy leaf.

midwest is very german
autistic land toilers

We aren't as hideous looking for starters

I can't, but I can also look at American culture and see that it isn't very English. The Germans in America are the only thing that really separates America from the rest of the anglosphere, so I'm just going to assume that was what did it.

You could say it's from them declaring independence, but anglo South Africans and Zimbabweans are still English.

we became so successful, so fast, that we needed more laborers than we could ever get from our open population.

in comes multiculturalism -- wala, instant laborers from other lesser countries to work in our factories

multiculturalism wouldn't be an issue if the native population could do their one job right -- fuck and reproduce

Germans were pretty much the most different group allowed in America. And they were still white Protestants. Then South Euros, Jews and Slavs in the early 20th Century, and then just everything after the 1960s. But before that, it's completely false to say America was a "melting pot". It was predominately people from the British isles or German blooded Protestants. And blacks, which were segregated in this "melting pot".

As a child of immigrants, natives are good for nothing vermin scum who should be worshipping immigrants for the food we provide them

As your post indicates, at this point multiculturalism is just a buzzword to apologize certain barbarian ideas that in the long run oppose tolerance. What would Voltaire think of current London and Paris? What would he think about the Charlie Hebdo incident?

We'd manage without you.

>wala
seriously nigger?

And it was illegal AND not happening 50 years ago.

In what way do you think Australia improved afterwards? Australia has definitely become a wealthier country in recent decades, but I'd say that's the result of the mining boom.

Same with us, but obviously not to the same degree as America. The World Wars also showed us that Australia's security was dependent on significantly increasing our population.

I don't really have a problem with most of our migrants. The English, Irish and white South Africans obviously fit right in here. The Vietnamese and South Asians are generally very good at assimilating, with a few exceptions. The Chinese and Lebanese less so, but hopefully the third generation is going to be better in that regard like with the Italians and Greeks.

Not having non assimilating colonies that increase social conflicts.

...

That's right.
>The food we provide them.
Soon.

Ayyyyy filthy dumb French scum you're the reason Montréal is a shit hole

Mostly money, yeah. It also helps with national security. The recent mining boom only really explains Australia's economic security during the 2000s, and even then lots of workers in the mines were from other countries. Mining is mostly driven by Western Australia, which is only ever the richest state when mining is in a boom. The state is currently slipping into a recession, but the overall economy is still growing thanks to New South Wales and Victoria

Fuck you now it won't stop

asian gfs

A great population is not necessary for Australia to prosper. Look at the population they have compared to the rest of Asia, yet Australia has a GDP double that of Indonesia.

Australia's strength lies in its inheritance of classical and british civilisation and traditions. A population increase is good, but if it comes at the cost of giving up the culture and society that has been built up it will be a damaging influence overall.

>not embracing the lingua franca of Sup Forums

Reddit is that way la

Are you in 1820 or what?
How can anyone sane deny the huge influence of Irish, Jewish, Italian, Hispanic cultures in USA?

>Jewish
Kek

Australia and New Zealand also have lots of Italians and Irish there. American culture predates major hispanic migration too.

Don't laugh, they have a Jewish president.

Do you know that modern USA South-West was a Mexico before 1848 and was inhabited by Mexicans?
>It was predominately people from the British isles or German blooded Protestants
Before 1840s when they started receiving the huge amount of Irishman and before the 1860s when Chinese immigration started.

No terror attack,

No, a greater population is definitely necessary for Australia's prosperity. That's why our restrictive migration policies were lifted in the first place. The phrase that used to get thrown around at the time was "populate or perish".

I don't think you understand that we didn't just throw our borders wide open either. We've had a sizeable, but controlled migration stream for 70 years and Australia's culture and society is still intact. We're going to continue doing so and I don't see that adversely affecting the country.

Not getting robbed
Better paid jobs
Less unemployment

it's voila
if you were trolling me then congrats

In our case we were mist successful when we forced assimilation.

If by multiculturalism you mean this "let foreigners live in my country without any assimilation or integration" you are completely right. But in some countries which have different nationalities or ethnicities living on their ancestral land multiculturalism is necessary to keep their society stable and free of violation of human rights.

I think that's it. If you want to keep your culture - stay on your ancestral land, if you move to another country - integrate. Otherwise you are a conqueror and an occupant, just like in ancient times.

/thread

Know allahu akbarism from first, second and third hand.

You mistake cause and consequence. It's not
>we get multiculti and import some arabs
>we get really progressive
>we lead world
It's more like
>we are in lucky spot\have opportunity
>use it right
>lead world
>abundant time gives human being thoughts about "humanism"
>country gets opened to arabs and other guys

If you look at countries and empires who was superpowers in history, a lot of them was homogenous, and a lot of them was diverse. Rome, Russia, America, Golden Horde, China, British Empire and a lot of other superpowers was never trying to make different cultures to coexist in first place, they were taking best inventions they seen, reverse-engineer them and upgrade for their cause.
Examples:
>British opium fuckery back then
>Romans using barbarians in their legions
>Chinese melding various kingdoms with all their shit in one big China
>Russians adopting european navy, a lot from asian food back in time, and having a lot of Caucasus "muslims" in army now.
>Americans culturally dominating world now, the whole "guys, you can migrate here if you're really good specialist" thing
Et cetera. Which guides us to simple answer: country gets powerful not if it tries to import arabs, but if it watches for best shit it can get from all over the world, and uses this shit if possible.

truthbombs

Japan has their own terrorists. But yeah, there is no ISIS attacks at least.

We are entering the world of mass automation very soon. Life will not be about the quantity of a country's people, but the quality.

Any country which ignores the family and has a declining birth rate, as Australia does, and seeks to make up for this by importing foreign groups, will not last in the long term. It's a pyramid scheme which leads to the replacement of the indigenous population which could have great consequences, which we are just learning about fully through the science of genetics.

Don't let too many Chinks in.

But USA was a complete shithole before the second half of 20th century.
What a stupid pic. If Japan would pose a threat to ISIS no wonder jihadists would try to attack Tokyo. They don't even need immigrants, they may come with tourist visas.

Schlomo. Please.
Stop the relativist bullshit.

What the fuck, I thought that your police literally kills scum on notice. Is "kill this criminal fuck at an instant" principle applied only to cartels?

it's also funny how it has to specifically say "islamic terrorism" so that they don't have to mention Aum Shinrikyo

>payed his taxes since 25 years
So he wasn't paying before then? If your dad acts like an American and not like an Arab there is nothing wrong. If he acts like a MENA savage then there is a problem.

what?

Why are you looking for benefits? Are you looking for reasons to justify it being desirable?

The real question is - to what extent are you entitled to enforcing your will onto other people?

However if you are dead set on fishing for good things about it, I suppose you could argue that a diverse society will be able to offer wider variety of responses to a given challenge
(leaving aside that "wider variety" could include responses like "behead it or throw acid in its face"), richer cultural life and a more varied pool of talents (with similar caveats as the aforementioned one).

Ironic to Khan stance then, "terrorism is part and parcel of Islam existing", since all the other forms of terrorism are marginal.

Yeah ours and Canada's reservations can be pretty fucked up too.

He is spot on.