How did they get away with it?

How did they get away with it?

>2007
>go to watch Simpsons movie with family
>cops come in during this scene and arrest everyone for viewing CP

>showing Barts weiner is funny!
>showing Lisas cunny is disgusting and sexual!

What if the next movie shows Lisa spreading her cunny wide open with her fingers? Would that make you feel more even?

willies are funny

It wasn't sexualized and too detailed.

So many shows did the goofy censoring that when the Simpsons did that scene, it was actually funny

Yes.

dicks are just funnier looking than vaginas

A combination of the long setup and the iconic nature of the simpsons allowed them to get away with it.

This is normal.
Showing guys naked is suppose to be funny. Showing girls naked are sexually exploiting them.

or the Pedofinder General

Yeah there is a bit of a double standard.
Its especialy jaring with newborn children in film a male is always shot from the front a female from behind and its incredibly noticeable.

These. It's not hard to figure out unless you're busy with an axe to grind.

Vaginas look funny, you can turn them into like mouths and shit for comedic effect. Just imagine Little Shop of Horrors but vaginal, all funny voices and musical montages. Cinema is pretty shit because the most they want to do with vaginas is not even show them, just muff, and there's a lot of comedic value lost due to that restriction.

this desu, im not even a pedo i just want some equality

B-but I've done nothing wrong!

If you're the typical prude 'Merican sure. If they showed Lisa naked in Europe no one would give a shit.

Yeah i get it, remember when post movie spongebob did the convenient censorship gag on sandy...............when she was wearing a bikini?.................it didnt make any sense

Male nudity even depicted as an animated child is ok. But you can't have naked underage little girls because evil pedo white men will go on a rape spree. This is a real opinion. Simpsons had a baby burning man joke episode skit that didn't go over well and they haven't messed with girl nudity sense. They have showed barts ass nearly 50 times though. Double standards. Not defending anything but for the sake of comedic/artistic freedom.

Because it's a curvy fucking line.

You don't need a kid shoving their fist into their junk to know they are nude user. This is what you white knights don't understand. Having lisa run through a park because of a Roman play wardrobe malfunction for reasons and a 1 second POORLY drawn scene of her running front side into a bush would suffice. Dont have to draw lips, nips, crack or clit, just a barely noticeable v line and we have reached a middle ground of gender equality. The very thing women should want, the De sexualization of the female body. Perverts like you who only see kiddie fucking when a dad let's his daughter use his backyard pool naked are the fucking problem. Go guard a public park from single dad's you scum.

Patriarchy pls go

The vast majority of humans on Earth do not see children as sexual at all so sometimes they can get away with little kids running around sans pants, paranoid church groups imagining pedophiles are a bigger problem than actual pedos who are a teeny sliver of humans.

I actually believe that most people in earth are prone to pedophile tendencies, fuck the laws we have are brand new in the scale of time and most people just don't flip when they turn 18. To say the least, humanity had always used girls of birthing age (12-13) before our average life expectancy had risen within recent years. It was only a couple generations ago that kids were expected to birth young, which modern media has portrayed in accurately

Well yeah current ages of consent are absurd but your not describing pedophilia.

>humanity had always used girls of birthing age (12-13) before our average life expectancy had risen within recent years. It was only a couple generations ago that kids were expected to birth young, which modern media has portrayed in accurately

This is inaccurate and a common misconception actually, partially because marriage was too expensive for most people until they were closer to adulthood and partly because first menstration was a little later in the past, more like 14-16 depending on time period, a lot of really young marriages were on paper things for aristrocrats to protect their land and shit and didn't involve actual sex until later. Well and Muhammed, he was a pedo.

But anyway generally people generally define pedo as attraction to BEFORE puberty people so teenagers aren't pedo per se.

>living in Canada

That happens in 2016.

Boys being naked is funny and cute. Girls being naked is inherently sexual and impure.

>They have showed barts ass nearly 50 times though
Gonna need some citation or proof of this.