Based Bill

>#consforshillary
Nice try schlomo. But regardless, she has a tenuous grasp on conservative principles, it's cringe worthy watching her shill for the network.

>longest period without a major hurricane (cat 3+) in recorded history
>since 2005 and going strong
>like 3 years after the scientists in an inconvenient truth said global warming would increase the FREQUENCY and SEVERITY of hurricanes.
>"scientists" dont want you to know that they actually cant predict shit

cnsnews.com/news/article/kathleen-brown/noaa-says-its-record-no-major-hurricane-has-struck-us-mainland-10-years

>Ideological stake

Fuck science I guess.

What if it isn't possible to adapt to these changes? Even if it is a slow and steady decline, the measures that need to be taken will most likely be extreme. At the very least, shouldn't we accept that Earth cannot suffer so many people to live on it long-term? Shouldn't we return to looking to the stars and exploring space?

>#consforshillary
Where did I imply that I would ever support Hilllary fucking Clinton? I appreciate you trying to shoehorn my politics into your narrow, monochromatic view of the American political landscape, but it's not exactly as the shitposters would have you believe.

>science tells you anything about what ought to be valued
A fucking leaf.

>be concerned about the health of the planet
>think humans are destroying the earth
>become climate scientist

every single climate "scientist" is an activist at heart. they are only in science because they want to convince people that the planet needs saving. they're not in science because they grew up loving to learn how shit worked or wanted to make new discoveries. they're in science to achieve their political objectives.

Bill (((Nye))) the "Bachelor's Degree In Mechanical Engineering" Guy

The problem is the entire argument about CO2 is based on a faulty computer model. A study from 2000 to 2011 showed that CO2 was escaping at a much higher rate than predicted by computer models (which basically allowed for little to no escape, by factoring that the rate of escape was constant). This revelation lead to a study in 2013 which found very strong correlation between the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere and the rate of it's escape.

In other words, the greater the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, the more quickly it is pushed into space. Also, keep in mind that during the Jurassic Period there was 5 times the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere.

>Via critical thinking

Do you really expect ANY Sup Forumslack to be able to understand science at that degree? NASA publishes results based on instruments that have costed billions. How is your "critical thinking" going to challenge that?

You really have to be mentally retarded to not see that the PPM of CO2 in the atmosphere is growing and that many scientific experiences have shown so. Climate change-deniers are way worse than anti-vacciners.

>science tells you anything about what ought to be valued
>A fucking leaf.

Please tell me you're joking, this can't be real