>>79493301

blah blah blah different time

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Efhd0Chhx2U
youtube.com/watch?v=814rcm4KC5w
youtube.com/watch?v=NpUKM0MFNaM
youtube.com/watch?v=h3shmfKOZ9g
youtube.com/watch?v=aMqM13EUSKw
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

IT WAS A DIFFERENT

TIME

the CGI on 9/11 was really fucking bad (almost as bad as in spuderman)

>having to use retarded Muslim hijacking planes story to hide the dustification and demolition of the WTC complex

for anyone wondering
some shit must have been in the WTC dust that toasted specific materials

Why didn't Spider-Man stop it if he saw it happen?

Spiderman could have easily stopped mossad when they were preparing the buildings

It was a different time. This sort of thing was acceptable back then

...

the dust fucked up the cars' heat sinks and air intakes causing them to overheat and catch on fire, they were then pushed off to the side of the road by workers.

>the dust fucked up the cars' heat sinks and air intakes
cars who weren't even running?
why would they burn?

>they were then pushed off to the side of the road by workers.
I think they had better to do then haul burned out cars to the FDR

>source isn't listed
you retard

>dude we're well trained agents taking part in the biggest conspiracy of modern times let's take photos of the evidence lmao
Do truthers actually believe this?

just google "toasted cars WTC"

its known that some strange shit did happen that day
like 1,2 million tons of building just turning into dust.

Buildings are mostly empty space inside user. Otherwise they wouldn't be very useful.

>buildings are 100% solid objects
>removes source from images

cars that were running catch on fire/explode
cars nearby catch on fire/explode
not everyone can be at the WTC and roads still need to be maintained.

The entire fucking island was covered in dust. Hence this classic image.

that doesn't even matter if they did pictures or not. retards eat up the official story anyway

its still 1,2 million tons of steel and other shit.
the WTC was fucking huuge and somehow all that steel shit turned to dust?
planes did this?

how would you click a link in a image?
I can give you the site where I got it from.

OH MY GOSH THAT CLOUD RESEMBLES A PLANE JUST NOTICED THIS CAN'T BE REAL ITS LIKE THE SIMPSONS AND ALL THAT SHIT THEY CANT GET AWAY WITH THIS

Looks like a pretty big pile of debris.

even cars who weren't running were affected

whatever they used to bring those towers down, shit is spooky as fuck.

why do people still try to argue with truthers?

Concrete is not as durable as you think. It can be quite easily shattered with a sledge hammer.

When metal is heated, it loses structural integrity. As it bends, it heats up, when metal heats up enough, it melts. Thus the pools of molten metal at the bottom of the wtc.

its quite easy to turn 1.2 million tons of concrete and steel into 1.2 million tons of molten metal and dust when its pulverized one floor at a time by ~300 million tons of falling metal/concrete. As the WTC was not designed to withstand having ~300 million tons of metal and concrete dropped on it.

Explain WTC7.

>cars that are nearby catch fire and explode

Its almost as if automobiles have a sizeable quantity of extremely explosive fluid within them at all times.

>enter thread expecting Raimiposting
>it's full of 9/11 conspiracyposting

see pic

No steel doesn't just turn into dust, and it was only a few floor burning.
why would the whole building turn into dust?

>When metal is heated, it loses structural integrity. As it bends, it heats up, when metal heats up enough, it melts.
But it doesn't get cut in half and make the building fall cohesively like Jenga towers.

Most images are from the side that wasn't facing the twin towers and it collapsed before the dust could clear enough to get a decent view of it. There are images that show a huge chunk of it had been utterly demolished by the collapse of the towers and the fact it stayed up as long as it did is pretty impressive.

It was burning for hours upon hours after being hit by massive amounts of debris from the collapsing north tower, how young are you?

Reminder that you guys are taking the bait.

Proof?

...

Door handles are made of plastic and gas tanks are designed to burn, not explode.

So what direction should 300 tons of steel and concrete fall? Other than, ya know, down? Straight down?

>it's an user is reposting 9/11 shit from another thread in a spiderman thread episode

Proof, you little underage shit, I'm not going to spoonfeed you. Go back and watch more infowars or whatever other echo chamber you get your 9/11 conspiracies from.

>its quite easy to turn 1.2 million tons of concrete and steel into 1.2 million tons of molten metal and dust when its pulverized one floor at a time by ~300 million tons of falling metal/concrete.
No it's not. Who the hell taught you that?

