It's a liberals suddenly care about freedom of speech when it affects them episode

>it's a liberals suddenly care about freedom of speech when it affects them episode

Other urls found in this thread:

aclu.org/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

gawker dindu nuffin

Tbh I don't give a shit about freedom of speech unless it affect me either. I'd literally support a totalitarian dictatorship as long as it's in my interests.

>rich people corrupting the justice system
>wtf why do people care?!

I honestly think the vast majority of people are secretly like this.

I support men in black leather trenchcoats and face concealing helmets marching down the street shooting public smokers

prove he paid off the judge, oh wait you can't. LEG DROP'D.

yeah i agree

Ok Rob Reiner but people stuffing there faces on the street is ok

Would George have been different with this luscious locks of hair on Seinfeld?

...

Yes however most people are also smart enough to know that such a thing is nearly impossible.
>Sure I'd be cool with a brutal dictatorship so long as it didn't impede things I like, invade my privacy, and potentially risk my life
It's like saying
>I'd eat shit if it looked smelled and tasted good and didn't carry the stigma of eating shit

Hulk Hogan BELONGS in San Francisco.

This movie sucked
It goes along with this theme that the free press is under siege when more information is freely available than ever
Gawker was just pure karma

Sure, my point however is that OP is probably virtue signaling.

>it's a Trump supporters only pretend to care about free speech until their guy wins and they can shut off the cameras at press briefings and intimidate the media for telling the truth

fuck off, reddit

Fuck off out of my country then, Nazi faggot

oh look another reddit faggot

me too, im sort of just waiting for a good dictator to get behind so I can take to the street and start killing lefties in the ensuing struggle for power

cuck spotted

>virtue signaling
>anonymous

>he thinks not holding daily press briefings and calling fake news fake news is a violation of the first amendment

>court order to take down sex tape
>refuse
>get sued
>use scummy journalists to deliver narrative how youre the victim

People actually do that. I mean fuck we're on Sup Forums half of the people on here are always being pretentious.

>someone said something I dont like!
>call him reddit/cuck! That's an insult, right?

Everytime.

reddit cuck reddit cuck reddit cuck

>people that read Hillary's private mail suddenly caring about the privacy of famous people
reminder that if Hogan was a leftist all the people defending this would be on the other side

This is how they go about things- rewriting the narrative.

Gawker wasn't a scummy internet tabloid that openly said they'd post pedo material if it got them clicks, and decided to dig into a man's personal life for the hell of it, they're a righteous organization trying to deliver truth to the populace.

>however most people are also smart enough to know that such a thing is nearly impossible.

i don't think so, sadly

no half the people on here are thirsty for (You)'s and they do every sort of trick in the book to get them

Hogan isn't a political figure whose dealings have ramifications to the world at large.

Gawker was nothing but a narrative pushing propaganda outlet. They themselves advocated and pushed for censorship that went against their agenda, so I don't see nothing bad in it for them going down on that same sword.

seek help

>exposing a corrupt politician's corruption of a democratic process
>Exploiting a man's sex tape which was made without his knowledge in the name of click bait

yeah schlomo, totally the same thing

>generic stacy actress gets pics leaked of her being a slut
>moral crusade in her defense
>washed up fat balding old man gets pics leaked of him being a slut
>???

>>people that read Hillary's private mail

Typical ignorant lefty.

John Podesta's emails were released.

and they were emails not video of hillary getting dildoed by huma

Beautiful and wonderful leftists hypocrisy!
Guys, how do liberals function? How do they deal with all that cognitive dissonance?

I would like you to try and imagine a totalitarian dictatorship in your interest when you're not in charge.

I don't think it can be done, but maybe you could prove me wrong.

How is releasing footage of a guy having sex without his knowledge "free speech" and not invasion of privacy?

Well he actually made the people who leaked it go out of business, so there's definitely more bite than bark there.

same way everyone else does. go to echo chambers and giggle

>leak someone's stolen sextape
>WOW I OWN THE RIGHT TO EXPOSE THIS PERSON'S GENETALIA HOW DARE YOU SILENCE ME THIS IS LEGITIMATE NEWS I'M A LEGITIMATE JOURNALIST FUCK YOU NAZI

>l-lefty!
shut up retard

Most people are stupid self-serving parasites like yourself, yes.

...

Ohhhh did I hurt your fee fees?

...

Isn't this the site/board that unanimously defends revenge porn/celebrity photo leaks? It's like satire how dumb this site has gotten

Believe what you want.

>release sex tape of hulk hogan
>his lawyers send a letter saying "hey please take that down"
>post the letter the lawyers wrote, while triumphantly and smugly stating they weren't going to take it down
>get sued into oblivion
>WTF HOW DID THIS HAPPEN

All of this coming from the same website that posted articles accusing anyone who looked at Jennifer Lawrence's nudes to be literal rapist manpigs. They deserved everything they got for being such retarded hypocrites.

>Unanimously

Yes retard, everyone on the board is the same person.

I really would like to emphasize this, though.

Years down the line, what is going to be simpler for people who want to find out about info regarding Gawker? The multiple articles that, even from back then, tip-toed around how nasty they were, because they were written by the media themselves, and didn't want to attack their own? or more simply, a "critically acclaimed" documentary?

If they can't control the narrative and got off free, they'll overwhelm history with the notion that they were unjustly wronged.

