1: Ur flag

1: Ur flag
2: How you feel about lolis
3: Who's you're favourite lolicon artist

>1: Fenlan
>2: They're miracles of the universe
>3: White Datura

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_child_pornography
arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/02/justice-naps-man-jailed-16-months-for-refusing-to-reveal-passwords/
legislationline.org/documents/id/8909
un.org/depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/NOR_penal_code.pdf
lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/2005-05-20-28/KAPITTEL_2-11#KAPITTEL_2-11
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

kyttäjuttu

Neekeri

r-rustle

Good taste, friend!

I actually translated some Rustles a while back.

>Flag
>*Sirens in a distance*
>Judge writing you sentencing terms

redlight too

You're being silly, lolis aren't illegal in norway.

France
sorry i'm not a pedophile/nonce or whatever the name is

>sorry i'm not a pedophile
That's very unfortunate. How did that happen?

Actually, yes
"Depictions of minors in any serious sexual manner is prohibited to protect children from being sexualized in media"
Or something to that effect. Meaning you could be sent to jail for something as minor or lolicon-fanfiction. In theory.

>nudity is sexual
kys Dane.

Pictures aren't minors, though. They aren't even people. So I think you're misunderstanding something there.

To the best of my knowledge, only the commonwealth fags are so retarded that they'd make drawings illegal.

Also this:

>1: My flag
>2: They're cute, but wouldn't mind if they didn't exist
>3: -

It is the law of the land
I didn't make them
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_child_pornography
No one has been sent to jail yet, but it's just a matter of time. People have already been spied on by the secret police (Norwegian FBI) for importing sextoys with suspicious packaging. And a guy got a few more years slapped on his sentence just cause they could when they raided his home for other offenses.

Is this porn to you?

No, but such a statue could never be made under today's political climate. Images/art online is still different, otherwise the statue would be taken down long ago.

That page also lists it as being illegal for Finland which is flat out wrong (ours is only illegal if it is made in a manner which involves an actual living and breathing child). I'm guessing nobody just bothered to challenge the sentences.

But it's completely possible that the law says some thing but the courts interpret it as they please, like they're doing in Clapistan regarding their fifth amendment.

arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/02/justice-naps-man-jailed-16-months-for-refusing-to-reveal-passwords/

Leaving aside the pedo/lolicon meaning behind that pic, that's some really nice artwork.

Isn't it? He does some completely non-H stuff too.

>Argentina green
>Iceland, Bulgaria, Ukraine, Belarus, SKorea, Southeast Asia red
dafaq
is it legal to have child porn in Argentina? and illegal to have any kind of porn in SKorea?
what is the penalty?

Porn is just blocked in sk not illegal to own. Illegal to produce though.

It's pretty messed up when the naked human body is considered pornographic. Seems Saudi Arabia tier. Now if OP's pic was having sex or masturbating with a dildo I could understand but just standing around doing something mundane shouldn't be considered pornographic. Whether they are nude or not. It reminds of those people who think breastfeeding is pornographic. A completely natural, human activity twisted by repressed minds into something it's not.

Never claimed it was accurate for Finland, or any other cunt, but it is accurate for Norway.
As pointed out in Norwegian criminal code §310 and §311

御免なさい

You could read the law yourself if you find it in english, it's criminal code §310, 311 and 317

kill yourself
kill yourself
kill yourself subhuman

26th post best post

>§ 310. If any subordinate fails to show proper obedience in the ship's service under such circumstances as would endanger the vessel or human life he, and also any person who causes or is accessory to such conduct, shall be liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years.

>§ 311. If two or more members of the crew by mutual agreement fail to show proper obedience in the ship's service under such circumstances as would endanger the vessel or human life, they, and any person who causes or is accessory to such conduct, shall be liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding four years.