Still didn't post proof.

but what torched the cars on fire?
why was the Dust from collapsing WTC causing random fires?

Does
look like the buildings just "turned into dust?"

If the planes had crashed into the roofs of the WTC, the WTC would still be standing today.

They crashed into, the what, 70th through 80th floors? That means when the structural integrity failed after hours of burning, 200 million tons started falling on the rest of the building.

When did "truther" become an insult?

where are the other 100 floors?

>but what torched the cars on fire?
Cars that were running overheated until the gasoline in the lines ignited and exploded, generating sufficient heat for the gasoline in nearby cars to reach it's flashpoint and proceed to burn.

As has already been said.

Proof of what you little underage cunt, that the towers collapsed, that debris hit WT7? LOOK AT THE PHOTOGRAPH. How is that not clear, look at the impact from the debris and the proximity of the North tower to WT7 and understand you little shit. There's no reasoning with conspiratards like yourself.

there was no planes buddy

it was all controlled demolition and they used some very strange (still unknown) shit to destroy the towers.

How the hell does structural integrity fail at the foundation then?

around 2005 or 2006.

Basically once all arguments about the 9/11 conspiracy boiled down to a complete lack of understanding of chemistry or physics.

They were empty all along

In that massive fucking pile of rubble you autist. Holy fuck, it's almost as if the majority of the volume of the world trade centers was air, and they aren't solid objects.

Also, fyi, when superheated flaming debris falls all over the place, it can start fires you stupid autist.

why would the material start to peel?

>Cars that were running overheated
why would cars who were parked start to burn?

>there were no planes

>webm of a plane crashing into the wtc

... yes, that's what it looks like when a flying object constructed to be as light as possible that is composed primarily of empty space crashes into reinforced steel.

Oh, you're a no plane autist as well, big surprise. What do I expect from an edgy 16-year old that just discovered babbies' first conspiracy?

doesn't look like its made out of air

Exactly the same reason why people believe the Moon landings were faked.

Living in new York must have been so comfy that day

... negro every video shows the top of the buildings falling and taking the rest of the building with it.

haha who even cares if the wtc was a controlled demolition? It happened either way, get a job and stop worrying about inane bullshit loser, lmao. Invisible planes, lololololol.next you'll tell me they shoop'd the whop and rented battletoads. Get out of here you newfag

It's used to discredit anybody who even questions the official story.

when you run into a wall you melt into the wall?
cool

didn't knew that
and you also don't slow down when hitting a steel wall that is many inches thick?

woah

what doesn't make sense about the no plane theory?
actually it makes too much sense which is scary.

heat causes things to peel.

nearby fires.

Why are you making me repeat myself?

The heat from the other cars that were on fire. The dust and smoke that was in the air. And you know emergency vehicles are kept running right?

Would have made a good movie. Priests and politicians assembling their minions in all spheres for the big show, a few rogue military types smuggling their micronukes into the basements...not sure how they would cast it but Clooney for sure.

Troofer. The troof will set you free user.

>haha who even cares if the wtc was a controlled demolition?
I think its interesting to know how it was done.

it seems to be not a usual kind of burning

That sounds like truther talk to me

when 250 tons of thin aluminum crashes into reinforced steel at hundreds of miles per hour, yes, it just about melts.

>most powerful government to ever exist who has organizational capabilities beyond mainstream understanding cant get photoshop right

really made me question the official narrative

>WHY WOULD THE ENGINE OF A FIRE TRUCK BURNING CAUSE IT TO MELT

for the love of fuck dude

Don't worry child, everyone goes through an edgy 9/11 truther conspiracy phase in life, then you eventually get an education and look back and cringe at your retardation.

Here's the dumbest thing about all these retarded conspiracies, they all focus on the structural failure / no planes / other retarded bullshit. Maybe, just maybe take your head out of your ass for 5 minutes and realize that 9/11 happened exactly as me and millions of other people witnessed it. If there was a conspiracy about 9/11, it had to do with intelligence agencies / deep government allowing the attacks to happen with prior knowledge, in order to exploit the geopolitical consequences of the attacks. Not your retarded "MUH THERMITE!" with zero evidence, or your absolutely autistical "NO PLANES! MOSSAD!" garbage.

We will likely never know the actual truth. Maybe the Israelis knew and wanted to get the US to topple Iraq. Maybe it was known that the Saudis financed it, and our government covered it up in order to maintain a relationship with SA. All these retarded engineering conspiracies have no basis in evidence, and are peddled by retards, likely controlled opposition, in order to divert from the real culprits, the Saudis.

