Why do performers/conductors refuse to add dynamics or rhythmic tempo changes to Bach's works when Baroque practice was to leave that shit to performers? Also why do the majority of Bach's cadences end with that trill sounding thing?
/classical/
Jace Lopez
Aaron Ross
actually I never really understood the point of trills inthe first place. What do they add to the music?
Carter Scott
Unironically this.
Cameron Collins
...
Mason Price
I would hang out with Scriabin guy. He introduces normies to c-list composers and doesn't afraid of anything
Brayden Campbell
>Scriabin
>c-list
Christian Carter
the lists have nothing to do with quality, just popularity and recognition. Here's how I break it down.
A list- composers whom everyone knows because they are cultural memes (includes names like Bach, Beethoven, Brahms, Mozart the Liszt goes on ;^) )
B list- Composers who have pops but aren't especially known for their personalities (Verdi, Mendelssohn, Schumann etc...)
C list- composers who don't have pops but are still well known by classical enthusiasts (Scriabin, Schoenberg, Messiaen etc...)
D List- Literally who? (Zelenka, Martinu, Langgaard etc...)
Luke Adams
D List- Hindemith, Rautavaara, Schnittke
Andrew Harris
Z List - Petzold
Adrian Powell
Entirely Bach's fault