/ausnz/

*munch*

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ais_kacang
youtube.com/watch?v=pUUQXedtfwo
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

*fixes the Balkans*

>naming convention
Yep that's about it, names are only names otherwise why "Romania" should exist?
Even "Russia" take its name from a viking settlement

what happend in the other thread?

What don't I mind using a vague term for?

Chitose poster called me annoying and the Russian agreed

A-are you irritated by me sometimes desu? I can kind of tell

Where did you want to leave?
Canada seems alright

I suddenly had the urge to have a sexual inter course with a qt short hair girl with glasses.

>girl
get a load of this

Me too ;_;

why should i be irritated?

Come to the new thread

Is there really a lack of traps in Italy?

I mean sometimes

I t-think i'm just too self-conscious that I don't get many (You)s

Thoughts on this """""""food""""""""

I think so but I live in a small city
I only heard and saw the fb of someone that is a trap in a near city
But aside of that yeah
We don't have many SJW like germanic nation have though

Give me your steam (or similiar) desu :3

i know that's ramen but it looks like this dessert which I like

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ais_kacang

youtube.com/watch?v=pUUQXedtfwo

Disregard the voice.
This is how it started for me.

H-how much do yoy eat Japan user?

maybe sometime later

do you need to keep it open for notifications?

Canada is just US lite, and I don't live there anyway. Only ignorant or delusional people would want to live in the US (most of the citizens are both).

>I use the term SJW

Ah it's like Kakigoori かき氷 right?
3000kcal or something? Not obese in the slightest tho

Autist

Everyone understands what kind of people you're talking about when you use the term, so it's very useful.

Y-yes I come back later
See you :3

You wanna back that up with some proof?

Pretty much exactly except ice kacang can have azuki beans and stuff on it

>words are understood by people to have meaning
astute observation

>mutts flood the general and start fighting

You're here aren't you

>astute observation
A lot of the critisism I've heard in regards to the term amounts to ''It's a strawman'' or ''what's wrong with social justice'', but it has a useful purpose, which is why I'm confused as to why you don't like the word.

Do you consider yourself a social justice warrior yet find the term to be offensive?

>Do you consider yourself a social justice warrior yet find the term to be offensive?
No but you're a Nazi so you'll probably say I'm one.
I dislike the term due to the calibre of people who tend to use it.

Evenmods hate anime faggots. You are fucking pathetic. Ignore any general made by anime posters and their lewd anime girls, guys. Together we can make a different.

if only the mods hated bad english as much
we'd get rid of most s*Ngaporean and m*Laysian posters

>nazi
I'm more of a fascist than a national socialist desu. I adore militarism, national destiny and traps. I don't want to put anyone in a death camp.
>I dislike the term due to the calibre of people who tend to use it.
It's a fairly mainstream word, especially among young men. But I guess sweeping generalizations about ones character based on superficial things isn't unique to the Nazis.

>I'm a fascist
Good luck getting any boys to fuck then.
>especially among young men
Young men who have cheeto crubs on their double chin.

>Good luck getting any boys to fuck then.
Thank you. I wish you good luck as well.
>Young men who have cheeto crubs on their double chin.
I honestly didn't know that an awareness of intersectionality and bowing to the whims of outrage-of-the-day-teens on tumblr was a necessity to a traps heart.

Women aren't that picky, hell, they'll date serial killers and shit.

what the fuck is the point of this thread
not a single cunt or kiwi

As demonstrated, the fascist can only think in black and white.

I enjoy it when people can't see the glas house they're throwing rocks in.

Because you're so nuanced, right?
>Young men who have cheeto crubs on their double chin.
When you can't see anything in gray, you often think others are just like you.

I've experienced these people before. Maybe in Sweden it's different.

Then where did you want to move?

I will watch this video later, I'm quite commited now...

For the record, I'm one of the most right-leaning people I'm acquainted with

But you have to see the irony behind saying things like
>Young men who have cheeto crubs on their double chin.
where you make assumptions about an entire group of people (seeing things in black and white) while accusing me of doing the same thing.

I'm sure you have experienced them plenty of times, but do you not think that I've experienced the stereotypical SJW as well? Countless of times - I am Swedish after all.

I might lack your perspective, but you sure as hell lack mine as well.

Hah, do it. It's always chocking the first time you see it.

>making assumptions is black and white
Nope.
1) I'm not making an assumption, I'm basing off personal experience.
2) Seeing things in black and white describes making a false dichotomy, not an assumption.
>do you not think that I've experienced the stereotypical SJW as well? Countless of times - I am Swedish after all.
I live in Asian California. Most girls see me as an extremist.

Apocalypse Now
Die Walkuere

>Basing it off person experience
You have no way to prove that the majority of people who use the term are fat neckbeards with cheeto dust on their double chin, that's an assumption you're making BASED on your personal experience.

When I do that, you call me out on it like you're triumphant while you don't hold yourself to the same standards you hold me to.

Getting philosophical are we? I'm an idealist and a solipsist so that's a perfectly logical route to me.

