The ROMAN man is the epitome of male dominance and masculinity

The ROMAN man is the epitome of male dominance and masculinity.

Let's start by looking at his body. His body is large. His domineering size makes his presence known without him even needing to point himself out. He is muscular, as a result of his high levels of testosterone. This gives him the appearance of health and strength. He is then covered by his olive skin. This olive skin reminds us of his ruggedness, a feature that developed due to being exposed to the temperate climates of the mediterranean, made to withstand such an extreme condition. It also has a psychological effect on the observer. The olive skin reminds us of our dark, deep desires that emerge from our primal subconscious past.

The ROMAN man's demeanor is one of alphaness. He is dominant, assertive, and can be explosively aggressive. His behaviour strikes fear into the more timid, cowardly races of man(barbarians dogs)

The summit of expression of his masculinity on his body is his penis. The ROMAN penis is largest of all the races. As the penis is the penultimate symbol of manhood, this alone would suffice to make the ROMAN man the most masculine of men. This large penis is able fulfill the desire of the neediest of women, being able to more than fill all the recesses of the vagina. Its length ensures that when it ejaculates, the potent roman seed will immediately enter the womb of the woman the ROMAN man impregnates.

In total, the ROMAN man expresses this masculinity in a most exemplary manner in bed. When he fucks, he unleashes the entirety of his lusts and desires upon his partner without any restraint.

All this is the reason why the ROMAN man is the epitome of masculinity.

Other urls found in this thread:

classics.mit.edu/Caesar/gallic.2.2.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Weren't we like a head taller?

Mediterranean masterrace

Too bad Rome is dead. Now we have Turk and Arab bull to make up for it. Whitey BTFO.

germanics were manlets in those times

Julius Caesar notes an instance during the The Gallic Wars of Romans being mocked by the Gauls for being short.

"And on the first arrival of our army they made frequent sallies from the town, and contended with our men in trifling skirmishes; afterward, when hemmed in by a rampart of twelve feet [in height], and fifteen miles in circuit, they kept themselves within the town. When, vineae having been brought up and a mound raised, they observed that a tower also was being built at a distance, they at first began to mock the Romans from their wall, and to taunt them with the following speeches. "For what purpose was so vast a machine constructed at so great a distance? With what hands," or "with what strength did they, especially [as they were] men of such very small stature" (for our shortness of stature, in comparison to the great size of their bodies, is generally a subject of much contempt to the men of Gaul) "trust to place against their walls a tower of such great weight." classics.mit.edu/Caesar/gallic.2.2.html

WE

t.poojeet

ayo heard u be sayin some sheeit latin boi

Lanklets, when will they learn?

actually romans were quite small

Roman historian Ammianus Marcellinus recalls his study of the Sarmatian tribes (ancestors of Poles)
>Nearly all the Alani are men of great stature and beauty, their hair is somewhat yellow, their eyes are frighteningly fierce

Study of skeletons suggests that Sarmatians were on average 1.70–1.80 tall.
So imagine how tiny an average Roman had to be to consider 175cm tall a "great stature"

Roman warriors pissed their skirts at the sight of female Sarmatian warrior.

>Roman warriors pissed their skirts at the sight of female Sarmatian warrior.
more like jizzed their pants before taking them as slaves

You mean kind of like how modern day Italians are smaller than modern day Ukranians?

t. laziale terrone che larpa come romano perché la sua vita fa CAGARE AL CAZZO

>tfw mainly of italian descent and look just like that

But is he cute? No, he is not. Japan is the epitome of male masculinity. Pic related

Doesn't necessarily mean the average Roman was shorter than the average Gaul. Unlike most other armies in the ancient world the Romans preferred to recruit short men as they made the problem of feeding the army somewhat more manageable

Romans were faggots

wow

Pretty much the opposite of the truth. You sure know your ancient history

t. closet faggot