He had the bloody nerve to make a show called "The Politically Incorrect Parenting Show" and it was fucking left wing
Pop Science
I look like a friendly science man, but I'm not.
I'm an entitled eco-activist who demands Canadian taxpayers pay for my "bodyguards" (escorts).
If you don't think I'm a good man, go to jail. My friends Wynne and Trudeau will call you a racist homophobe.
His books are fun to read...
I'm pretty sure that guy is a closet homosexual.
His science is good for tv though.
Not great, but watchable.
you are looking at it too narrowly
>1. if you already understand what he talks/writes about then why the fuck would you be watching it. Do I still read picture books? Fuck no.
>2.if you don't understand him, then pay attention you unknowledgeable cunt, you may learn some bullshit that you will never be able to apply to your real life.
>3.kids, look how cool all this science stuff is! Be inspired and shit!
In short, Pop Science has a positive net effect on your stupid ass.
How does Sup Forums feel about Dr. Franklin Ruehl?
I fucking hate that guy. Was about to close Sup Forums and go to bed but sticking around long enough to post this. Fuck Nigel Latta.
But pop-sci has pretty much crowded out all the good documentaries that used to be made before they decided to market to people with the intelligence of a 6 year old.
>you may learn some bullshit that you will never be able to apply to your real life.
Ha. Wrong! Never been to a pub quiz before?
That Q&A was hard to stomach yes, but Malcolm Roberts really did not understand why he was wrong right about Climate Change. This is the first I've ever seen or heard of him but he seemed entirely reasonable.
And citing the UN's IPCC as evidence against climate science was just ripe.