Is there a bigger waste of resources in film and TV than fake nudity? This includes body doubles, CGI nudity...

Is there a bigger waste of resources in film and TV than fake nudity? This includes body doubles, CGI nudity, prosthetics, etc.

What a dumb thing to accommodate and spend money on.

apparently it's important to get big names to play roles

I'm sure there are always similarly big names who aren't so up their own ass.

idk i think part of a woman's value in hollywood is not having had her body exposed. see jennifer lawrence.

I never got this with her, shes done a dozen photoshoots where she's in a string bikini and yet in this she's wearing granny panties.. why? They could have cg'd off 1/10th of the fabric for something she's williningly done 100 times. I don't get it.

Celebrities are zoo animals. Do they still do this?

I can understand why man wouldn't want to everyone see how small your dick is, but for women everyone already have an idea of how beautiful or ugly your body is.

They do it more now than they ever did before.

It's math.

People are cast in movies based on profitability, what kind of draw they are in the box office.

The expense of computer generated effects against the projected contribution towards profits a certain actress' casting may provide justify the expense for the studio.

Not with certainty.

The mystery of having not seen that woman makes you idealized her.

Knowing the reality stops that.

Then why have nudity in the first place?

It's also a draw.

Some actresses don't rely on that mystery, they got talent, looks or otherwise.

Reddit spaceing, but this. I am way happier if an actress doesn't show her body

how else are they going to attract the "dude maybe she'll get nude this time" audience?

Showing cock is alot different than showing a girls tits though. You see vag about as often as you see dick, which isn't that often.

It's easy.

If you don't want to do nudity.

Don't sign up for a role that includes it

it allows actors with intelligence and self respect to play roles they otherwise would not have been able to play, how is that a waste of money?

...

How am I trolling? Fake nudity means you get to hire an actual actor/your first choice instead of a pathetic prostitute with no values or sense of privacy. It's clearly a high return on a very small investment, not a waste of money. You must be mentally retarded.

They can also just write out the nudity or use fakes since nudity in a movie is literally of zero importance and is only used to bait in desperate neckbeards who somehow never learned about Internet porn.

You are really warped.

I read that Jessica Alba promised her grandma she would never do a nude scene, so that's why she faked hers.

>body doubles, CGI nudity, prosthetics
examples? what's the difference?

This all the way.

she had to do nudity on sin city, she have already signed the papers and she had to be naked for the move sin city, as a striper! but what the director do? its ok no nudity.

Because the actress doesn't want to be on the set naked in front of a lot of people who aren't complete strangers and who she'll have to continue working with. She doesn't care about what ends up in the movie because it's "arty" or "shot respectfully" or whatever is used to justify it, also she gets paid a lot of money. What she does care about it Carlos the lighting guy ogling her tits for the multiple takes they have to do.

The studio decides that the expense of digitizing the nudity is worth the draw of the actress. They also know that normies who don't know about this technology will be more drawn to seeing [famous actress] get naked.

It's fake and diminishes the character as a whole.

Then don't sign up for a role that has nudity.

>fake dog poop in john wick
>5k

Can we get some egregious examples? I never notice these.

Something you might like, but Marky marks cock in that porn movie he did was fake.

Olivia Wilde in one of her comedies
That chick in Game of Thrones.
The dick in Irreversible
Sin City 2
Jessica Alba a bunch of times
etc

Willem Dafoe could've handled that role without the prosthetic just fine.

Too ugly.

Which chick in GoT? If you mean Lena Headey, it's cos she was pregnant at the time.

In Supernova, they digitally darkened Robin Tunney's nude scene and passed it off as Angela Bassett.

I think the 300 sequel too?

>I don't understand the basics of negotiation
100% confirmed for autist

$500,000 to show tits for no reason to the story

Explain further

Teasing makes sexuality more fun. As long as a hot famous woman hasn't shown everything, guys will be tantalized by the tease, and will continue to be sexually invested. There are tons of Instagram chicks and Asian JAV-types who spend years variously revealing every possible part of their breasts except the nipples... and guys keep coming back for the next tease.

...

prude bitch

>Dosen't like appearing nude
>Takes photos and video nude anyway

>ITT: OP wants to show us his dick

no not that one

>missing out on the acting of Jessica Alba

...

>acting

its great for my dick

wut

It's a decent compromise if they'd never get nude otherwise

Not really

Nope. That's akin to reading fanfics and treating it as anything but.

>CGI nudity
No way is this a thing.

>Beowulf nude Angie Jolie

Maybe that sort of shit is something you're familiar with

Actually extremely common now

what movie/ movies

The reason here was marketing.
They explicitly marketed this movie as the one where Halle Berry finally shows her tits.

Not my personal opinion, just figured that's what he meant. For me it's semi-convincing porn parodies

Hannibal TV series, all 3 seasons.

Righto. I agree with ya

But she did that monsters ball movie where she did a nude sex scene. Or was that after?

You know they had to CGI the "angels" afterwards to make the butt cracks less promine, right?

She won an oscar for that role in Monsters ball.

Swordfish was half a year before Monsters ball.

>right?!?

Okay

haha imagine if he did post it. That'd be crazy haha

>wrong!

i never go for those xxx parodies but that is done pretty darn well

Depends on the studio. More often than not, it's a fail.

>see jennifer lawrence

Oh yeah, we saw.

It's very hit and miss, but they struck gold on this one. The casting for Dana is perfect and it pleases my dick immensely

As good as Velma in that Scooby Doo one?

Watch it yourself faggot.

The only thing I can remember about the Scooby Doo one was that it was hilarious

Basic Instinct is so good, I just remembered how good it was. I wish Sharon Stone could have stayed hot forever.

>get hundred million dollars to play pretend on camera
>won't even get naked so have to spend another hundred million on cgi
film industry crash when?

>implying any actress or woman, is worth 100mil to get nude

dafuq

it's not the 1990s anymore, people already know before the movie even hits theaters thanks to our chinese bootleg friends and the internet

>It's okay to show impaled corpses, peeled skin and decomposing bodies, but for the love of god don't show any nudity

because fuck women

To be fair i'd definitely use that as a bargaining chip.
> Pay me an extra 20% of the CGI cost / Body Doubles wage and i'll do it.

Also i guess there's the consideration of opportunity costs for future loss of income that may or may not be incurred by appearing naked, or the value you might lose later on a bigger budgeted movie that requires nudity you can do the above to.

>Also i guess there's the consideration of opportunity costs for future loss of income that may or may not be incurred by appearing naked, or the value you might lose later on a bigger budgeted movie that requires nudity you can do the above to.
hmm, that's something interesting to consider.