People are remarkably good at changing their opinions to match the leaders they think they agree with. As long as it's "their guys" in power, they will accept totalitarianism completely.

This

You know I see this as the typical response when someone says "this board defends or says [offensive/horrible/retarded thing]"- yet no one ever steps forward and says "no, I don't agree with it". It's always someone just coming in and saying "This board isn't all one person!! IDiot!" and then dropping the subject.

Not really meant to accuse anyone of anything, merely an observation

STACY BTFO
keep them weekly checks coming to Hulkamania
WHATCHAGONNADO

You're not the same person, but you are almost all near clinically retarded alt rightists and boot-lickers. I say unanimous because I've been in numerous threads about leaks and there's never a single person claiming it's morally wrong. Unless it happens to some brain damaged fake wrestler apparently. It really is remarkable how this place has been distilled to a near 100% concentration of human garbage.

I've never felt so alone when I finally realised this to be true.

>telling the truth
>in a country where journalists were already ranked 3rd least trustworthy profession

wanting to oppress those going against your interests is basic human nature.

>alt rightists
>he thinks the "alt right" is a real thing outside of r/The_Faggot

I don't think leaking personal info, in general, is right. Unless we're talking important shit, that involves politics and whatnot, a person's private life is a person's private life. It's none of my business.

That said, it happens. If you're a celebrity, you run the risk. If you're the one who leaks that stuff though, you better have a good cover, cause then you'll get Hogan'd.

No one ever said Gawker couldn't talk about the details of Hulk Hogan or the sex tape. They just said they couldn't host someone's personal private sex tape that was procured illegally in the first place. They decided to defy the judge and keep it up hoping that the viral attention would make more money than whatever fine the government gave them.

It turns out committing illegal practices and defying federal judges can destroy your company. Who knew?

that's just like your opinion, man

>It really is remarkable how this place has been distilled to a near 100% concentration of human garbage.
And look at you fitting right in with the rest of us.

Probably because people who disagree aren't in that thread.

Not to mention it's a waste of time to virtue signal "look at me! I disagree!".

Your current view is thus
>Why won't people do what I want?

Because you're a faggot. That's why.

>I've been in numerous threads about leaks

Cums for the Fappening, stays for the Social Justice

Um, racism much?

Wanting to believe you are right and always have been right is also human nature. People are so obsessed with this that they willingly vote against their own interests in order to maintain their bubble.

>All these buttblasted Trumptards

I love how because a billionaire paid for the lawyers, liberals somehow think that bypassed the judicial system.

gawker is click bait trash I'm glad there dead and this thread should be deleted.

>logical consistency and morality are now social justice

You Sup Forums filth deserve to get horrific diseases, I think even pacifists would agree at this point. It really is like satire how bad you all are as people in every single way it's possible to be a bad person. You're like badly written cartoon villains. Thankfully not even prostitutes want to go near you.

>I've been in numerous threads about leaks and there's never a single person claiming it's morally wrong.

Okay let's discuss it right now:

WAS IT MORALLY WRONG FOR WIKILEAKS TO RELEASE JOHN PODESTAS EMAILS EXPOSING DNC COLLUSION TO FUCK OVER BERNIE SANDERS AND HAND HILLARY THE NOMINATION?

You faggots only ever bitch about the happening, not the ((contents)).

>it's another "trying to save face by trying to claim everyone who responded to you is assblasted" episode

kys

if you post one more philosophical musing i'm going to slap you

Oh boy a thread about liberals

Reminder.

cringe

>You're like badly written cartoon villains

Well considering you're making badly constructed strawmen off of random people, isn't that kind of your fault? Maybe you should take a class? Figure out how to flesh out characters a tad better?

I never complain about low birthrates. I complain about importing niggers who breed like rabbits and over population in general. Low birthrates are a good thing for us and for niggers. You however sound like you enjoy smelling your own farts a bit too much and should just go all the way and gas yourself for good.

>he thinks the first dictator in America will be conservative
enjoy your mandatory public cocksucking

>confusing an Oldfag for /pol fag

Smells like summer in here

>it's a Sup Forums pretends to care about freedom of speech episode

You can go on Sup Forums right now and say whatever you want. It's pretty free.

This. Only Sup Forums truly cares about free speech.

WE are Sup Forums as it should be.

That's literally the only thing people on Sup Forums can agree on

only because the mods aren't Sup Forumsacks

I guess they think that Oliver Brown, a welder for a railroad company managed to pay for all the legal fees for Brown vs Board of Education

>awful clickbait shit has no journalistic integrity
No surprise there
The show in the OP is shit and I'm glad Gawker is dead
>infringing on someone's privacy
>freedom of speech

Sup Forums exists because of free speech.
Granted that's the reason their esoteric Hitlerism is larping but you're still a faggot.

Only those obsessed with the craft of the Hebrew Race can combat the Hebrew Race.

>liberals suddenly care about freedom of speech

aclu.org/

that organization could give a shit about speech

>the fight is on
>donate now
What the fuck do they even hope to accomplish with this? Do they honestly believe Trump will get impeached if people donate enough? Plus the fact that even if they did get dirt on Trump, it's going to do fucking nothing

Why are Sup Forumstards so obsessed with liberals ?

They want Mike "electrocute the shit out of gays" Pence as president.