The population growth of Africa

This is terrifying. Imagine how many will try to get into Europe in the future.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_authoritarian_regimes_supported_by_the_Soviet_Union_or_Russia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walls_of_Benin
twitter.com/AnonBabble

who cares you will be dead at that time

these graphs are fucking retarded
they don't account for the fact that population growth slows down once development increases

its all fault of european colonialism and american policy of fucking up countries while europe is silent and lets those people in. we saw it in middle east imagine how will it be in africa if noone stops it

>american policy of fucking up countries
t. Vladimir Putin
Russia did just as much, if not more than us.
We at least improved the economies of the countries we fucked with

>. Imagine how many will try to get into Europe in the future
so what?

africa was a poor shithole before european colonialism, you know.

>africa
>development

>ancient egypt
>empire of mali
>zanziber
>etc

THE ERA OF THE MELANIN KANGZ IS UPON US

Africa IS developing. If you care about facts you'll acknowledge this.

Africa has a economic development of 5.4$, as well as immense levels of development in stability, social issues, HDI, life expectancy, and a whole host of others.

Africa will likely be on par with somewhere like Serbia in 2100 at worst, and Poland at best.

you're a retard
not gonna even argue with a post that dumb i just hope you're trolling
yes, thats why they had low population. when colonialists left they left behind infrastructure but allowed those countries to go to chaos and shit while helping them to breed uncontrolably. look at rhodesia and south africa

>arabs and meme 'empires'

how is it the fault of the european colonialists? that's like british people blaming the EU for their country going to shit after they left the union.

Is that it? They're all meh too. Except Egypt, which isn't nigger

>you're a retard
>not gonna even argue with a post that dumb i just hope you're trolling
Hmm???

Algeria
Angola
Azerbaijan
Belarus
Burundi
Cambodia
China
Cuba
Egypt
Eritrea
Iran
Kazakhastan
Laos
North Korea
South Sudan
Sudan
Syria
Tajikistan
Turkmenistan
Uganda
Vietnam
Uzbekistan
Zimbabwe
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Benin
Burkina Faso
Czechia
East Germany
UAE
Ethiopia
Georgia
Grenada
Nicaragua
Guinea-Bissau
Indonesia
Iraq
Libya
Burma
Nigeria
Peru
Poland
Romania
Somalia
Hungary
Yugoslavia
Bulgaria
Mongolia

Their filthy tendrils were every where.

Do you not know what "etc" means?
Anyways, there are plenty others. Benin Empire comes to mind.
They had a set of walls, while the walls themself were'nt impressive, the feat of actually building them in many ways surpasses the pyramids, or Great Wall of China.
Just look up Walls of Benin if you don't believe me, to lazy to link it.

>romania

whoops
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_authoritarian_regimes_supported_by_the_Soviet_Union_or_Russia

>They extend for some 160 km in all, in a mosaic of more than 500 interconnected settlement boundaries. They cover 2,510 sq. miles (6,500 square kilometres) and were all dug by the Edo people. In all, they are four times longer than the Great Wall of China, and consumed a hundred times more material than the Great Pyramid of Cheops. They took an estimated 150 million hours of digging to construct, and are perhaps the largest single archaeological phenomenon on the planet.[4]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walls_of_Benin

because they knew whats gonna happen, niggs gonna nigg. they didnt care because they were short-sighted and were just interested in further exploitation of resources. there's a good italian documentary called "africa addio" back from that era and gives a good explaination on african problem with post-colonialism

Europe will be diverse

It's the convergence. Africans don't even have to try that hard, that's the advantage non developed countries have. They can just mimic the policies the developed world took centuries to perfect, and accomplish it in a few decades.
Sure, you can argue that their corrupt leaders and politicians and warlords would sabotage it to gain a little extra power and money, but even they could end up getting a way better quality of life by bringing their countries to the 21st century than they could get by being corrupt fucks.
Not only that, the EU and other developed regions are aware that this is a real possibility, so everyone, from Africans to Euros to Asians to Americans have an interest in Africa getting its shit together.

Why not show a graph of population growth of Europe in 19th century? Everyone was breeding like animals back then and that was the reason Europe had so much population to begin with.

more than half of those countries recieved help from russia which actually helped them.
you on the other hand "helped" by bombing them and also installing shitty murderous regimes and continue doing it to this day. the big difference is you always portrayed yourself as leader of "free" world, promotor of human rights and democracy(which is all bullshit btw) while crying russia is bad they just want to control everything they are evil blah blah blah while being the worse option

...

The UN population esimates take into account development and the standard fall in birthrates.

Excess population growth is why the vikings pillaged and raped continental Europe and Britain for 400 years.

2 and 2 together. I hope you're militarizing the Mediterranean. If you're not, you guys are fucking retarded.

>they don't account for the fact
Prove that it doesn't.

What a shit graph, completely diminishes the effect how small European Population surpassed the most crowded continent in such short time.

And not every African country has 7-8 children average. Relatively developed ones have 3-4 average which is good for healthy development of society without dying out.

>mfw America will be whiter than Europe after 1 billion niggers cross the Mediterranean

>in such a short time
Both of them exploded, Europe got a 50 year head start thanks to colonialism and discovery of the potato/maize/etc. (as well as improved natal medicine)

what policies?
there is not a magic policy to become developed
there is no blueprint. they wont make it because ultimately they need to change their every behaviour... the culture itself must be geared towards it. becoming developed is not so easy that economic growth will make it happen

This. It is such a basic math that I doubt that people who did these projections forgot to account for it.

It will plateau as conditions improve there

So did USA not help West Europe?
Did USA not help Japan and South Korea?