Why are east asians sooooooo smart?

why are east asians sooooooo smart?

Other urls found in this thread:

imf.org/external/datamapper/NGDPDPC@WEO/OEMDC/ADVEC/WEOWORLD
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

autism

why are brazilians so fucking stupid?

wanna fuck my sister?

>IQ
>smart

>Why aren't European smart?

ftfy

.

This makes NO SENSE whatsoever.

If the asian are so smar why China is a monstrosity of shit hole?

If japanese are so smart why they got nuked?

If Koreans are so smart why they are at war for 200 years and ask for aid to be able to survive?

This is retarded. If your people are so smart, why do you work like a slave?
Why there is slavery in China nowadays?
Why asians eat insects as food?
Why Japanese people are extremely "A-Sexual"?

If your people are so smart, why they didnt take over the world?

If med people are so retarded, why they are literally taking over Europe right now?

Japs try hard to appear smart, but by the end of the day they work more than a slave. Tell me, why would you have to work if you are so smart?

shut the fuck up ,monkey

They are "smart" but is like being fake smart.
They spend majority of the time with practice and how can be better in any way, see videos of how child's and students of Singapore are literally slaves of the school. Just for the country and all in Asia is like that. Just see the Chinese kids how are literally killed in the practice of the Olympic Games.
Japanese students are very depressed.
Koreans are killed themselves every fucking day.
No love in Asia.

Ice age

this

>If med people are so retarded, why they are literally taking over Europe right now?

wh*Toids are too beta to stop the invasion and their women love our melanin enriched cocks

>If the asian are so smar why China is a monstrosity of shit hole?
Communism and being collectivist to the point of absurdity.

Highly g-loaded IQ-tests are a great proxy for general intelligence. IQ-denialism is a brainlet's psychological defense mechanism against the crushing feeling of inferiority.

This doesn't work for asians because it reflects their raw testing abilities instead of actual intelligence. Asians study so much that it's the often the #1 cause of suicide because it's that intense. They're pretty much soulless robots

Whenever an American or European wins an Olympic gold medal, we cheer them as heroes. When a Chinese does, the first reflex seems to be that they must have been doping; or if that’s taking it too far, that it must have been the result of inhumane training.

There seem to be parallels to this in education. Only hours after results from the latest PISA assessment showed Shanghai’s school system leading the field, Time magazine concluded the Chinese must have been cheating. They didn’t bother to read the PISA technical report, which shows there was no cheating, whatsoever, involved. Nor did they speak with the experts who had drawn the samples or with the international auditors who had carefully reviewed and validated the sample for Shanghai and those of other countries.

Others were quick to suggest that resident internal migrants might not be covered by Shanghai’s PISA sample, because years ago those migrants wouldn’t have had access to Shanghai’s schools. But, like many things in China, that has long changed and, as described by PISA, resident migrants were covered by the PISA samples in exactly the way they are covered in other countries and education systems. Still, it seems to be easier to cling to old stereotypes than keep up with changes on the ground (or to read the PISA report).

True, like other emerging economies, Shanghai is still building its education system and not every 15-year-old makes it yet to high school. As a result of this and other factors, the PISA 2012 sample covers only 79% of the 15-year-olds in Shanghai. But that is far from unique. Even the United States, the country with the longest track record of universal high-school education, covered less than 90% of its 15-year-olds in PISA – and it didn’t include Puerto Rico in its PISA sample, a territory that is unlikely to have pulled up US average performance.

International comparisons are never easy and they are never perfect. But anyone who takes a serious look at the facts and figures will concede that the samples used for PISA result in robust and internationally comparable data. They have been carefully designed and validated to be fit for purpose in collaboration with the World’s leading experts, and the tests are administered under strict and internationally comparable conditions. Anyone who really wants to find out can review the underlying data.