>§ 317. Any person who receives or obtains for himself or another person any part of the proceeds of a criminal act, or who aids and abets the securing of such proceeds for another person shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable to fines or imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years. Aiding and abetting shall be deemed to include collecting, storing, concealing, transporting, sending, transferring, converting, disposing of, pledging or mortgaging, or investing the proceeds. Any object, claim or service substituted for the proceeds shall be regarded as equivalent thereto.

legislationline.org/documents/id/8909
un.org/depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/NOR_penal_code.pdf

Yes, clearly lolis are illegal according to the norwegian penal code.

>Finds the wrong fucking laws
>Hurr durr you are wrong about your own laws
lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/2005-05-20-28/KAPITTEL_2-11#KAPITTEL_2-11

So I read through the translated versions, and it clearly states that it's illegal to possess pornographic pictures of people under the age of 18.

Are drawings people?

>finnish flag
of course

According to the law they are "depictions of minors", if it can be reasonable defended in court as art. Aka your (presumed) op pic, yes, legal, if it's hentai tagged with loli, illegal.

Section 310 clearly states that with "child" they mean a person under the age of 18.

>Med bot eller fengsel inntil 3 år straffes den som overværer en fremvisning av seksuelle overgrep mot barn eller fremvisning som seksualiserer barn. Med barn menes person under 18 år.

>Med barn menes person under 18 år.

Section 311 adds this:

>Med barn menes i denne paragrafen personer som er eller fremstår som under 18 år.

Are pictures people, then?

It is sad that most people lose their positive attitude they have in childhood.

I think sexual depiction of lolis is alright. It's more popular among men than It's considered. People are just afraid to be labeled as sick monsters who molest kids. Molesting is bad though. Personally I just prefer sexually attractive women with developed features regardless of their age (like men really do) and the moment girls become attractively shaped can be very early. I also encourage early relationships among kids. Not chaotic sleeping around but proper relationships. I believe that kids love can blossom and become a base for a good happy family if parents let their kids do it and even hepl and observe.

no, that's heretical

What's heretical?

Lolis aren't usually even realistic depictions of children, they usually have mature features to them like wide hips or full butts.

There are some studies that suggest that the majority of men are ephebophiles with a sizable portion of hebephilia thrown in as well. It's just that most don't have the guts to admit it with the society being as it is.

Yes, according to previous trails hentaicharacters are defined as "people" in order to combat sexualized depictions in society in order to protect real children.

sauce

This is literally just pedophilia.

This is copy pasta from /his/ discussing free speech on Sup Forums but I feel it's relevant

"I've been permabanned for posting excerpts from studies finding that incidence of CSA (child sexual abuse) has practically no predictive power for determining the likelihood of negative outcomes in adults, and that the concept is better explained in terms of physical and emotional abuse, with the understanding that nonabusive childhood sexual encounters can and do occur. Literally not even an endorsement of pedophilia, just a suggestion that we should rethink how we talk about CSA."

Basically what user was saying is that it's not sexual activities which harm the children per say but physical and emotional abuse that accompanies sexual relations. Probably something to that, I've been masterbaiting since I've been 5 years old and if some beautiful women wanted to fondle my dick at that age I would have liked it.

Cite them

White Datura, silly.

That literally is not just paedophilia.

I agree, it sounds like common sence.

But I understand peoples' fear. they are afraid of abusers. Low age of consent could be easily exploited in twisted ways. People also hate to think and analyze.

Sums up my opinion on the matter as well. Raep is obviously bad, but is it really raep if a child has a sexual experience?

Also seeing how kids can fuck each other as much as they like and how the only thing that's actually illegal is for adults to possess pictures or for adults to have participated in the sexual activity, it's like the lawmakers themselves are saying that it's not the action that's wrong, it's adults being involved with kids that's bad. But is it really true that a child having a sexual experience with an adult is always rape and abusive? I don't think so.

It's as if they just threw their arms up in the air and stated that they don't want to deal with figuring out when sex is abusive and when it isn't. I don't approve of child abuse in any way, but I think that lazy lawmaking is bad.

But this really doesn't have anything to do with lolis.

Lolicons should all get vanned.
And I intend to work for the government to make sure it happens.

You people make me fucking sick

I dunno but that's not a great picture. The buttocks seems off kilter with the torso.