What the FUCK is his problem?

what the FUCK is his problem?

nothing.

He forms his own opinions on things.

Right or wrong he thinks for himself, what's your problem?

he has too much brain power for the race god gave him

he has good taste

From the thumbnail I thought he was getting a haircut and the sheet they put on him just happened to be orange.

He's the opposite man.

>Gay
>Black
>Trump supporter

What's his endgame?

At a certain point his reputation as a "contrarian" became a bit of a self fulfilling prophecy, where it seems some of his reviews tend towards being purposefully oblique and subversive more as a fuck-you to the reader than a legitimate effort at critique. Still though, we need Armond because at his best he's tearing down false idols and at his worst he's still keeping us on our toes.

2accurate2competent

He's patrish and doesn't accept bribes from (((((((((((Disney))))))))))

>Good taste in television & film
>Posts honest opinions
>Dresses nicely

Nothing.

uncle ruckus

>like things he likes
>dislike things he dislikes
>but almost everything he likes or dislikes are the opposite of what most people likes and dislikes
Yeah, what is his problem???

I tought that was Suge Knight

It's pretty telling that most of the time people's complaints about him being a contrarian is followed by a list of childrens' movies that he didn't like, such as Marvelshit.

From the few reviews i 've glanced he suffers from the journalist disease: pointless narcissistic TL;DRs. I damn those editors that reject a journalist's first novel

Ebert is the reference point for film critique

>actually not wrong

he hates being black

He's not the problem, every other critic is.

I raff

too many crackers liking shitty movies, user.