Short of arguments about methodology, some people turn to dismissing Shanghai’s strong performance by saying that Shanghai’s students are only good on the kind of tasks that are easy to teach and easy to test, and that those things are losing in relevance because they are also the kind of things that are easy to digitise, automate and outsource. But while the latter is true, the former is not. Consider this: Only 2% of American 15-year-olds and 3% of European ones reach the highest level of math performance in PISA, demonstrating that they can conceptualise, generalise and use math based on their investigations and apply their knowledge in novel contexts. In Shanghai it is over 30%. Educators in Shanghai have simply understood that the world economy will pay an ever-rising premium on excellence and no longer value people for what they know, but for what they can do with what they know.

PISA didn’t just test what 15-year-olds know in maths, it also asked them what they believe makes them succeed. In many countries, students were quick to blame everyone but themselves: More than three-quarters of the students in France, an average performer on the PISA test, said the course material was simply too hard, two-thirds said the teacher did not get students interested in the material, and half said their teacher did not explain the concepts well or they were just unlucky. The results are very different for Shanghai. Students there believe they will succeed if they try hard and they trust their teachers to help them succeed. That tells us a lot about school education. And guess which of these two countries keeps improving and which is not? The fact that students in some countries consistently believe that achievement is mainly a product of hard work, rather than inherited intelligence, suggests that education and its social context can make a difference in instilling the values that foster success in education.

And even those who claim that the relative standing of countries in PISA mainly reflects social and cultural factors must concede that educational improvement is possible: In mathematics, countries like Brazil, Turkey, Mexico or Tunisia rose from the bottom; Italy, Portugal and the Russian Federation have advanced to the average of the industrialised world or close to it; Germany and Poland rose from average to good, and Shanghai and Singapore have moved from good to great. Indeed, of the 65 participating countries, 45 saw improvement in at least one subject area. These countries didn’t change their culture, or the composition of their population, nor did they fire their teachers. They changed their educational policies and practices. Learning from these countries should be our focus. We will be cheating ourselves and the children in our schools if we miss that chance.

International comparisons are never easy and they aren’t perfect. But PISA shows what is possible in education, it takes away excuses from those who are complacent, and it helps countries see themselves in the mirror of the educational results and educational opportunities delivered by the world’s educational leaders. The world has become indifferent to tradition and past reputations, unforgiving of frailty and ignorant of custom or practice. Success will go to those individuals, institutions and countries which are swift to adapt, slow to complain and open to change. And the task for governments is to help citizens rise to this challenge. PISA can help to make that happen.

>They spend majority of the time with practice and how can be better in any way, see videos of how child's and students of Singapore are literally slaves of the school. Just for the country and all in Asia is like that

...

...

...

>there are people on Sup Forums who STILL reply to this spammer's lame threads that rehash lame memes again and again like a bot

>Japanese students are very depressed.

IQ is a weak system, why anybody still care about?

t. brainlet

>Koreans are killed themselves every fucking day.
>Asians study so much that it's the often the #1 cause of suicide because it's that intense. They're pretty much soulless robots

>No love in Asia.

No u.
The Ruski is correct

>>Cites IQ scores fabricated by white supremacist organization

Really helping your case.

Still not white, btw.

typical excuse

>This makes NO SENSE whatsoever.
Of course it doesn't

...

GDP per capita, current prices
U.S. dollars per capita

Macao 79.56 thousand
Norway 73.62 thousand

Singapore 53.88 thousand
Sweden 53.25 thousand

Finland 45.69 thousand
Hong Kong 45 thousand

United Kingdom 38.85 thousand
Japan 38.55 thousand

South Korea 29.73 thousand
Spain 28.21 thousand

Taiwan 24.23 thousand
Portugal 20.58 thousand

China 8.58 thousand
Bulgaria 7.92 thousand

imf.org/external/datamapper/NGDPDPC@WEO/OEMDC/ADVEC/WEOWORLD

no niggers
no whites

and somehow, countries like britain have contributed tenfolds more to the world than the entirety of eastern asia combined

Citation needed.