>In The Avengers, 74 died in what is known in the MCU as the Battle of New York.
>In Captain America: The Winter Soldier, only 23 were killed.
>In Avengers: Age of Ultron, 177 were claimed, which is pretty low considering it was an entire city lifted and dropped to Earth.
>9/11 had more deaths.
Why do these manchildren insist on playing pretend and diluting themselves against reality. Especially those who rail against the Man Of Steel death count. You know exactly what I mean.
I only enjoy the Netflix shows. The movies are fucking beyond terrible.
/11 had more deaths.
911 dubs
You do realise that in the Marvel movies the heroes make a point of evacuating civilians, drawing enemies away from populated areas, and using their powers or tech to protect people in harm's way, right?
Whereas in MoS it was HAHA LASERS THROUGH BUILDINGS and shit with zero fucks given for innocent bystanders.
The marvel numbers seem low, and I suspect the source is your ass, but there's a very good reason their kill count is going to be lower. They are shown actually giving a shit about people, unlike Superman and Batman.
All comics fans are equally despicable, they ruined action movies for the rest of the world. It's been 15 years for christ sake. FUCK YOU.
If DC is so good then why Ben left?
>The marvel numbers seem low, and I suspect the source is your ass,
There's a montage in Civil War where it shows the casualty counts for all the major incidents.
They kind of hedged though, it specifies *civilian* casualties, not overall. 23 dead in Winter Soldier doesn't count however many SHIELD people died, which I think fits. The CW montage of that actually shows civilians getting wasted by the waves from the crashing Helicarrier that wasn't in WS itself.
They do make a point of actually saving people and I wouldn't prefer Man of Murder death porn, but even with the wiggle room they created those are fairly low numbers for New York and Sokovia.
I'm guessing they evacuated people off-screen with the power of love.
Sokovia is the one that's hard sell, since regardless of how many evacuated to the carrier a lot should have been left in part of the city that got dropped, plus people in surrounding areas that died like Zemo's family. It should have been a few thousand dead, conservatively.
because reality is depressing, I don't want that in my capeshit. I don't want constant fucking news segments with real news channels talking about the superman and the batman, fuck you and fuck snyder and terrio, goyer for writing that nonsense.
Oh looking another fucking segment with the news talking about batman or superman! This is what I want to see constantly in my comic movie. Oh look a scene set in the fucking african jungle where superman barley saves anyone and when he does its handled like a burden or some shit, hes fucking superman!
Also fucking marvel, their movies are fucking boring. Fucking Doctor Strange blew ass, Civil War I fell asleep.
Thank fuck for John Wick 2.
Why is Op such a colossal faggot? Your first thread with this exact same topic was enough for the evening, thank you.
>Not getting the joke that there were no civilian casualties in BvS because they specifically mention the Doomsday fight is in a very large, somehow completely abandoned area of wherever they are
Nobody is offended because of their own moral beliefs when watching superhero films. What bothers people is that, in the comics, Superman and Batman have had explicit no-killing policies for decades. Most Marvel heroes don't have that.
There weren't any superheroes around on 9/11
I don't get it. Are people mad that they're saying there were casualties?
>diluting themselves against reality
I don't think you know what that word means.
The entire movie is a joke, tbqh wichu phamalamarino
in MoS it's also because Superman seems so unconcerned with the amount of destruction they're causing and you never see him make a strong effort to minimize it. this is a problem in a lot of comics and cartoons as well.
The only one that's totally unreasonable is the Battle of New York. In a completely unexpected invasion, where they make a point to show the aliens targeting civilians, it should've been way higher than that.
In The Winter Soldier that seems pretty reasonable, I presume that number is civilian + SHIELD personnel and not HYDRA operatives. If that's the case then the only huge amount of damage was the Helicarriers crashing, and considering they were manned only by HYDRA soldiers I doubt them crashing with kill too many innocents.
The final battle in Age of Ultron very specifically focuses on the heroes saving/evacuating civilians rather than fighting robots, at least at the beginning. Considering they evacuating a ton of people before the fighting even started, and then got a helicarrier's worth of people out once they were in the air, 177 seems reasonable.
There was that montage before the battle of the Avengers evacuating the place. Remember Scarlet Witch basically hypnotized a fuckton of people to get up and leave. Zemo mentions in Civil War that he and his family were heeding the warnings and going to his father's place at the edge of the city, though unfortunately it wasn't far enough to escape the falling rubble
I love how they keep hammering THE PORT IS ABANDONED or THANK GOD THIS DISTRICT IS EMPTY. Question is, how? They overcompensated after the MoS fallout and as a result its just as bad.
It's actually just civilian casualties in WS.
No number is given for SHIELD personnel or HYDRA agents.
literally can't handle death, they've been accustomed to ultimate good vs evil, black vs white. The Marvel Superheroes can't even be associated with death that's not completely accidental. Like lmao you killed a nigger with a 3.6 GPA, big fucking wop. No stakes.
They're mad that there wasn't enough casualties.
Even though they are superheroes who's sole job is to save people.
...
Christ that's in poor taste.
and he didn't even post the page with Dr Doom crying at Ground Zero page
That's because Marvel heroes actually do their job of protecting people instead of looking depressed and fighting eachother
>instead of looking depressed and fighting each other
about that...
what's worse, having Dr. Doom cry there or retcon it later to be just a doombot? it feels like they went "yeah nah, it's not worth it our depiction of this character is more important" and changed it
Remember how people were hyped that Iron Man wouldn't be able to save everyone in IM3 but then when the movie came out he did in fact save everyone in that plane scene? What a disappointing movie.
I actually like how the Avengers went out of their way to save civilians but the death count is ridiculously low and just makes the alien invaders and psychotic robots look toothless and incompetent. Like putty patrol levels of shit
You mean it's bad that superheroes save people when that's the whole reason they exist?
Geez.
There is nothing wrong with it being a Doombot. Doombots are classic.
wow you mean a kids movie doesnt have astronomical figures for their disasters
in those movies they make a point that they're protecting and evacuating civilians
in man of steel they just pancake a small town and an entire city
That reminded me of Dragon ball Z when Vegeta and Nappa crash into a bunch of buildings of a crowded city and Vegeta says "Too bad it's Sunday those buildings would be full up tomorrow" and the Nappa blows the entire city away and says "That area may have been evacuated"
Don't forget Superman and Lois making out and Lois making a joke while there were people probably dying trapped in destroyed buildings all around them.
Do people still think half of Metropolis was flattened? It was a few blocks
Imagine if the first Spiderman movie managed to come out before 9/11 and the scene where Spiderman stops a plane from crashing into the twin towers was made.
Spiderman would have literally stopped 9/11
I feel like the answer is "both"
Why wouldn't the island be abandoned? I'm not autistic so I never began to get triggered by it.