Also where have you said anything based on your experience, with me calling you out on it?

Philisophical? I think it's pretty clear you are making assumptions (even though you claim you're not
>1) I'm not making an assumption, I'm basing off personal experience.
Your personal experience is not credible evidence, which means you're making assumptions.
To be quite frank, this sentence baffles me completely - as judging anything from personal experience is at best anecdotal evidence - and in your case pure assumption.

>Your personal experience is not credible evidence
On the contrary. My personal experience is the only evidence I have, until I have observed other evidence.
This is where it's philosophical.

>why yes, anecdotal evidence does not constitute proper evidence
why do materialists do this

I thought you meant that I judge everyone to the left of me to be SJW after this post
As I understood it, you're thinking that I believe that ''you're either for or against me'', as in a black and white world view.

And then you went on to talk about how you had personally experienced ''these people'' just like I feel that I've experienced what SJWs are all like.

That's because you started spouting rubbish about tumblr after I implied I didn't like fascism

>And then you went on to talk about how you had personally experienced ''these people'' just like I feel that I've experienced what SJWs are all like.
And literally what is the problem here?
You don't like these "SJWs", I don't like them either. But I don't like the people who publicised the term as well.

>During the Gamergate controversy, the negative connotation gained increased use, and was particularly aimed at those espousing views adhering to social liberalism, cultural inclusiveness, or feminism, as well as views deemed to be politically correct.

>why do materialists do this
Because if you try to open five locked doors, only to go on that all doors in the world are locked you've lost grasp on reality. What you're doing is not much different.
Which still means you're making assumptions based on your anecdotal evidence.
Is that really the standard you hold youself to?

In the end, you want to be able to make sweeping generalisations of people and that's fine. The problem is that you don't like it when other people do it, based on your ''YOU SEE EVERYTHING IN BLACK AND WHITE''.

>you've lost grasp on reality
Your dum dum realist view of reality perhaps

>Is that really the standard you hold youself to?
Yes, why?

>In the end, you want to be able to make sweeping generalisations of people and that's fine. The problem is that you don't like it when other people do it, based on your ''YOU SEE EVERYTHING IN BLACK AND WHITE''.
When did I not like anyone doing it?
I hate those far left types too.

And you don't think
>muh fat cheetos betas
is rubbish as well?

>sjws
So what would you rather we call them?
Regressives? That's too vague, regress to what exactly? Feminazis? That's even more of a buzzword.

>he always assumes I'm disagreeing with him

The only thing I disagree with you on is ideology, I've never disagreed with anything else you've said

>missing the point completely
I was referring to the dichotomy of anyone disagreeing with you being from tumblr. That's what came across.

>So what would you rather we call them?
I'd rather ignore those runts, but if you have to call them something, just go with w*Men because they're all like that

Thanks to whoever posted the extra credits on Justinian and Belasarius.

Or if you want to refer to the fat ones with dyed hair, then go "the radical leftist w*Men"

Your welcome :D

>You're DUMB!
Well if that's your perception there's really no point in arguing about it.
>Yes, why?
Because that means you see things in black and white, because you let your extremely limited personal scope dictate your entire view of things
>When did I not like anyone doing it?
You're telling me I'm seeing things in black and white, and that you've demonstrated that to be true.
while you yourself can only think in black and white.

It's reality, precisely because it's my perception. See? Simple.

>You're telling me I'm seeing things in black and white, and that you've demonstrated that to be true
Generalisations aren't seeing things in black and white you nonce, seeing things in black and white is making false dichotomies

>while you yourself can only think in black and white.
Where's the gray area?

>I was referring to the dichotomy of anyone disagreeing with you being from tumblr. That's what came across.

Exactly, and that makes you say that I can only see things in black and white.
While you think everyone who says SJW is a cheetos-eating fatty.

Why are you calling me out for something you're obviously doing yourself?

>Why are you calling me out for something you're obviously doing yourself?
Besides the shit I've been saying, two wrongs don't make a right, do they?

Actually, if you think that everyone who does a certain thing IS a certain thing, you're seeing it in black and white.

Because there's only two alternatives, either you do the thing (use the word SJW), which makes you thing (fat) or you don't do it and you're not that thing.

That is seeing things in black and white.

>Two wrongs don't make a right
But it does make you a hypocrite when you hold other people to standards you don't apply to yourself.

Yes, and it's true, isn't it?
Everyone who uses that word has at least a few tens of extra pounds.

That has root in my beliefs, which is that my perception is reality. However, since I cannot even prove that your perception exists, I have to point out the flaws in your argument.

simple as

Well either that or they've learnt it from someone like that.

>During the Gamergate controversy, the negative connotation gained increased use, and was particularly aimed at those espousing views adhering to social liberalism, cultural inclusiveness, or feminism, as well as views deemed to be politically correct.

here's what's commonly termed as objective proof if you want it

So you're some kind of Spinozan monist?
That's pretty drab.
Although how is it possible for you to do something wrong (as in two wrongs don't make a right) when you're not applying standards to yourself?
This is just giving me a headache now.