Oh, a plane animation? Hmmm. I guess people who were ON THE FUCKING GROUND IN NYC THAT DAY AND WITNESSED IT, and all the amateur photographers THAT ALSO FUCKING CAPTURED THE PLANES HITTING THE TOWER are all liars too right, all part of your autistic conspiracy? Oh, and apparently every single news agency that had cameras pointed at the WTC after the first plane hit were also ALL PART OF THE CONSPIRACY TOO, right?

Take a step back, realize what a retarded sperg you are, and pull that head out of your rectum.

fun fact: a 767 couldn't fly as fast as in the shopped videos that were released and broadcasted live

why would cars who weren't running randomly start burning?
why were some cars lying upside down?

they only had one take, no wonder they fucked it up.

only people reporting planes hitting were (((CNN))) employees, we all know how reliable their infos are.
lol

But that's the exact opposite. Objective investigation kept being denied even though roughly 13,500 engineers and architects were immediately petitioning for independent verification. Hell, even the National Institute of Standards and Technology were forbidden to a complete investigation.

See, this is why people don't believe conspiracy theories like this. Schizos and aspies go out of their to make up bullshit like "THERE WAS NO PLANES!!1!" and end up making their theories more retarded than they already are.

You guys have to remember that admitting fault in oneself is extremely hard for some people to do, to the point where they will just repeat the same debunked fallacies over and over.

Dust caused the truck to over heat and mixed the with the heat of the surrounding fires it makes sense it would """""wilt"""""

Watch September Clues, then tell us you don't believe it.

so 1400 just overheated? even cars that weren't running?

there was a huge parking lot near the WTC, all cars started burning for no reason besides getting hit by the dust.

>Engineers and architects

aka, retards. Why is it that it's always fucking Engineers that get drawn into wacko conspiracy garbage?

Literally NOT AN ARGUMENT.

It's just edgy children. I remember when I was 16 back in 2005 I was really big into 9/11 conspiracies and constantly blabbed on about it in front of my family like an edgelord due to loose change. OPEN UR EYES SHEEPLE and all, it's really embarrassing to remember.

If a tree falls and no one hears it does it make a sound
Not to you

>I DON'T HAVE TO PROVE THE PLANES WERE HOLOGRAMS, WATCH THIS INSTEAD!

>even cars that weren't running?
Yes. The surrounding heat from other fires and the fact that cars have highly flammable materials in them.

When the WTC falls does it make an earthquake?
apparently not

>It's just edgy children.
For the post part it is, but there are some who never grow out of that phase. Being able to connect with like-minded people via the internet where they just echo-chamber their way through delusion seems to just makes things worse as well.

Technically it wouldn't because sound is our brain's interpretations of certain vibrations in the air vibrating at different frequencies, as caught by our ears.

So no, if a tree falls in the forest and no one is around to hear it, it doesn't make a sound.

If you weren't an autist you would know that there's hundreds of amateur videos of 9/11 on the Internet.
youtube.com/watch?v=Efhd0Chhx2U
youtube.com/watch?v=814rcm4KC5w
youtube.com/watch?v=NpUKM0MFNaM
youtube.com/watch?v=h3shmfKOZ9g

>MUH CGI

Arguing with people like yourself is completely pointless.

I still have yet to see a Raimi 9/11 get

>plane is different in every video

jup its CGI

fucking KILL YOURSELF

Normally I shy away from the underage "kys" comments, but in this guy's case, I agree. Suicide is probably the best option to cure his retardation.

why do you shills always get so insulted?

can someone please prove this post's text isn't CGI?

>yfw you fell for early 2000s CGI and thought it was real

Since it is text created by the web browser which is a program running on a computer, it is "computer generated imagery".

>Events captured from different angles and distances have different shades of lighting
Really makes you think.

really?
never saw a plane in the early morning turn Black

l don't get how truthers don't understand what happened

some people stole a couple planes and flew them into some buildings, its not all that complicated

its waaay more complicated than just that.

>How could the plane squish like that?

Allow me to introduce you to basic physics. This is a solid golf ball hitting steel at half the speed of the plane. The plane was mostly air and was going twice as fast so if anything it would squish more in that 1/4 second

youtube.com/watch?v=aMqM13EUSKw

Whoa it's almost like the towers shadow is being cast on it

planes are not solid golfballs

that's a BLACKED plane

stop being racist