So former Harry Potter actresses are going nude in Playboy now. What went wrong?

So former Harry Potter actresses are going nude in Playboy now. What went wrong?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=0FJ17x0IoKs
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

[citation missing]

Sir, I'm going to need proof of that.

>luna is ugly now

>Adult women posing for nude photographs.

What's the problem?

>now

DAMN

fug you man

10 points to Slytherin.

who is this? who did she play?

She is Irish.

She probably spent an hour in regular sunlight and that was it for her skin.

Damn mami

Moar mon ami

...

Pansy Parkinson.

>Nobody female wannabe actor needs to draw some attention.

Showing the good before getting famous is a desperation move. She will never make it really big. She can only hope to become first lady if she is lucky.

>literally who

whom

She's literally engaged to Hugh Hefner's son, who I believe runs the magazine.

Literally who are you quoting?

Wew

>Only a Marxist would like tits!

Huh, I guess I'm a Commie then.

>Just bee yourself.
Provided you are rich of course.

lovely boobie!!!!

Scarlett Byrne had already been nude in one of the Lake Placid movies.

I don't know how to help you with your reading comprehension issues user.

That bitch on the left had one line in HBP and delivered it HORRIBLY. She makes me angry.

I imagine there being anything to read in his quote would be a good place to start

...

I though Playboy doesnt feature naked women anymore?

Her parents must be proud.

Her nudes will be more beneficial to humanity than her appearence in easily one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

LIIIIIIIIIIIIIUNK

This. Playboy stopped doing nudes a long time ago, if she really is going to pose it'll just be in her underwear at most.

I know it's a meme but that image pisses me off.

They stopped a year ago and they're already going back in the March/April issue because it flopped.

had a good chuckle, thanks

Great opening

Well, they should be doing what they do best.

youtube.com/watch?v=0FJ17x0IoKs

he's the son of a wealthy media mogul. also, playboy doesn't even do nudity anymore