>Although how is it possible for you to do something wrong (as in two wrongs don't make a right) when you're not applying standards to yourself?
I'm doing a wrong if I experience a loss in personal benefit when doing it.
For example, if I used the word "SJW", I'd be disgusted at myself so that'd be wrong
Also Spinoza believed in God and parallelism, so no thanks

>I'm doing a wrong if I experience a loss in personal benefit when doing it.
But that's not the wrong we're talking about here is it?
Surely some wrongs must be more wrong than others, while other wrongs, the ones you accuse me of for example (while doing them yourself) doesn't matter to you at all. Instead, they only matter when other people (who are only there because of your perception in the first place) do them?

>Instead, they only matter when other people (who are only there because of your perception in the first place) do them?
Yes.

God this is why I don't reveal my full collection of autism, it makes normies think I'm crazy

But if we were to argue about this properly, there is a correlative effect between saying the word "SJW" and being a fatty, while there is not one between opposing the term and browsing tumblr; therefore, under materialistic circumstances, you're still more wrong desu

im finally home.
now i can be a letargic useless fuckboi again

also i am a manly man.
not a bottom.
promise

>while there is not one between opposing the term and browsing tumblr;
In my experience there definitely is.
So you're.. double wrong?

HOWEVER, the aforementioned correlative effect is backed up by a related causative effect.

>During the Gamergate controversy, the negative connotation gained increased use, and was particularly aimed at those espousing views adhering to social liberalism, cultural inclusiveness, or feminism, as well as views deemed to be politically correct.

People who care about gaming journalism are almost undoubtedly fat.

These are the same people who popularised the word.

To oppose the word SJW carries solely the prerequisite of knowing that these people are unhygienic and repulsive, and therefore opposing them; either that or opposing it on a semantic basis (which I do too)

Reminds me of the time some cunt decided to label me as the kind of person who would call someone an SJW, how odd

Who?
I hope not me

Of course it isn't you, some guy I know in real life who watches Steven Universe
Oddly enough he was quite a smart person

should i download steam now

>People who care about gaming journalism are almost undoubtedly fat.
Citation needed
>To oppose the word SJW carries solely the prerequisite of knowing that these people are unhygienic and repulsive
Which isn't true of course. Which is why your argument falls flat.

And I'm fairly sure there were plenty of people using SJW as a negative connotation before the gamergate shit went down, which is why it says INCREASE and not that the term was coined during gamergate.

After all this, I'd still fuck your pussy(male) if I could.
But you'd deny me because of my polticial beliefs - which means you're the real close minded bigot here!

>Citation needed
fatty detected
>Which isn't true of course. Which is why your argument falls flat.
How isn't it true?
>But you'd deny me because of my polticial beliefs - which means you're the real close minded bigot here!
What's wrong with that? I'm opposed to "people" like Americans and women

Not all of course, there are decent Americans and women out there, but that's not common

About as common as fascists who aren't fat desu

Oh and if you're fat I wouldn't go near you

I'm not free yet
C-could you wait m-more ready?

am installing it first

>ausnz
>not a single fucking AUS flag
Facking nerds.

I will work for an hour (or less) then I will send the request

>What's wrong with that? I'm opposed to "people" like Americans and women
It's wrong because it's happening to me and I'm not American or a woman
>fatty detected
I don't care about game journalism, but I will automatically side with anyone who doesn't agree with whatever feminism has become in 2018.
>How isn't it true?
How is it true.
You're making a claim that all gamergate(supporters?) are fat.
Also, the term SJW was used before gamergate in a negative connotation according to the quotes you've shown me yourself.

But you're a fat fascist
>but I will automatically side with anyone who doesn't agree with whatever feminism has become in 2018
I agree, but I don't want your flabs on my side
>You're making a claim that all gamergate(supporters?) are fat.
But they are? They're literally people who read gaming articles
>the term SJW was used before gamergate in a negative connotation according to the quotes you've shown me yourself.
By fatties from Sup Forums

Used to know a fatty who browsed Sup Forums in real life, the absolute clown haha

Rude.
Who exactly will exterminate Commies, if not Fascists?

people who don't like both
commies and fascists would be asked to suck each others' cocks on live tv if i were emperor

>Fat fascist
But let's say, for the sake of argument, that I wasn't a fat fascist, but just a fascist.
What then?
>I agree, but I don't want your flabs on my side
Not really sure what you mean by this desu
>But they are? They're literally people who read gaming articles
And there are people who collect stamps.
People are into all sorts of things I don't understand.
>By fatties from Sup Forums
Right now you seem like the kind of person who believes that everyone who doesn't agree with you is a fatty.

And who exactly would this magical faction be?

In my opinion, any other ideology will allow the slow disintegration of society.
Even conservatives don't really care about borders, law and order.

>using force to coerce political oppenents into submission
Ahh, sounds just like us, only we accept who we are.

'WHEREFORE thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest. For wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself. For thou dost the same things which thou judgest.'
- Romans 2:1