You may post ITT only if most of your country is uninhabited

You may post ITT only if most of your country is uninhabited.

Other urls found in this thread:

diegovalle.net/maps/nobody-lives-here
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Reporting in

...

After this map was posted in 2014 by Nik freeman, it has inspired others to make similar ones, the Canadian one was the second one to be posted and then one from Mexico, and here's the interactive Mexican version by Diego Valle-Jones from December 2014
diegovalle.net/maps/nobody-lives-here

and here's the revised version for Canada

...

...

None of these are true for the Canadian prairies. Like, just look at a fucking map. You can find some hicktown, if not a small city, in every one of the green spots.

it's funny when some Canadians brag about how huge their country is yet nobody lives north of the US border

Here's a reference for that. This is a map of all of Saskatchewan's rural municipalities (the islands of white are cities and major towns). The least populated of these RMs, Glen McPherson, still has over 70 inhabitants.

Edmonton has a larger population than Helsinki and is 500km from the U.S. border, or the distance from Aland to St. Petersburg. Even if you're including Alaska, Nunavut has numerous settlements further north than Barrow: Resolute, Grise Fiord, Dundaus Harbour. Alert and Eureka, which are both permanently inhabited, are the further north permanent settlements in the world.

Hey

Hello

It's almost as if you have no idea what you're talking about because you know nothing of Canadian geography.

>Water (nobody lives here either)

Reporting in

Fixed. All of it is green because Canadians aren't people

There are municipalities without anyone living there? What's the point? Why not include those areas into nearby inhabited municipalities

...

...

Ignore the bork bork language, you get the idea of what it is.